The International Linked Open Data in Libraries, Archives, and Museums
Summit (LOD-LAM) will be held in San Francisco on 2-3 June 2011.
LOD-LAM will convene leaders in their respective areas of expertise
from the humanities and sciences to catalyse practical and actionable
approaches to
Bess,
Good to hear from you! I've been using Jasmine with its jQuery
extensionhttps://github.com/velesin/jasmine-jqueryfor HTML fixtures
and DOM-related expect methods in
tandem with Google's
JsTestDriverhttps://github.com/ibolmo/jasmine-jstd-adapter .
For data fixtures, take a look as Jupiter's
Hi Bess,
+1 for Jasmine. Used to dig blue-ridge for these things, but I don't think
they're maintaining that any more.
Wayne
On 1/27/11 9:37 AM, John Loy loy.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Bess,
Good to hear from you! I've been using Jasmine with its jQuery
Thanks Peter (and everyone), that's what I was fishing for. We haven't
yet gone there, and this whole conversation has been very helpful.
-t
On 1/26/11 6:48 PM, Peter Murray peter.mur...@lyrasis.org wrote:
So that will teach me to post a moderately controversial opinion, then
leave to take the
If the best you can do is an external Handle/PURL set-up, then it is better
than nothing.
I would say that it's SOMETIMES better than nothing. It depends on what you're
doing, what your requirements and goals are. Not every application needs
long-term persistence of URLs -- whether through an
Just like I did last year, I'm requesting folks send me (on or off-list, as
appropriate) issues/questions regarding Solr that I can factor into the session
on Feb. 7 in Bloomington. Suggestions on specifics you'd like covered will be
eagerly accepted and factored in too.
Last year I had a ton
One problem with webdriver (selenium 2) testing is that Firefox can
pop up repeatedly when auto testing which can be really annoying. One
work around is to use a virtual display. Rather than headless testing
you can do something similar on a Linux system by using an X virtual
framebuffer (Xvfb)
I would say that it's SOMETIMES better than nothing. It depends on what
you're doing, what your requirements and goals are. Not every application
needs long-term persistence of URLs -- whether through an 'abstraction
layer' or not. ('abstraction layer' is just an implementation detail to get
2011/1/27 Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu:
If the best you can do is an external Handle/PURL set-up, then it is better
than nothing.
I would say that it's SOMETIMES better than nothing. It depends on what
you're doing, what your requirements and goals are. Not every application
needs
Hi, this has been a really interesting and informative discussion. I wonder if
I might be able to redirect it a bit back to my original question, with the
understanding that, as the discussion has made clear, a PURL or Handle is not
an ideal solution?
If, for the sake of argument, you are
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Pottinger, Hardy J.
pottinge...@umsystem.edu wrote:
If, for the sake of argument, you are dealing with software which provides
permanent URLs (say, for example, DSpace's out-of-the-box use of the Handle
system), would it be desirable to make these persistent
So I was taking ruby-marc out for a spin in irb, and encountered a bit of a
surprise. Running the following:
require 'marc'
reader = MARC::Reader.new('filename.mrc')
reader.each {|record| puts record['245']}
produces the expected result, but every subsequent call to reader.each
{|record| puts
No, that's expected behavior (and how it's always been). You'd need
to do reader.rewind to put your enumerator cursor back to 0 to run
back over the records.
It's basically an IO object (since that's what it expects as input)
and behaves like one.
-Ross.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Cory
Oh, gotcha. Thanks.
C
On Jan 27, 2011, at 2:11 PM, Ross Singer wrote:
No, that's expected behavior (and how it's always been). You'd need
to do reader.rewind to put your enumerator cursor back to 0 to run
back over the records.
It's basically an IO object (since that's what it expects as
14 matches
Mail list logo
