[cmake-developers] Adding source files not built by targets to CMake project

2015-11-20 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
Hi, As far as I know this is not possible, but I would love for someone to point out the CMake invocation I missed. More and more we use a mixture of languages in projects, such as in VTK where we have Python wrapping, and tomviz where we have a number of algorithms implemented in Python (and I

Re: [cmake-developers] Adding source files not built by targets to CMake project

2015-11-20 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Nils Gladitz <nilsglad...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/20/2015 04:43 PM, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: >> >> I would like to see these files listed in Qt Creator (or insert your >> IDE of choice here). Is there anyway to do this, knowing that t

Re: [cmake-developers] DeployQt5/generalizing DeployQt4 for Qt5

2014-02-17 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: Hi, Is anyone working on, or have, a DeployQt5 or a generalized DeployQt4? We use it in our

[cmake-developers] DeployQt5/generalizing DeployQt4 for Qt5

2014-02-16 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
Hi, Is anyone working on, or have, a DeployQt5 or a generalized DeployQt4? We use it in our packaging process, and it is one of the last things I need to switch to Qt 5. If not, I was going to take a look at this, and see what I can put together. Thanks, Marcus -- Powered by www.kitware.com

Re: [cmake-developers] DeployQt5/generalizing DeployQt4 for Qt5

2014-02-16 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: Hi, Is anyone working on, or have, a DeployQt5 or a generalized DeployQt4? We use it in our packaging process, and it is one of the last things I need to switch to Qt 5. If not, I was going

Re: [cmake-developers] CMake master, Qt dialog and Qt4/5 installed has problems

2013-04-08 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote: On 04/07/2013 06:29 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: Brad King wrote: http://open.cdash.org/viewBuildError.php?buildid=2865930 because there is no //bin/moc. Interesting. Can you say more about what happens? The point of the

Re: [cmake-developers] CMake master, Qt dialog and Qt4/5 installed has problems

2013-04-04 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: Stephen Kelly wrote: Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: Hi, I was updating my machine earlier today, and wanted to build the latest CMake master (00ef90). I am using Arch Linux with Qt 4 and Qt 5 installed. If I compile

[cmake-developers] CMake master, Qt dialog and Qt4/5 installed has problems

2013-04-03 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
Hi, I was updating my machine earlier today, and wanted to build the latest CMake master (00ef90). I am using Arch Linux with Qt 4 and Qt 5 installed. If I compile with qmake-qt4 then I see the following compile failure, [ 88%] Generating qrc_CMakeSetup.cpp /bin/sh: //bin/rcc: No such file or

Re: [cmake-developers] Qt 4 and 5 on the same system - qmake binary name priority

2013-03-11 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote: On 03/11/2013 12:34 PM, Clinton Stimpson wrote: I fixed a few bugs with that patch, and it is now merged with next. Great, thanks for taking care of this. I verified that next finds the correct qmake for me too, thanks

[cmake-developers] Qt 4 and 5 on the same system - qmake binary name priority

2013-03-08 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
Hi, I notice that Arch has already patched this, but CMake master as of aa027af9 still finds /usr/bin/qmake when a /usr/bin/qmake-qt4 is available. This bug is reported here, http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13985 Is there any issue with changing the order so that if qmake-qt4 is found

Re: [cmake-developers] Qt 4 and 5 on the same system - qmake binary name priority

2013-03-08 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Clinton Stimpson clin...@elemtech.com wrote: On Friday, March 08, 2013 02:35:53 PM Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: I notice that Arch has already patched this, but CMake master as of aa027af9 still finds /usr/bin/qmake when a /usr/bin/qmake-qt4 is available. This bug

[cmake-developers] Generate export header - remove some warnings for old compilers

2013-02-20 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
Hi, I just pushed generate-export-header-warnings to the stage, this removes the warnings emitted when the compiler is old. When making extensive use of generate export headers these warnings only serve to obscure real warnings, when in my opinion generate export header is doing precisely what it

Re: [cmake-developers] Deprecating qt4_use_modules and qt4_automoc?

