Re: ValidatingTransformer (WAS RE: TidySerializer)

2003-06-04 Thread Upayavira
On 4 Jun 2003 at 10:28, Conal Tuohy wrote: Joerg Heinicke wrote: Ok, reason accepted :) But what about an extra validating transformer as last pipeline step? Seems to make more sense IMO. YES! This could be VERY useful: a transfomer that could validate the output of some pipeline

RE: ValidatingTransformer (WAS RE: TidySerializer)

2003-06-04 Thread Geissel, Adrian
map:transform type=dtd-validator map:parameter name=dtd value=dtd/stage-1.dtd/ /map:transform Or, perhaps map:transform type=dtd-validator src=dtd/stage-1.dtd/ /Adrian Any e-mail message from the European Central Bank (ECB) is sent in good faith but shall neither be binding nor