If noone is against it, I will request for moving the mailing-lists
tomorrow (before the beta release).
I think we have to move these mailinglists:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did I forget anything?
Carsten
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
It is with real pleasure that I announce that three cocoon committers
were elected members of the ASF in the last round of votation
that ended
today.
Vadim, Sylvain and Carsten (in alphabetical order by their last names)
Hoping that they will accept the
Le Mardi, 24 juin 2003, à 08:31 Europe/Zurich, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit
:
If noone is against it, I will request for moving the mailing-lists
tomorrow (before the beta release).
Do you plan a document explaining the move and how to find the old and
new archives?
I assume there are going to be
Christopher Oliver wrote:
Your experience is the same as mine. The Rhino core needs to be
refactored to be extensible in order to allow multiple interpreters such
as the one that supports continuations.
Ouch. :-/ Do you envision other needs for extended interpreters? I doubt
that the Rhino guys
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le Mardi, 24 juin 2003, à 08:31 Europe/Zurich, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit
:
If noone is against it, I will request for moving the mailing-lists
tomorrow (before the beta release).
Do you plan a document explaining the move and how to find the old and
new
David Crossley wrote:
I propose Reinhard Pötz to be a Cocoon committer.
The summary so far is 21 positive votes and no negative votes.
Is there an official duration that i have to wait before asking
root to set up the account? It has been about 2.5 days so far.
I want to do it ASAP, but don't
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le Mardi, 24 juin 2003, à 08:31 Europe/Zurich, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit
:
If noone is against it, I will request for moving the mailing-lists
tomorrow (before the beta release).
Do you plan a document explaining the move and how to find the old
Le Mardi, 24 juin 2003, à 09:27 Europe/Zurich, Gianugo Rabellino a
écrit :
...AFAIK you have to ask MARC to subscribe to the new lists: by
sending a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject Add a list to
MARC
But won't this create two archives for each list, one with the old and
one with
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
snip/
Do you plan a document explaining the move and how to find the old and
new archives?
No :( - to be honest, I haven't thought about the archives. I thought
that the archives would be somehow moved as well. Hmm, does anyone
know more
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le Mardi, 24 juin 2003, à 09:27 Europe/Zurich, Gianugo Rabellino a écrit :
...AFAIK you have to ask MARC to subscribe to the new lists: by
sending a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject Add a list to
MARC
But won't this create two archives for each list, one
David Crossley wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
snip/
Do you plan a document explaining the move and how to find the old and
new archives?
No :( - to be honest, I haven't thought about the archives. I thought
that the archives would be somehow moved as
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
snip/
Geoff and i both asked that question the last time this issue arose,
Asking Pier if he was sure that there were no side effects. Pier
answered with a flat Yes :-)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-devm=104977664610528
go
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
snip /
and here. If people are already committers for a sub project, there is
no problem if they (or their community) ask for committer access on
Cocoon. Similar like Cocoon/Excalibur.
Cocoon committers don't have commit access on the sub projects, do they?
AFAIK they
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Hmmm, if this is the case, that even Forrest committers has to have this
kind of right.
[RT] Why Forrest is not/does not become a subproject of Cocoon while
it's so heavily based on it?
Definitely something to consider, it makes a lot of sense.
Ciao,
--
Gianugo Rabellino
Jeff Turner wrote:
Michael Wechner wrote:
snip /
If it seems to work and you've got commit access, I'd say just add it
to CVS. People will review the commit log and hopefully spot any big
problems.
ok. But I think I will wait until Cocooners make a decision if
committers from subprojects
On 24/06/2003 10:02 Michael Wechner wrote:
and here. If people are already committers for a sub project, there is
no problem if they (or their community) ask for committer access on
Cocoon. Similar like Cocoon/Excalibur.
Cocoon committers don't have commit access on the sub projects, do they?
