Shape and deliver inclusion of Australia's diverse digital heritage in this
innovative national service.
Guide and contribute to engagement with the public and the research sector.
[Trove](http://trove.nla.gov.au/) is a free-to-the-public national resource
discovery and delivery service which
Hi Bill,
There's a lightweight python client: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sushipy/
(I haven't used it, just know *of* it)
Thanks,
James
James Van Mil
Collections Electronic Resources Librarian
University of Cincinnati Libraries
Telephone: (513)556-1410
vanmi...@ucmail.uc.edu
After further thought, I'm uncomfortable with the word uncomfortable,
and I regret using it. In fact, it doesn't appear in the
anti-harrassment policy at all. I think the essence of the policy is to
provide a safe and non-threatening space. I can only speak for
myself, but I'm not committed
The one I know of is
http://code.google.com/p/sushicounterclient/
which is offered by Serial Solutions. It's a .NET framework.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Van Mil, James (vanmiljf)
vanmi...@ucmail.uc.edu wrote:
Hi Bill,
There's a lightweight python client:
Hey. NISO has a list of SUSHI tools.
http://www.niso.org/workrooms/sushi/tools/
Tom
Any group decision in the past has been done via diebold-o-tron.
No, this is not true, that any group decision has been done via online vote.
Or it's true only in the sense that one only considers it a 'group decision' if
it was done by online vote.
The ONLY decisions that have been done by
From the NISO list, JISC's SUSHI Starter, written in PHP, looks pretty good.
http://cclibweb-4.dmz.cranfield.ac.uk/projects/sushistarters/
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Tom Keays tomke...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey. NISO has a list of SUSHI tools.
http://www.niso.org/workrooms/sushi/tools/
We also have a developers listserv, if you run into any challenges:
http://www.niso.org/lists/sushidevelopers/
(I'm on the SUSHI maintenance committee)
Thanks,
James
James Van Mil
Collections Electronic Resources Librarian
University of Cincinnati Libraries
Telephone: (513)556-1410
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
Any group decision in the past has been done via diebold-o-tron.
No, this is not true, that any group decision has been done via online
vote. Or it's true only in the sense that one only considers it a 'group
Yeah -- I found that right away. Most of what's there appears to be
abandonware.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Tom Keays tomke...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey. NISO has a list of SUSHI tools.
http://www.niso.org/workrooms/sushi/tools/
Tom
--
Bill Dueber
Library Systems Programmer
Any policy that could result in people being removed or banned for
failing to comply warrants a group decision. Unless anyone presumes to
speak for the group, online voting is the only tool we have to make it
official. I understand it's new territory, but does anyone have a
problem with it?
It looks like the Metridoc project might have one:
https://code.google.com/p/metridoc/source/search?q=sushiorigq=sushibtnG=Search+Trunk
No idea if it's working, but I'd be really interested in hearing an update on
Metridoc - if Thomas or anyone else involved is listening.
Jason Stirnaman
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mark A. Matienzo
mark.matie...@gmail.com wrote:
More to the point, no other decision about code4lib in terms of
action or policy has been made ever. This is new territory for us.
It's not really that new. We've voted on tshirts, logos, and whether
or not to
The bottom line is that, technically, code4lib does not, AKAIK, exist.
It's one piece of property, the domain name is in your name.
Everything else is donated or lent.
Code4lib has no formal governance. It is more like a clique than an
organization. The question of whether we want to adopt formal
Hi Jason et al,
No idea if Tommy is about but we've sort of started using Metridoc at NCSU.
I'm serious about that sort of ... It's kind of morphed in the last
little while to become a set of Grails plugins, and I spent a lot of time
fighting with Grails (although I see what they're going for
Hi all~
I was not familiar with the code4lib IRC bot (or irc bot in general for that
matter), and the recent discussion on the listserv made me curious.
BTW I fully support the idea of removing offensive content, and big thanks to
those who have been working on cleaning up those stuff.
In any
On 25/01/13 09:47, Bohyun Kim wrote:
Hi all~
I was not familiar with the code4lib IRC bot (or irc bot in general for that
matter), and the recent discussion on the listserv made me curious.
BTW I fully support the idea of removing offensive content, and big thanks to
those who have been
Determining whether action should be taken on harassment should not be
based on a popularity contest. That would be a fail, and that's what
Karen is right to point out.
No one is suggesting that Code4Lib needs to develop a governance system
or that there need to be any future rules. We just
Looking at that, the only absolutely library-specific content there
appears to be the MARC plugin (which isn't documented in detail).
MARC and not well documented...that sounds about right.
