> The documentation for ctest_configure(), ctest_build(), and ctest_submit()
> isn't completely clear on what happens if one of these steps fails. Let's
> say I have the following dashboard script (this is pseudocode, arguments
> have been deliberately omitted for brevity, this example won't
>Is there a header file too?
Yes, it is - /opt/intel/vtune_amplifier_2018.2.0.551022/include/ittnotify.h
>It's possible to provide a package configuration file for projects
>that don't build with CMake. Qt5 does it. IIRC the Intel TBB
>developers were looking at doing it too.
Thanks for the
On 05/30/2018 10:18 AM, Gurulev, Dmitry wrote:
> ITT comes w/ VTune app. in binary form
> (/opt/intel/vtune_amplifier_2018.2.0.551022/lib64/libittnotify.a)
Is there a header file too?
> VTune is not CMake based distributive, no way to add cmake
> package config to it.
It's possible to provide a
Example - ITT comes w/ VTune app. in binary form
(/opt/intel/vtune_amplifier_2018.2.0.551022/lib64/libittnotify.a). But VTune is
not CMake based distributive, no way to add cmake package config to it.
From: Brad King [brad.k...@kitware.com]
Sent:
On 05/30/2018 10:05 AM, Gurulev, Dmitry wrote:
> It might be a binary package, no way to provide package config.
I don't understand. Does it provide header files? Does it provide
a "linktome.lib" file?
-Brad
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ
>That project's upstream should be able to provide a package configuration file
>as well.
It might be a binary package, no way to provide package config.
From: Brad King [brad.k...@kitware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 4:10 PM
To: Gurulev, Dmitry;
On 05/30/2018 09:54 AM, Eric Noulard wrote:
> protoc can already do something like that but it spits out a makefile
> includable file.
>
> see --dependency_out=FILE option.
That may work well for the Ninja generator at least. See the
add_custom_command `DEPFILE` option.
One day it would be
Le mer. 30 mai 2018 à 15:12, Brad King a écrit :
> On 05/29/2018 04:00 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> >> In order to handle implicit dependencies like that implied by
> >>
> >> import "MyBase.proto";
> >>
> >> then they would somehow need to be extracted from source content.
> >
> > Would
On 05/29/2018 04:00 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>> In order to handle implicit dependencies like that implied by
>>
>> import "MyBase.proto";
>>
>> then they would somehow need to be extracted from source content.
>
> Would that have to be implemented similar to the C dependency scanning ?
On 05/30/2018 01:56 AM, Gurulev, Dmitry wrote:
> what about stand-alone ITT?
That project's upstream should be able to provide a package configuration
file as well.
-Brad
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
Yes, of course, I can. And I'm going to do that, I've already written. My
question is - what about stand-alone ITT?
-Original Message-
From: Sergei Nikulov [mailto:sergey.niku...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 8:52 AM
To: Gurulev, Dmitry
Cc: brad.k...@kitware.com;
11 matches
Mail list logo
