One question we haven't asked is if we really need a MIME type for
MARCXML. :)
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 23:28, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
PPS: Yes, it has been asked, and it's pretty obvious to me that we do.
I wasn't asking for technical reasons; I was more having a stab at how
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Alexander Johannesen
alexander.johanne...@gmail.com wrote:
I wasn't asking for technical reasons; I was more having a stab at how
many people use and need MARCXML specifically as compared to a number
of other more used formats. I mean, seriously, you can use
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:48 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MIME Type for MARC, Mods, etc.?
A few points:
1. x- is commonly used in cases when
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MIME Type for MARC, Mods, etc.?
Thanks Ray. marcxml+xml makes sense to me, the name is really arbitrary,
so long as we have _something_ that represents MARC-XML. Glad you are
working on this.
I'm
MARC was registered a long time ago.
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2220.html
Some of the text is a bit dated and could stand some updating.
Patrick is right that an XML schema such as MODS or MARCXML would be text/xml.
Rebecca
Rebecca S. Guenther
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 21:43, Rebecca S Guenther r...@loc.gov wrote:
Patrick is right that an XML schema such as MODS or MARCXML would be text/xml.
I would strongly advise against text/xml, as it is an oxymoron (text
is not XML XML is not text even if it is delivered through a text
protocol),
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Alexander Johannesen
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:00 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MIME Type for MARC, Mods, etc.?
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 21:43, Rebecca S Guenther r...@loc.gov wrote
.
Jonathan
Houghton,Andrew wrote:
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Alexander Johannesen
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:00 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MIME Type for MARC, Mods, etc.?
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 21:43, Rebecca S
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 22:32, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
Didn't we finish having this conversation last week? We talked about all
this stuff being brought up now last week.
We did indeed, and your summary is better than what my retort could
have been; spot on.
I guess it's hard
Actually, re-reading some of the RFCs, I would clarify one thing.
It seems like using unregistered x- MIME type is discouraged, and
instead you are encouraged to use what is (claimed to be) a very quick
and easy and painless process of registering vnd. types. So I'd
encourage LC to
] FW: [CODE4LIB] MIME Type for MARC, Mods, etc.?
Cool! Can you post a response to CODE4LIB?
Thanks,
Jenn
-Original Message-
From: MODS Editorial Committee Forum [mailto:mods...@loc.gov] On Behalf Of
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 6:56 PM
To: mods
Alexander Johannesen wrote:
One question we haven't asked is if we really need a MIME type for MARCXML. :)
PPS: Yes, it has been asked, and it's pretty obvious to me that we do.
Because I write lots of software that will be fetching MARCXML from the
web, and needs to know what it's got.
I am actually rather shocked that it seems that MARC-XML, MODS,
MARC21-binary, do not have registered Internet Content Types (aka MIME
types).
Am I missing something, or is this really so?
Anyone know what the process is for registering such? Anyone want to
help try to do that? I guess we'd
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't the mime type for MARC-XML and MODS be
application/xml, like every other xml file? As for MARC-binary, I can't
say. I don't have any of those files handy.
Ethan
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
I am actually
MARC21 binary has a content-type of application/marc - see
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2220.html.
--
Mark A. Matienzo
Applications Developer, Digital Experience Group
The New York Public Library
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
I am actually rather
Not sure about the binary MARC, but all flavors of xml should be typed to
either text/xml or application/xml, yes?
patrick
On 2/4/09 10:47 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
I am actually rather shocked that it seems that MARC-XML, MODS,
MARC21-binary, do not have registered
His point, though, is that you can't tell the format being used until
you open the document and try to negotiate it that way.
So if you think in terms of content-negotiation and a particular
resource is available in EAD, MARC XML and Dubin Core, you have no way
of expressing that.
Jonathan, this
You CAN use application/xml for any XML, but it's often useful to have a
specific type for your specific content, so the user-agent can know what
to do with it. The convention is to include +xml on the end, so if
the user agent doens't know your specific format, it can fall back to
treating
If anyone does want to work on it, I'd be happy to help. Maybe I'll
contact clay.
The most immediate and clear need I see is for application/marc+xml and
application/mods.
MADS could be useful, I dunno. Not sure if a seperate one would be
needed for MFHD?
With all the effort on making
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries on behalf of Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Wed 2/4/2009 11:01 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MIME Type for MARC, Mods, etc.?
If anyone does want to work on it, I'd be happy to help. Maybe I'll
contact clay.
The most immediate and clear
Message-
From: Code for Libraries on behalf of Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Wed 2/4/2009 11:01 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MIME Type for MARC, Mods, etc.?
If anyone does want to work on it, I'd be happy to help. Maybe I'll
contact clay.
The most immediate and clear
of Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Wed 2/4/2009 11:01 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MIME Type for MARC, Mods, etc.?
If anyone does want to work on it, I'd be happy to help. Maybe I'll
contact clay.
The most immediate and clear need I see is for application/marc+xml and
application/mods
I thought that a type had been defined - thanks, Mark.
Looking at it, it's from 1997 and represents the LC MARC standard at
that time (it says: harmonized USMARC/CANMARC specification, whatever
that is.)
This brings up the usual question of what we mean by MARC -- the
structure or the
value.
But whatever.
/dev
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries on behalf of Ross Singer
Sent: Wed 2/4/2009 12:10 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MIME Type for MARC, Mods, etc.?
Well, except this isn't legal. Parameters are defined by the RFC, so
you can't
24 matches
Mail list logo