Hi Zack,
On 04/09/17 15:13, Zack Galbreath wrote:
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Wouter Klouwen
> wrote:
I think if I want it to work in the most optimal way where ctest can
schedule all tests in the mega project for all
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Wouter Klouwen
wrote:
> I think if I want it to work in the most optimal way where ctest can
> schedule all tests in the mega project for all sub projects in
> accordance with its load balancing, the SubProject attribute would have
> to
Hi David,
thanks for your view.
I think if I want it to work in the most optimal way where ctest can
schedule all tests in the mega project for all sub projects in
accordance with its load balancing, the SubProject attribute would have
to become a property of the test, instead of being a global
I think your analysis is correct.
You could try doing a ctest_submit after each ctest_test call. Not
sure if you could get "correct" results with that technique. I run
some scripts that do something similar without subproject involved,
and it mostly works, but messes up the +/- tests passed and
Hi all,
I've been having some success with CTest and am interested in using
CDash as well.
In order to generate some nice output, sub projects seem to be the best
way of presenting the data in CDash for our setup. This setup is perhaps
summed up by having one projects that contains a few