As originally proposed by Stefano, the FOM exposes a getComponent(id)
method but not a corresponding releaseComponent(component), as Sylvain
was quick to point out.
I agree with Sylvain that releaseComponent() is indeed needed for
stateful, pooled components.
Btw, I'm sure when Stefano mentioned
Ricardo Rocha wrote:
As originally proposed by Stefano, the FOM exposes a getComponent(id)
method but not a corresponding releaseComponent(component), as Sylvain
was quick to point out.
:-)
I agree with Sylvain that releaseComponent() is indeed needed for
stateful, pooled components.
Btw,