--tr
*
Terry Reese, Associate Professor
Gray Family Chair for
I am uneasy about coming up with a policy for banning people (from
what?) and voting on it, before it's demonstrated that it's even
needed. Can't we just tackle these issues as they come up, in context,
rather than in the abstract?
I share your unease. But deciding to situations in context
Salve!
I am uneasy about coming up with a policy for banning people (from
what?) and voting on it, before it's demonstrated that it's even
needed. Can't we just tackle these issues as they come up, in context,
rather than in the abstract?
Or has a specific issue come up, and I'm just
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Shaun Ellis sha...@princeton.edu wrote:
Determining whether action should be taken on harassment should not be based
on a popularity contest. That would be a fail, and that's what Karen is
right to point out.
I added ABSTENTIONS.txt and OPPOSERS.txt to the
I think that a voting process which involves working both with github, the
issue tracker, and presumably using the network map of branches seems a bit
ornate, puts a barrier to contribution up, and is likely to be confusing.
I think that if a /whatever policy is developed for how does C4L decide
So we have a reasonable policy in place. Can we now tackle the creepy
things as they come up? I am not opposed to voting about this. It just
seems like a crazy thing to do, because I can't imagine anyone would
be opposed to it. But maybe I lack imagination.
//Ed
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:49 PM,
No, it doesn't sound that reasonable to me, actually. There's a code of conduct
which has been developed the way Code4Lib develops things: ie the work's been
done by people who're interested in doing the work. What's special about
anti-harassment that it alone should bear the burden of
Let's talk the practical and the implementation. Kinda tired reading the on
and on and on discussions.
So, um, if I get harrased and I felt threatened, can I beat up that person
senseless first for self-defense, then report the incident to... to whom?
There's on open question on the github [1]
A non-organization without a defined membership can't have votes on
anything. At best it can have straw polls; the decision falls with the
person or people running the service or activity. They can decide to go
with the straw poll, but it's still their decision.
On 1/24/13 4:37 PM, Shaun Ellis
Ranti Junus wrote:
Let's talk the practical and the implementation. Kinda tired reading the on
and on and on discussions.
So, um, if I get harrased and I felt threatened, can I beat up that person
senseless first for self-defense, then report the incident to... to whom?
There's on open
My question has been addressed. Looks like I am allowed to beat first and
then report to Francis (my hero!)
I will leave up to Francis to decide how he would implement the sanction.
thanks,
ranti.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Francis Kayiwa kay...@uic.edu wrote:
Ranti Junus wrote:
If you're harassed to the point that you have to beat the person senseless then
you should strongly consider reporting the incident to the police. Or a lawyer,
in case for some reason the harasser doesn't tell the truth about why they got
beaten senseless and the police end up involved anyway.
On 1/24/2013 5:32 PM, Gary McGath wrote:
A non-organization without a defined membership can't have votes on
anything.
Sure it can, we've DONE it. How can we have done something impossible?
But we do it when we think it's the best way to proceed, the most
efficient way to arriving at the
If it gets to that point it's the police who'll have to decide whether
you were acting in self-defense or not. When things reach the level of
violence or a clear threat, it doesn't matter what the convention policy
is; it's a question of who committed a crime.
Just what are we talking about,
People did raise specific issues with Zoia which can reasonably be fit into the
code of conduct's definition of harassment (many of which have therefore been
addressed) so saying no one has spoken up seems strange. People did speak up.
Some people listened and did something about it; some
Karen - I've been wondering about this lately, digging around in code at
github, noticing a lot of somewhat aging commit dates, etc. I am joining the
ol-tech list and will ask there, too, but given your history with the project,
do you have a sense of whether IA folks might welcome a modest
On Jan 24, 2013, at 6:50 PM, Fitchett, Deborah
deborah.fitch...@lincoln.ac.nz wrote:
People did raise specific issues with Zoia which can reasonably be fit into
the code of conduct's definition of harassment (many of which have therefore
been addressed) so saying no one has spoken up seems
When I quote ~you're spoiling our fun it's at the level of a paraphrase of
one aspect of a synthesis of actual responses. It wasn't by any means the whole
conversation; I don't recall if it was even the whole of any one person's
response; but it was one prominent theme that came out of the
I think iPads are great tools to be used in libraries. Are you guys iRoving
or looking into it?
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Ian Walls iwa...@library.umass.edu wrote:
The original (white) Square reader is unencrypted, and the output can be
read by an app, but you'll need to a) know how to
Com e Code4LibCon at UIC. There are still a couple days left to buy tickets!
http://www.regonline.com/code4lib2013
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Cornel Darden Jr.
corneldarde...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for being rude. I asked a question without first introducing myself.
My name is
38 matches
Mail list logo
