(note: [rt]'s are little [RT]s ;)
In Forrest-land, we are using the ResourceExistsAction to handle the
possibility of different input formats. Eg., if index.ehtml or
index.ihtml is present, it will be used in preference to index.xml:
map:match pattern=**.xml
map:act type=resource-exists
Jeff Turner wrote:
(note: [rt]'s are little [RT]s ;)
...
So, can I check this in, deprecate ResourceExistsAction, and we all
live happily ever after?
Check in resource-exists selector: +1.
Deprecate resource-exists action: +0.
What about resource-exists matcher? ;-)
PS: RT: 1st rule of
On 18/03/2003 15:12 Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
PS: RT: 1st rule of sitemap component equivalency: Every action could be
renamed to/rewritten as a matcher
Hehe.
2nd rule: any selection of Matchers can be combined into a Selector :-D
/Steven
--
Steven Noels
Steven Noels wrote:
On 18/03/2003 15:12 Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
PS: RT: 1st rule of sitemap component equivalency: Every action could
be renamed to/rewritten as a matcher
Hehe.
2nd rule: any selection of Matchers can be combined into a Selector :-D
Bzzzt!!! Funny but wrong :)
Matchers have
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Jeff Turner wrote:
(note: [rt]'s are little [RT]s ;)
...
So, can I check this in, deprecate ResourceExistsAction, and we all
live happily ever after?
Check in resource-exists selector: +1.
+1 also.
Deprecate resource-exists action: +0.
+0 also ;-)
What about
On 18/03/2003 15:25 Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
2nd rule: any selection of Matchers can be combined into a Selector :-D
Bzzzt!!! Funny but wrong :)
Matchers have side effect by returning map of values.
Aaargh - you're spoiling my joke :-)
/Steven
--
Steven Noels
Jeff Turner wrote:
Heh.. I think you're right. Matchers, Selectors and Actions are all
switches that can do logic. Actions have an unfair advantage in that
they get passed a SourceResolver. I actually wrote a
ResourceExistsMatcher first, then decided a Selector was more
traditional.
In
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Steven Noels wrote:
On 18/03/2003 15:12 Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
PS: RT: 1st rule of sitemap component equivalency: Every action
could be renamed to/rewritten as a matcher
Hehe.
2nd rule: any selection of Matchers can be combined into a Selector :-D
Bzzzt!!! Funny but
Sylvain Wallez wrote, On 18/03/2003 15.43:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
...
Matchers have side effect by returning map of values.
What about some super-selector (or multi-match ?) that would be
allowed to return sitemap values ?
And make Matchers and Selectors able to use the a MathcerSelectors as a
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote, On 18/03/2003 15.43:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
...
Matchers have side effect by returning map of values.
What about some super-selector (or multi-match ?) that would be
allowed to return sitemap values ?
And make Matchers and Selectors able
10 matches
Mail list logo