Re: [CODE4LIB] reearch project about feeling stupid in professional communication

2016-03-21 Thread Julie Swierczek
Just to clarify: I wasn't talking about this list only. I am particularly interested in lists related to libraries/archives/museums and technology, but I am also interested in hearing other examples, and about how we have interpreted those examples. (Tell me a story about it!) I think that

Re: [CODE4LIB] Listserv communication

2016-02-26 Thread Julie Swierczek
I just volunteered as a candidate for duty officer, but I had to include one caveat about a bullet point in the duty officer description: I can't IRC well. At all. I would be afraid to monitor IRC and be available to answer questions there because I would be afraid of sending a private

[CODE4LIB] Listserv communication, was RE: Proposed Duty Officer

2016-02-26 Thread Julie Swierczek
I just want to respond to let people know that Kyle and I have been discussing this further through private channels, and we agree on many points. My earlier response was not meant to be a criticism of what Kyle said specifically; rather, I was responding to what I see are the larger

Re: [CODE4LIB] [code4libcon] Proposed Duty Officer

2016-02-25 Thread Julie Swierczek
I want to respond to this discussion. Please note that I quote Kyle here, but I am taking his comments as representative of what many people might be thinking. I am not trying to single out anyone, but these happen to be the words at hand. Kyle said: " For clarity, am I correct in