Stephen Kelly steveire@... writes:
Do you have any thoughts on the CPACK_PACKAGE_CONTACT problem? Namely that
the debian generator and the BAR generator have differing expectations on
what such a thing would contain. Should we have separate
CPACK_PACKAGE_CONTACT_NAME and
Stephen Kelly steveire@... writes:
Do you have any thoughts on the CPACK_PACKAGE_CONTACT problem?
Namely that
the debian generator and the BAR generator have differing
expectations on
what such a thing would contain. Should we have separate
CPACK_PACKAGE_CONTACT_NAME and
2013/10/29 David Cole dlrd...@aol.com:
Stephen Kelly steveire@... writes:
Do you have any thoughts on the CPACK_PACKAGE_CONTACT problem?
Namely that
the debian generator and the BAR generator have differing
expectations on
what such a thing would contain. Should we have separate
References:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2631065/what-is-the-format-of-email-header-name-email
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-3.4
David Cole dlrd...@aol.com works fine as-is for .deb.
Thanks -- good to know.
The regex shown on the Stackoverflow article is scary.
2013/9/20 Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com:
Stephen Kelly steveire@... writes:
https://gitorious.org/~steveire/cmake/steveires-cmake
It is the start of a CPack generator for BlackBerry BAR packages, required
for deployment to those devices. I haven't worked much with CPack before, so
I'd
Hi there,
I've pushed a cpack-bar-package topic to my clone
https://gitorious.org/~steveire/cmake/steveires-cmake
It is the start of a CPack generator for BlackBerry BAR packages, required
for deployment to those devices. I haven't worked much with CPack before, so
I'd appreciate some
