On 05/06/17 23:50, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Craig Scott wrote:
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Stephen Kelly
wrote:
Roger Leigh wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm currently using this logic to use C++14 with a fallback to C++11
when C++14 is unavailable:
if(NOT CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD)
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Craig Scott wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Stephen Kelly
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Roger Leigh wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi folks,
> >> >
> >> > I'm currently using this logic to use C++14 with a
Craig Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Stephen Kelly
> wrote:
>
>> Roger Leigh wrote:
>>
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > I'm currently using this logic to use C++14 with a fallback to C++11
>> > when C++14 is unavailable:
>> >
>> >if(NOT CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD)
>> >
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'm currently using this logic to use C++14 with a fallback to C++11
> > when C++14 is unavailable:
> >
> >if(NOT CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD)
> > set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 14)
> >
Roger Leigh wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm currently using this logic to use C++14 with a fallback to C++11
> when C++14 is unavailable:
>
>if(NOT CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD)
> set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 14)
>endif()
>if(NOT CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD_REQUIRED)
> set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD_REQUIRED