Re: [CODE4LIB] Open, public standards v. pay per view standards and usage

2009-07-14 Thread William Wueppelmann
That might not be the best analogy. The most commonly-cited reason for Beta losing out to VHS seems to be the initial limitation of Beta to 1-hour tapes, which wasn't enough to record a movie from TV, or to play back a rented one without switching tapes partway through. By the time Beta

Re: [CODE4LIB] Open, public standards v. pay per view standards and usage

2009-07-14 Thread Walter Lewis
William Wueppelmann wrote: [snip] I'm not entirely sure that TCP/IP and the other IETF RFCs became established because of restrictions placed on OSI. I was under the impression that OSI was also insanely complicated and that the IETF standards were much cheaper to implement from a technical

Re: [CODE4LIB] XForms editor for EAD

2009-07-14 Thread Genny Engel
The closest thing I'm aware of is the EAD Toolkit. http://www.cdlib.org/inside/projects/oac/toolkit/ ewg4x...@gmail.com 07/06/09 05:33AM Hi, I'm curious as to whether anyone on the list has worked on or knows about any web-based XForms application for creating and editing EAD Finding Aids.

[CODE4LIB] Metadata Registries Functional Requirements Survey

2009-07-14 Thread Corey A Harper
Dear All, Apologies for the cross-posting. The following survey is being distributed on behalf of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative's Registries Task Group, the Joint Information Steering Committe (JISC) and UKOLN. The goal of the survey is to collect information from Metadata Registry

Re: [CODE4LIB] Open, public standards v. pay per view standards and usage

2009-07-14 Thread Ross Singer
Well, it's not a great example, because I don't have a 'counter-example', but I think it will remain to be seen if ISO 20775 goes anywhere if it, too, remains behind a pay wall. If an open spec were to come along that allowed the transfer of holdings and availability information that was decent