On Feb 25, 2014, at 10:25 AM, Repke de Vries re...@xs4all.nl wrote:
With all due respect: CODE4LIB is a list with international following and
this Welcome thread gets pretty annoying to those outside the CODE4LIB US
Inner Circle.
FWIW, it’s annoying to at least one person inside the US.
Can I just say, how nice it is to read this thread and not see Microsoft
SharePoint mentioned?
Have a great weekend,
//Ed
On Feb 14, 2014, at 3:14 PM, Cary Gordon listu...@chillco.com wrote:
Random comments and crackpot remarks.
---
I like to think of myself as a programer and
Thanks for all the responses about linking finding aids to digital objects
yesterday — it was very helpful! I haven’t done much work (yet) looking to see
what the patterns are. But a few people contacted me asking me to provide the
results. so I have pulled out the examples into a document
On Jan 15, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Kyle Banerjee kyle.baner...@gmail.com wrote:
Plenty of good advice in this thread but don't be afraid to write a
harvester yourself that meets your needs. It's good to avoid reinventing
the wheel, but OAI-PMH is a really easy protocol to work with -- it's the
same
Hi all,
I was wondering if anyone can point me at example(s) of finding aids (either
EAD XML or HTML) that are linked to digital object of some kind. For example a
container list that links to a digital image that is available on the Web.
I’m doing a bit of an informal survey so if you see
Just out of curiosity, does it work for a little bit then stop working? I know
arXiv throttle crawlers, and am not sure if they throttle oai-pmh clients.
Simeon Warner who helps run arXiv has been know to post code4lib, so maybe this
will cross his radar.
In the meantime, could you share your
I remember hearing somewhere that ExifTool is pretty good for extracting image
metadata.
edsu--
Not a naive idea at all. If you have the stomach for it, you could extract the
Subject Heading / Dewey combinations out of say the LC Catalog MARC data [1] to
use as training data for some kind of clustering [2] algorithm. You might even
be able to do something simple like keep a count of the
be interesting to compare that with the
results using all 600-651's.
kc
On 12/10/13, 1:18 PM, Edward Summers wrote:
Not a naive idea at all. If you have the stomach for it, you could extract
the Subject Heading / Dewey combinations out of say the LC Catalog MARC data
[1] to use as training data
up someone at a
major Dewey library like UIUC or Northwestern to see if they might be
willing to provide data to add to what you get from LC.
kyle
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Edward Summers e...@pobox.com wrote:
Not a naive idea at all. If you have the stomach for it, you could
Amazon Web Services (which is probably the most heavily used API on the Web)
use HTTP headers for authentication. But I guess developers typically use
software libraries to access AWS rather than making the HTTP calls directly.
//Ed
Hi Kelley,
Thanks for posting this. When I began work on jobs.code4lib.org I was hoping it
would encourage people to post short term contracts. The thought being that it
may be easier for some institutions to find money for projects than full-time
staff, and it could encourage more open
On Nov 10, 2013, at 5:45 AM, Mitar mmi...@gmail.com wrote:
It is not just about the security of the users but privacy of the
users as well. Internet Archive moved to HTTPS so that nobody could
monitor what their users are accessing.
Yes, this is an extremely important point. It’s also why
Annotorious [1] is a neat little JavaScript library for adding annotations to
an image, and displaying them later. I might be wrong, but it doesn’t appear to
support zoomable images at the moment. I do see there was some cross-project
activity with OpenSeaDragon [2] so maybe asking over there
It is sad to me that converting to PDF for viewing off the Web seems like the
answer. Isn’t there a tiling viewer (like Leaflet) that could be used to render
jpeg derivatives of the original tif files in Omeka?
For an example of using Leaflet (usually used for working with maps) in this
way
On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Jon Stroop jstr...@princeton.edu wrote:
And here's a sample of the server backing OpenSeadragon[2]:
http://goo.gl/Gks6lR
Thanks for sharing that Jon. Did you have to do much to get OpenSeadragon to
talk iiif?
//Ed
I’m having trouble understanding who the user of this content you are putting
into Omeka is, and what you are expecting them to do with it. But, ok …
//Ed
On Nov 8, 2013, at 4:22 PM, Kyle Banerjee kyle.baner...@gmail.com wrote:
It is sad to me that converting to PDF for viewing off the Web
On Mar 23, 2007, at 1:21 AM, Alexander Johannesen wrote:
I suspect most of our patrons are in the latter category, but hey,
we're going to implement
OpenID cross-system soon so at least we're trying. :)
I think experimentation and research are needed in the application of
openid in
If you consider yourself part of the code4lib.org community and have
a blog that isn't on http://planet.code4lib.org please let me know...