On 23.Jun.2003 -- 05:30 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
on 6/22/03 5:06 AM Christian Haul wrote:
Although I don't like to mention it, action are dual use and by removing
special support and restricting access to non-sitemap components they
are completely banned.
Yes, that's the
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Hmmm, if this is the case, that even Forrest committers has to have this
kind of right.
[RT] Why Forrest is not/does not become a subproject of Cocoon while
it's so heavily based on it?
Definitely something to consider, it makes a
Le Mardi, 24 juin 2003, à 09:47 Europe/Zurich, David Crossley a écrit :
...Great, but is that just because MARC is such an excellent provider.
I wonder about the other mail archiving hosts
Which means we must provide some info about the consequences of the
move.
I have added a section on
On Monday, June 23, 2003, at 04:57 AM, Christopher Oliver wrote:
I modified the FOM implementation in the scratchpad to make the FOM
available to the view layer, thinking that the view author also should
see the FOM (See FOM_JavaScriptFlowHelper.java), rather than the raw
Request, Response,
David Crossley wrote, On 24/06/2003 10.23:
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Hmmm, if this is the case, that even Forrest committers has to have this
kind of right.
[RT] Why Forrest is not/does not become a subproject of Cocoon while
it's so heavily based on it?
Definitely
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote, On 24/06/2003 0.53:
on 6/23/03 6:22 AM Steven Noels wrote:
On 23/06/2003 11:18 John Morrison wrote:
Sure! Patches always welcome :)
Technically, all Lenya people have Cocoon CVS commit karma if I read the
avail file correctly.
Hmmm, if this is the case, that even
cziegeler2003/06/24 04:09:34
Modified:site history.html whoweare.html index.html changes.html
site/community members.html
site/news archives.html index.html
src/documentation/content/xdocs/news index.xml
Log:
Adding news
Revision
This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2003-06-24/gump.html
Buildfile: build.xml
platform_props:
compile:
[mkdir] Created dir:
cziegeler2003/06/24 04:31:53
Modified:src/documentation/xdocs book.xml
src/documentation skinconf.xml
Removed: src/documentation/xdocs news.xml
Log:
Moving news to top-level
removing xml.apache.org trail
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +1 -1
cziegeler2003/06/24 04:33:09
Modified:src/documentation/xdocs book.xml
Removed: src/documentation/xdocs news.xml
Log:
Moving news to top-level
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1 -1 cocoon-2.0/src/documentation/xdocs/book.xml
Index: book.xml
As most of you probably saw, there's a thread on cocoon-dev suggesting
that Forrest ought to be a Cocoon subproject, with the consensus being it
makes sense.
AFAICT the only practical difference would be that Cocoon committers
would automatically become Forrest committers. Sounds fine to me.
From: Jeff Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vote 1: Cocoon committers automatically become Forrest committers
+1
Vote 2: Forrest should become a subproject of Cocoon
(http://cocoon.apache.org/forrest)
+0
J.
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Ted Leung wrote:
..cut..
- Organisationally xml and java are still lagging behind;
but have been catching up (though the catch up has slowed down
somewhat due to a much larger influx from the old school
side; and that influx is by average younger than
cziegeler2003/06/24 05:02:41
Modified:src/targets compile-build.xml
Log:
Don't include manifest as a separate file
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +3 -1 cocoon-2.1/src/targets/compile-build.xml
Index: compile-build.xml
Jeff Turner wrote, On 24/06/2003 13.38:
As most of you probably saw, there's a thread on cocoon-dev suggesting
that Forrest ought to be a Cocoon subproject, with the consensus being it
makes sense.
AFAICT the only practical difference would be that Cocoon committers
would automatically become
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Jeff Turner wrote, On 24/06/2003 13.38:
As most of you probably saw, there's a thread on cocoon-dev suggesting
that Forrest ought to be a Cocoon subproject, with the
consensus being it
makes sense.
