-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Jakub Skoczen
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 12:51 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] OASIS SRU and CQL, access to most-current
drafts
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress
- From: Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] OASIS SRU and CQL, access to most-current drafts
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:
Ralph will probably be able to articulate this better than I can
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Kuba
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 4:07 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] OASIS SRU and CQL, access to most-current drafts
Hi,
Does the current draft include any support
On 18 May 2010 15:24, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress r...@loc.gov wrote:
There is no synchronous operation in SRU.
As for federated search .
To digress a moment, you may recall -- I believe it was on this list --
there was discussion (maybe a year ago?) of what that even means and
What terms do you suggest, Mike?
I think we're doomed no matter what with these, after certain
communities started to use federated search and metasearch in
directly opposite ways.
I also was told recently that what is called an accordion in English
is called a bandoneon in Spanish, and
On 18 May 2010 15:24, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress r...@loc.gov
wrote:
There is no synchronous operation in SRU.
Sorry, meant to say no asynchronous .
--Ray
Mike Taylor wrote:
What communities?
All I know is we here on this very list had some people _insisting_
that federated search _really_ meant aggregated index, and meta
search _really_ meant broadcast search, and other people insisting the
opposite. Both sides had citations to the
On 18 May 2010 16:29, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
Mike Taylor wrote:
What communities?
All I know is we here on this very list had some people _insisting_ that
federated search _really_ meant aggregated index, and meta search
_really_ meant broadcast search, and other people
That is quite unfortunate, as we were looking at SRU 2.0 as a possible
candidate for the front-end protocol for Index Data's pazpar2. The
main problem with federate/broadcast/meta (however you want to call it
;) searching is that the back-end databases are scattered in different
locations or
it.)
--Ray
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Kuba
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 12:58 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] OASIS SRU and CQL, access to most-current drafts
That is quite unfortunate, as we were looking at SRU
Jakub Skoczen wrote:
I wonder if someone, like Kuba, could design an 'extended async SRU' on top
of SRU, that is very SRU like, but builds on top of it to add just enough
operations for Kuba's use case area. I think that's the right way to
approach it.
Is there a particular
...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 2:56 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] OASIS SRU and CQL, access to most-current drafts
Jakub Skoczen wrote:
I wonder if someone, like Kuba, could design an 'extended async SRU'
on top of SRU, that is very
.
--Ray
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 2:56 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] OASIS SRU and CQL, access to most-current drafts
Jakub Skoczen wrote:
I
only in a single (hard-coded) parameter.
--Ray
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] OASIS SRU and CQL, access to most-current drafts
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress
14 matches
Mail list logo
