Re: [cmake-developers] Support of codesign

2014-09-26 Thread A. Klitzing
Well, first patch had a little mistake. I attached an update... From 4e19b766ff26a73f4667d8f88ab6ad64c40c37d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Andr=C3=A9=20Klitzing?= aklitz...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:28:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Add support for codesign on MacOS ---

Re: [cmake-developers] Support of codesign

2014-09-26 Thread Brad King
On 09/25/2014 04:40 PM, A. Klitzing wrote: I refactored the patches of Brian Milco to support code signing of bundles in MacOS. [snip] On 09/26/2014 03:29 AM, A. Klitzing wrote: Well, first patch had a little mistake. I attached an update... Thanks! I've applied the patch and merged to our

Re: [cmake-developers] Support of codesign

2014-09-26 Thread clinton
I would suggest the SignPackage function be moved from cmCPackDragNDropGenerator to cmCPackBundleGenerator because its implementation is only usable by cmCPackBundleGenerator. It uses CPACK_BUNDLE_NAME which is only valid in the context of cmCPackBundleGenerator. Clint - Original

Re: [cmake-developers] Support of codesign

2014-09-26 Thread Brad King
On 09/26/2014 09:52 AM, Brad King wrote: I've applied the patch and merged to our 'next' branch for testing: CPack: Add support for code signing of bundles on MacOS http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=1a9b0668 I reverted the topic because several CPackComponents tests fail

Re: [cmake-developers] Was AUTOMOC designed to run for each build?

2014-09-26 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Friday, September 26, 2014 01:53:35 Stephen Kelly wrote: Alexander Neundorf wrote: I don't see why the target is executed each time, but is it that way by design? iirc, yes. The moc files have to be generated before any of the source files is compiled, so automoc is in a target

Re: [cmake-developers] Extracting target metadata, IDE integration

2014-09-26 Thread Aleix Pol
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: Aleix Pol wrote: Hi, Here's another iteration of the patch [1]. Thanks for this. Can you tell me why exportName is part of the output?