AFAICT the only practical difference would be that
It was a very nice surprise for me to
find myself among XSLT celebs in this year's
Programmers' Choice Nominations: see below
(and VOTE :-)
http://www.activestate.com/Corporate/ActiveAwards/
--Jacek
PS. I am also delighted to see that XSLTC,
as part of Xalan, now ships in volume
with IBM's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cziegeler2003/06/23 11:18:39
Modified:src/blocks/databases/conf blob.xconf
Log:
Updating to latest excalibur datasource - no more JVM dependency :)
Move BlobSource into databases block
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -1
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
!-- blob pseudo protocol --
-protocol name=blob
class=org.apache.cocoon.components.source.impl.BlobSourceFactory/
+component-instance name=blob
class=org.apache.cocoon.components.source.impl.BlobSourceFactory/
Why this change? Anyways,
cziegeler2003/06/24 05:45:45
Modified:src/blocks/databases/conf blob.xconf
Log:
Correcting configuration - Thanks, Vadim
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -1 cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/databases/conf/blob.xconf
Index: blob.xconf
Hi Team,
where is 2.1beta1? - Well, due to some lack of time, I will
be doing the release either on friday or on monday - I actually
prefer monday as I don't like releasing something on fridays.
Anyway, also this sounds like a bad news (another delay), it's
actually a good one! This gives us
cziegeler2003/06/24 05:55:13
Modified:src/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/source/impl
SitemapSource.java
Log:
Fixing double invocation of internal pipelines
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +1 -7
At 07:38 AM 6/24/2003, you wrote:
Vote 1: Cocoon committers automatically become Forrest committers
+1 except I don't see how we can mandate this if they are not a subproject.
Vote 2: Forrest should become a subproject of Cocoon
(http://cocoon.apache.org/forrest)
+1 if they want to. it seems to
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
Your experience is the same as mine. The Rhino core needs to be
refactored to be extensible in order to allow multiple interpreters such
as the one that supports continuations.
Ouch. :-/ Do you envision other needs for extended interpreters? I doubt
that the Rhino guys
David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
snip/
Do you plan a document explaining the move and how to find the old and
new archives?
No :( - to be honest, I haven't thought about the archives. I thought
that the archives would be somehow
Hi,
I am new to cocoon.
Please give me good cocoon resources on web and alsobooks.
Thanks.David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gururaja H wrote: I am having problem installing cocoon 2.0.4 on Tomcat 4.1.18 on Windows 2000(on Sun J2SDK 1.3.1_08. I have down loaded the prebuilt library and
John Morrison wrote:
From: Jeff Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vote 1: Cocoon committers automatically become Forrest committers
+1
+1
Vote 2: Forrest should become a subproject of Cocoon
(http://cocoon.apache.org/forrest)
+0
+0
J.
-marc=
--
Marc Portier
On 24/06/2003 13:38 Jeff Turner wrote:
I vote +1 and +/-0. Both make sense, but 2) seems slightly more pain than
gain, unless there's some advantage I've overlooked.
+1
/Steven
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java XML Competence
upayavira2003/06/24 08:20:29
Modified:src/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/treeprocessor/sitemap
RedirectToNodeBuilder.java RedirectToURINode.java
src/java/org/apache/cocoon/environment
ForwardRedirector.java
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
Christopher Oliver wrote:
Your experience is the same as mine. The Rhino core needs to be
refactored to be extensible in order to allow multiple interpreters such
as the one that supports continuations.
Ouch. :-/ Do you envision other needs for extended interpreters? I
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
Your experience is the same as mine. The Rhino core needs to be
refactored to be extensible in order to allow multiple interpreters
such
as the one that supports continuations.
Ouch. :-/ Do you envision other needs for extended interpreters? I
cziegeler2003/06/24 09:44:35
Modified:src/java/org/apache/cocoon Main.java Cocoon.java
src/java/org/apache/cocoon/bean CocoonBean.java
Log:
Using ContainerUtil at some places
Formatting code
Removing unneeded code
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +1 -2
cziegeler2003/06/24 09:59:28
Modified:src/scratchpad/garbage/source/java/org/apache/garbage/tree
Evaluation.java TemplateVar.java Attribute.java
LocatedEvents.java LocatedEvent.java Tree.java
Events.java
Christopher Oliver wrote:
OK... I spent some more time with the code and did some steps forward.