//Ed
One more thing to mention (that didn't come up in Athens) is that we
recently installed subversion and trac at code4lib [1]to serve as a
place for folks to drop code and/or documentation as needed.
If you have a project that needs revision control or some wiki space
please drop into #code4lib or
On Feb 25, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Jeremy Frumkin wrote:
Just curious – any reason not to just upload the video to Youtube?
(I’m not
saying this needs to be the only distribution method, but it’s easy
for both
the producer and viewers of the content, and it’s basically free).
Youtube would be good.
The grim reality is we have three distinct systems at the moment:
drupal, pwyky, trac and svn...each with their own authentication
scheme...well trac and svn happen to share the same one.
It would be nice to move to a scenario where there was an openid
layer that made this complexity go away.
On Feb 23, 2007, at 4:24 PM, David J. Fiander wrote:
3 = 4, for sufficiently large values of 3
More like 3 = 4 for people that can't compose and email and count at
the same time :-)
//Ed
On Feb 21, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Daniel Chudnov wrote:
I haven't figured out, though, how to most cleanly update frozen gems
w/r/to the version control repository (svn, in our case). What's the
best way to update the gems if, say, you want to go from a set of
frozen gems from rails-1.1.6 to a new
On Feb 15, 2007, at 7:44 AM, Daniel Chudnov wrote:
What's the proper form: is it copasetic to add your own stuff? How
about replacing something you don't want on the list off with
another? Is there a limit to the number of nominations per author/
blog?
I think it should be OK to add your
On Feb 15, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Binkley, Peter wrote:
So I don't see any problem with nominating your own stuff (as I did,
indirectly), but I'd rather not see nominations removed - you may
not be
the best judge of your own stuff, after all.
+1
I updated
On Feb 4, 2007, at 9:40 AM, Tito Sierra wrote:
If there is not enough interest in a Breakout Session I would be
happy to
do a Lightning Talk on a Best Bets implementation I did that makes
use of
search log analysis, pre and post implementation.
Nice! Can you add it to the nascent list of
On Jan 26, 2007, at 9:31 AM, Jonathan Gorman wrote:
Someone can read through the logs if they want to find out what the
exact
suggestion was.
http://www.code4lib.org/irc-logs/index.php?
date=2007-01-24#930b48ba-329f-4269-a1e3-406fb9cae405
berick's response would go nicely on the back I
On Jan 26, 2007, at 11:25 AM, Emily Lynema wrote:
Even though I didn't vote for this design, I would vote for the
shorter
wording. But I will point out that it seems slightly less than
democratic to have folks choose a design, and then re-do that
design w/o
putting it up for another vote on
On Jan 25, 2007, at 4:04 PM, Joan Starr wrote:
Why didn't the invitation to vote go out to the Code4Lib listserv? I
only found out about it because of Peter's email below.
http://www.mail-archive.com/code4lib%40listserv.nd.edu/msg01085.html
//Ed
On Jan 23, 2007, at 11:34 AM, Binkley, Peter wrote:
Those are impressive salaries! What's the cost of living like in
Washington?
For a recent transplant from Nowheresville, Illinois the real estate
seems wildly overpriced. I've heard this explained to be the result
of lots of people moving
On Jan 23, 2007, at 12:44 PM, Joe Atzberger wrote:
So by law it is limited... but we can hire you anyway?
That wording sure is awkward eh? If you are genuinely interested
there are some more details here:
http://www.loc.gov/hr/employment/index.php?
I forgot to mention that there is also a 5 year position in the
Office for Strategic Initiatives as well [1]. Similar pay range
($93,822.00 - $121,967.00), similar title (Information Technology
Specialist)...but a slightly different (more interesting imho) job
description. I'm led to believe that
There are 2 permanent software development positions open at the
Library of Congress in DC [1]. You'd need to apply before 02/02/2007.
The salary range is 93,822.00 - 121,967.00. The job description
emphasizes Java--but I'm led to believe that while knowledge of Java
is important, the work won't
On Jan 8, 2007, at 8:45 AM, David J. Fiander wrote:
I'm the person that wrote the Evergreen SIP2 code, and will
probably be the
person writing NCIP code in the future. NCIP is a very large, very
complicated standard, so even once work starts on NCIP, it's going
to take
a while to complete.
On Jan 4, 2007, at 3:19 PM, Binkley, Peter wrote:
Wasn't there also some discussion at one point about holding it in
Venice?
yeah, that was tafazzi in #code4lib ...
