Re: [cmake-developers] WG: [CMake] CMake 2.8.12.201401116 is much slower than 2.8.12.1

On 1/29/2014 8:35 AM, Dominik Bernhardt wrote: I just tested it again with the latest master from today. For my particular project the configure step with the current master takes 290s. If I only replace the UseQt4.cmake in the master with the version from 2.8.12.1 the configure time goes down

Re: [cmake-developers] CMake 2.8.12.201401116 is much slower than 2.8.12.1

On 01/29/2014 08:35 AM, Dominik Bernhardt wrote: I just tested it again with the latest master from today. For my particular project the configure step with the current master takes 290s. If I only replace the UseQt4.cmake in the master with the version from 2.8.12.1 the configure time

Re: [cmake-developers] RFC: add version to project() call

On 2014-01-29 09:58, Brad King wrote: I reverted the 'AddVersionToProjectCommand' topic from 'next' and replaced it with a 'project-version-variables' topic that adds a policy: Help: Format project command and variable documentation

Re: [cmake-developers] RFC: add version to project() call

On 01/29/2014 10:33 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: Can one use project(VERSION) and later set the policy to OLD to get the old, don't-unset-the-variables behavior from that point onwards? Yes. A subproject that has not been updated to understand the policy would normally run

Re: [cmake-developers] WG: [CMake] CMake 2.8.12.201401116 is much slower than 2.8.12.1

On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 02:35:53 PM Dominik Bernhardt wrote: -Urspruengliche Nachricht- Von: Clinton Stimpson [mailto:clin...@elemtech.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Januar 2014 16:10 An: cmake-developers@cmake.org Cc: Bill Hoffman; Dominik Bernhardt Betreff: Re:

Re: [cmake-developers] WG: [CMake] CMake 2.8.12.201401116 is much slower than 2.8.12.1

-Urspruengliche Nachricht- Von: Clinton Stimpson [mailto:clin...@elemtech.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. Januar 2014 17:07 An: cmake-developers@cmake.org Cc: Dominik Bernhardt Betreff: Re: [cmake-developers] WG: [CMake] CMake 2.8.12.201401116 is much slower than 2.8.12.1 [...] Can

Re: [cmake-developers] WG: [CMake] CMake 2.8.12.201401116 is much slower than 2.8.12.1

On 1/29/2014 11:54 AM, Dominik Bernhardt wrote: Unfortunately it did not help. Approximately same results as before. Have you run --trace to see why UseQt4 is being parsed so many times? -Bill -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at

[cmake-developers] kwrobot changing documentation

I noticed in the git history that the kitware robot changed the documentation in the source files to something with :: characters between paragraphs. It also seemed to add them between the paragraphs of the same descriptions: # CUDA_WRAP_SRCS ( cuda_target format generated_files file0 file1

Re: [cmake-developers] add_custom_command changes, was [Introductions and questions]

On Jan 24, 2014, at 3:25 PM, Steve Wilson ste...@wolfram.com wrote: The first item I would like to see merged back to the project is issue 9974 in the Mantis tracker (CMake should support custom commands that can vary by configuration). I am the author of the original set of patches

[cmake-developers] Policy CMP0043

In working with my older build system with CMake from the master branch, I quickly ran into policy CMP0043: Ignore COMPILE_DEFINITIONS_Config properties. My build system makes heavy use of the COMPILE_DEFINITIONS_Config, COMPILE_FLAGS_Config, LINK_FLAGS_Config paradigm for setting

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0014724]: InstallRequiredSystemLibraries does not work with component-based installers

The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14724 == Reported By:Craig Scott Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake] Reverse logic

Re-including the list. You could also find more details reading the documentation of the if command. See http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/git-master/command/if.html On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Rob McDonald rob.a.mcdon...@gmail.comwrote: Yep, that does it for me. Sneaky... Rob On