Now, unfortunately, I'm stuck due to my ignorance: any further step
would be just a wild bet from my part, and it would take me a lot of
time to get acquainted with all the technologies involved
At 01:00 PM 6/24/2003, Gianugo wrote:
Christopher Oliver wrote:
OK... I spent some more time with the code and did some steps forward.
Now, unfortunately, I'm stuck due to my ignorance: any further step
would be just a wild bet from my part, and it would take me a lot of
time to get acquainted
on 6/24/03 2:24 AM David Crossley wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
I propose Reinhard Pötz to be a Cocoon committer.
The summary so far is 21 positive votes and no negative votes.
Is there an official duration that i have to wait before asking
root to set up the account? It has been about
Geoff Howard wrote:
This is good news. I understand that it's very difficult, but I hope
that it might be easier than you think, and I hope I can somehow help
you in that. Anyway, given that you are the only one showing some
interest, I'm starting to think that I'm just being paranoid...
You
found this at http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/
Michael Kay has released Saxon 7.6, an experimental open source
implementation of large parts of XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 in Java. This
release adds support for XQuery 1.0 as well.
Although I think it would be nice to sync with the Rhino cvs, I can tell
you from personal experience that the Rhino code at cocoondev.org is
more stable than Cocoon itself at this point.
So I think trying to place the blame on Rhino for not using the flow is
misguided.
You also need to take
Jeff Turner wrote:
Vote 1: Cocoon committers automatically become Forrest committers
+1
Vote 2: Forrest should become a subproject of Cocoon
(http://cocoon.apache.org/forrest)
+1
Joerg
Christopher Oliver wrote:
Although I think it would be nice to sync with the Rhino cvs, I can tell
you from personal experience that the Rhino code at cocoondev.org is
more stable than Cocoon itself at this point.
Please understand that my point is not about stability: I'm positive
about the
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
SetAttribute vs Well-formedness:
Briefly, I wanted to check with you people if a functionality like the XSLT
setattribute is required, or the non-well-formedness of Garbage is better
(see previous messages on this thread)... Both approaces
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
I propose Reinhard Pötz to be a Cocoon committer.
The summary so far is 21 positive votes and no negative votes.
Is there an official duration that i have to wait before asking
root to set up the account? It
joerg 2003/06/24 17:55:32
Modified:src/java/org/apache/cocoon/generation
DirectoryGenerator.java
Log:
fixed cache key generation (creating a String from the parameters)
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +28 -4
joerg 2003/06/24 17:58:40
Modified:.status.xml
Log:
fixed cache key generation (creating a String from the parameters)
Revision ChangesPath
1.61 +3 -3 cocoon-2.1/status.xml
Index: status.xml
At 09:29 PM 6/24/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
This is good news. I understand that it's very difficult, but I hope
that it might be easier than you think, and I hope I can somehow help
you in that. Anyway, given that you are the only one showing some
interest, I'm starting to
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
snip/
...Anyway, given that you are the only one showing some
interest, I'm starting to think that I'm just being paranoid...
No, you are definitely not. All the issues that you and Christopher
are attending to are extremely important. I, for one, do not think that
i
On 24/6/03 23:58, Joerg Heinicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
SetAttribute vs Well-formedness:
paragraph
#if {something}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]myClass}
#else
[EMAIL PROTECTED]outerType}
#fi
/paragraph
Think also in the case in which
Jeff Turner wrote:
As most of you probably saw, there's a thread on cocoon-dev suggesting
that Forrest ought to be a Cocoon subproject, with the consensus being it
makes sense.
AFAICT the only practical difference would be that Cocoon committers
would automatically become Forrest
65 matches
Mail list logo
