Nicholas Braden wrote:
> Ah, I understand now - I have a habit of forgetting that you can
> configure existing CMake builds by repeatedly invoking cmake. I don't
> know if such a feature exists but it definitely sounds useful.
Yes, that would be another use case!
R.
--
Powered by
Ah, I understand now - I have a habit of forgetting that you can
configure existing CMake builds by repeatedly invoking cmake. I don't
know if such a feature exists but it definitely sounds useful.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:03 PM, René J. V. wrote:
> Nicholas Braden wrote:
Nicholas Braden wrote:
> sense. Could you give an example of when you would find them useful? I
> think maybe I am not understanding what you want.
Yeah, I realise my explanation may not have been very clear.
> If you just want to pass a list of values to a variable on the command
> line,
The command line is the first point where variables can be defined
(all code runs after this), so I am not sure where you expect
pre-existing values to come from in order for a += or -= to make
sense. Could you give an example of when you would find them useful? I
think maybe I am not
Hi,
I've been wondering about something that is a real stumbling block in a
build/distribution system like MacPorts where settings can be modified in any
number of consecutive steps. For instance, depending on what dependencies a
package ("port") requires and how those dependencies are