Re: [cmake-developers] kwsysProcess threadsafety

2018-01-08 Thread Jean-Michaël Celerier
> 3) Abandon the idea to parallelize AUTOMOC/UIC please no ! moc is a huge bottleneck in my builds (to the point that using verdigris instead ends up having faster build time overall). Best, Jean-Michaël --- Jean-Michaël Celerier

Re: [cmake-developers] kwsysProcess threadsafety

2018-01-08 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On 2018 M01 8, Mon 10:32:22 CET Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote: > > 3) Abandon the idea to parallelize AUTOMOC/UIC > > please no ! moc is a huge bottleneck in my builds (to the point that using > verdigris instead ends up having > faster build time overall). you

Re: [cmake-developers] kwsysProcess threadsafety

2018-01-08 Thread Brad King
On 01/06/2018 02:31 AM, Sebastian Holtermann wrote: >>> 2) Use libuv instead > > I just saw the libuv library in the CMake sources. > >> libuv for process management is on the list. I think it is waiting for >> porting to all of CMake's platforms to actually happen. > > Does that mean it's

Re: [cmake-developers] kwsysProcess threadsafety

2018-01-08 Thread Sebastian Holtermann
On Montag, 8. Januar 2018 06:56:57 CET Brad King wrote: > On 01/06/2018 02:31 AM, Sebastian Holtermann wrote: > >>> 2) Use libuv instead > > > > I just saw the libuv library in the CMake sources. > > > >> libuv for process management is on the list. I think it is waiting for > >> porting to all

Re: [cmake-developers] kwsysProcess threadsafety

2018-01-08 Thread Brad King
On 01/08/2018 07:26 AM, Sebastian Holtermann wrote: > Then I'm going to refactor cmQtAutoGeneratorMocUic > to use a libuv event loop internally. Great. Take a look at Source/cmUVHandlePtr.h for some C++ helpers. -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the