No, not using bindings, but good point yes, the param type was a typo.
While everything 'seems' to be working now, the info that I got in the
debugger when I was seeing problems looked suspiciously like the state
of things when an object has been released but is then referenced. I
need to
Can someone expand on this a little more please and fill in some blanks
about why the first version isn't KVO compliant and what it is about the
second one which makes KVO work? That second piece of code
[ [ self mutableArrayValueForKey:@fieldArray ] addObjectInFoo ];
is not perhaps the
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Roland King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone expand on this a little more please and fill in some blanks
about why the first version isn't KVO compliant and what it is about the
second one which makes KVO work?
KVO requires that you use the supplied
On May 13, 2008, at 5:41 PM, Roland King wrote:
Can someone expand on this a little more please and fill in some
blanks about why the first version isn't KVO compliant and what it
is about the second one which makes KVO work? That second piece of
code
[ [ self
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Craig Hopson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, the question is, what is the difference between using self. notation
and not? I have declared the properties to retain the objects. The
compiler is happy, I just die at run time when I attempt to access the
contents
Guys,
I think I've been the victim of some side effect that I cannot track
down. With no other changes, I tried again with each style,
[ self.fieldArray addObject:inFoo ];
[ fieldArray addObject:inFoo ];
replacing all occurrences for each test, and both work - what I would
Sorry if this is naïve but I have a quick follow up q (to verify that I am
understanding ObjC correctly). Is it true that:
The two styles seem to me to have slightly different execution paths. The
first:
[self.fieldArray addObject:inFoo]
Would actually invoke the property accessor fieldArray
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Phoenix Draco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry if this is naïve but I have a quick follow up q (to verify that I am
understanding ObjC correctly). Is it true that:
The two styles seem to me to have slightly different execution paths. The
first:
On May 12, 2008, at 15:19, Craig Hopson wrote:
I think I've been the victim of some side effect that I cannot track
down. With no other changes, I tried again with each style,
[ self.fieldArray addObject:inFoo ];
[ fieldArray addObject:inFoo ];
replacing all occurrences for