2013-02-14 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:21 AM, David Cole dlrd...@aol.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com To: cmake-developers cmake-developers@cmake.org Sent: Wed, Feb 6, 2013 8:17 am Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] Deprecating qt4_use_modules and qt4_automoc?

Re: [cmake-developers] Deprecating qt4_use_modules and qt4_automoc?

2013-02-06 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, The qt4_use_modules is now mostly obsoleted by tll in CMake 2.8.11. The main difference is that qt4_use_modules does not require the use of imported targets. I think we should deprecate it in favor of using

[cmake-developers] Ninja and optional support for Fortran

2012-10-14 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
Hi, We use Eigen in a few projects, and it has optional support for Fortran. It seems that the way it probes for a working Fortran compiler causes the Ninja generator to error out. CMake Error: The Ninja generator does not support the language Fortran yet. -- The Fortran compiler identification

Re: [cmake-developers] target_include_directories branch in stage

2012-02-23 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:36 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:04 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:05 AM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [cmake-developers] slow regex implementation in RegularExpression

2011-11-23 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote: On 11/23/2011 12:51 PM, Brad King wrote: On 11/23/2011 12:48 PM, Brad King wrote: On 11/23/2011 12:43 PM, Brad King wrote: On 11/23/2011 12:34 PM, Alexandru Ciobanu wrote: The regex in question is:    

Re: [cmake-developers] Automoc in cmake

2011-09-18 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote: On Saturday, September 17, 2011 07:16:28 PM Stephen Kelly wrote: Stephen Kelly steveire@... writes: Alexander Neundorf wrote: Would it be possible to make CMAKE_AUTOMOC imply CMAKE_INCLUDE_CURRENT_DIR? All

Re: [cmake-developers] Adding argument OPTIONAL to find_package() and add_subdirectory

2011-06-09 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote: On 6/9/2011 8:50 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: What if the FindFoo.cmake script calls find_package(Bar) and does not require it but the project also does find_package(Bar) and does? I'm sure there are more cases I haven't

Re: [cmake-developers] Cannot push to stage?

2011-01-30 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, I cannot push to stage? or print staged branch: $ ssh g...@cmake.org stage cmake print is lasting forever. any know trouble or is it on my side? It is certainly a little slow to respond, but it gets

Re: [cmake-developers] On Mac OS X, the CMake .app filename should not contain the version number ( http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11693#c24958 )

2011-01-20 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Clinton Stimpson clin...@elemtech.com wrote: On Thursday, January 20, 2011 09:36:13 am Eric Noulard wrote: 2011/1/20 David Cole david.c...@kitware.com: Moving to the CMake developer's list, as requested by this bug comment:

Re: [cmake-developers] User vs CMake include mismatch handling

2010-10-19 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:59 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:36 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote: On 10/14/2010 2:18 PM, David Cole wrote: On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at

Re: [cmake-developers] User vs CMake include mismatch handling

2010-10-12 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
2010/10/12 Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: 2010/10/12 Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote

Re: [cmake-developers] User vs CMake include mismatch handling

2010-10-12 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 17:27:31 David Cole wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote: On 10/12/2010 03:32 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Bill Hoffman wrote: Anyway, in the short term, we are going to go with FPHSA2, Alex

Re: [cmake-developers] User vs CMake include mismatch handling

2010-10-11 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Sunday 10 October 2010 14:56:29 Alexander Neundorf wrote: On Friday 08 October 2010, David Cole wrote: On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.orgwrote: ... Better idea: I'll add a policy which switches this behaviour (prefer CMAKE_ROOT over

Re: [cmake-developers] User vs CMake include mismatch handling

2010-10-11 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.orgwrote: On Monday 11 October 2010, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: On Sunday 10 October 2010 14:56:29 Alexander Neundorf wrote: ... So is there no chance of fixing this in a backward compatible way? One of Prefering module