//Ed
On Jan 5, 2007, at 4:08 PM, John Furfey wrote:
Does anyone know if OCLC, or someone else, maintains a list of the
OCLC
library symbols as a text file?
It's not a text file but there is a web form where you can look up
the symbols:
http://www.oclc.org/contacts/libraries/default.htm
The
This is a long shot, but back when we were planning code4lib2006
someone offered up a venue in London, England for the conference. I
think it was either University of London, but I could be mistaken.
Does anyone recall who this was?
//Ed
On Nov 27, 2006, at 2:37 PM, Bess Sadler wrote:
Comments? Suggestions?
Sounds great! If you get a chance add a story to http://code4lib.org
when things get solidified.
//Ed
On Oct 13, 2006, at 4:06 PM, Casey Durfee wrote:
Jetty's [1] tiny and a breeze to embed.
[1] http://jetty.mortbay.org/
jetty++
//Ed
On Sep 4, 2006, at 7:30 PM, Tim Spalding wrote:
I gather that, although the LC sells the CDs, there are no copyright
or redistribution restrictions—indeed, that companies often resell
them, with minimal value adds. I also gather that libraries generally
don't get these CDs, but rely on OCLC
So a bunch of us in #code4lib are thinking of starting up a book club
to read tech books together, learn from each other in the process,
and hopefully use a bit of peer pressure to propel ourselves into
actually finishing a book.
The first book we're propsing to read is Practical Common Lisp [1]
On Jun 9, 2006, at 3:08 PM, LaJeunesse, Brad wrote:
We've started looking at facilities around here for code4libcon
2007. Some of the qualifications I used in the search:
* space for 150 attendees
* 1 large auditorium for all attendees
* 3 medium-sized meeting rooms (can hold 20 people, for
On Mar 27, 2006, at 11:20 AM, Hickey,Thom wrote:
I've attached a compressed tar file of compact.xsl, compact.css and
mudlumps.xml, a test record. After you've extracted the files to a
directory you should be able to view mudlumps.xml with a browser
and see
the results.
A belated thank you for
On Mar 30, 2006, at 7:12 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
How would you go about doing this sort of analysis? All I have to
start with is my Apache combined access_log files?
I'm not sure about the 'morality' issue, but It might be interesting
to see whether the links are distributed according to
On Mar 27, 2006, at 8:04 AM, Hickey,Thom wrote:
No, I don't think I ever did. I'll clean it up and make it available.
Awesome, thanks Thom!
//Ed
A while back Thom posted [1] some xslt/css for displaying marc-xml
nicely. Does anyone remember if the xslt/css is available somewhere?
//Ed
[1] http://dewey.library.nd.edu/mailing-lists/code4lib/mail/archive/
200502/0325.html
On Mar 19, 2006, at 3:33 PM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
The hack was easy, just a few lines of code. I guess another
enhancement would be access via a Web Services interface. I hacked
links to Amazon.com in there too, but I took them out. Too much.
Neat. While you're in there you might want to
On Mar 18, 2006, at 5:57 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
The searchable interface at the following URL is really a rudimentary
(read, not quite standards compliant) SRU client:
http://dewey.library.nd.edu/mailing-lists/code4lib/mail/archive/
Put another way, the SRU root is:
On Mar 15, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
Both archives are searchable as well as browsable. Lot's of copies
keep stuff safe.
Eric, I seem to remember you slapped a SRU interface over the
archives? Is this still available?
//Ed
On Mar 12, 2006, at 2:04 PM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
Done? See:
http://dewey.library.nd.edu/mailing-lists/code4lib/
Thanks Eric!
//Ed
Would it be possible to get the code4lib discussion list starting to
archive under the 2006 directory?
Also it would be nice to link to http://www.mail-archive.com/
code4lib@listserv.nd.edu/ on the http://dewey.library.nd.edu/mailing-
lists/code4lib/ page indicating that the archives can be
On Mar 9, 2006, at 10:44 AM, Magnus Enger wrote:
But rather than despairing over what we can't do with this
content, maybe we could come up with some creative uses for the
increasing amounts of Open Access materials available in OA
journals and repositories?
I like the sound of that. Do you
On Mar 8, 2006, at 9:16 PM, Kevin S. Clarke wrote:
That's my opinion anyway... not sure this has anything to do with
code.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ whois opinions4lib.org
NOT FOUND
:-)
//Ed
On 2/22/06, Andrew Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry if this was already stated. This sounds like the textualize site
which has what appears to be drupal and then trac/svn. I think
something could be done with just the trac/svn as it has wiki,
bugtracking and source control. The scope of the
55 matches
Mail list logo
