Thanks for sharing Jason. As someone who has been involved in planning a
number of conferences, I can relate to the author's rant.
Edward
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Jason Griffey wrote:
> Given all of the sturm und drang with this process now, and the
> organizational
Given all of the sturm und drang with this process now, and the
organizational question, this rant resonated with me:
http://www.rebeccamiller-webster.com/2016/06/the-realities-of-organizing-a-community-tech-conference-an-ill-advised-rant/
Enjoy.
:-)
Jason
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:20 AM
+1
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Sarah H
Shealy
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 12:52 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] C4L17 - Potential Venue Shift to LA and Call for
Proposals
+1
I think the timeline
Given what I remember just from the work it took for the program
committee to do our little section I cannot imagine a local planning
committee pulling it off in less time than Brian has outlined, and it
is probably tricky to do it even in that time-frame. Thanks Brian and
the Chattanooga folks
I support the timeline proposed by Brian.
Edward
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Sarah H Shealy wrote:
> +1
>
>
> I think the timeline provided by Brian is reasonable.
>
>
> But it's TN, not NC.
>
>
> Sarah
>
>
> From: Code for Libraries
I wouldn't have even done a vote at all -- I think when we vote on
conference hosts, we are choosing people to steward the conference and make
sure it happens, as good as it can be using their judgement for what that
looks like and how to make it happen. The fact that the NC folks are
attempting
Greetings once more from the Chattanooga Local Planning Committee -
We come with another update regarding the annual Code4Lib conference. After the
announcement of our survey, two other groups immediately reached out about the
possibility of hosting the conference. Of those two, the one that is