Re: [CODE4LIB] Representing copyright holder in MODS

2011-06-17 Thread Riley, Jenn
I'd probably do: name type=personal namePartTaylor, Mike/namePart role roleTerm type=code authority=marcrelatorcph/roleTerm roleTerm type=text authority=marcrelatorCopyright holder/roleTerm /role /name That could be used either in the

[CODE4LIB] Representing copyright holder in MODS

2011-06-13 Thread Mike Taylor
So far as I can make out from the element descriptions at http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/userguide/origininfo.html and related pages, there seems to be no way to express in MODS who the copyright holder of a work is -- which seems strange, as you CAN state the copyright date. Am I

Re: [CODE4LIB] Representing copyright holder in MODS

2011-06-13 Thread Benjamin Florin
The MODS convention is to add an accessCondition containing copyright information expressed in a more specialized schema. There's an example at: http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/userguide/accesscondition.html The word copyright in copyrightDate in originInfo is a bit of a misdirect in this

Re: [CODE4LIB] Representing copyright holder in MODS

2011-06-13 Thread Mike Taylor
On 13 June 2011 16:58, Benjamin Florin benjamin.flo...@gmail.com wrote: The MODS convention is to add an accessCondition containing copyright information expressed in a more specialized schema. There's an example at:  http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/userguide/accesscondition.html The word

Re: [CODE4LIB] Representing copyright holder in MODS

2011-06-13 Thread Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress
From: Mike Taylor Any thoughts on how I might use this to express the copyright status of the item's abstract? One way, that I have heard discussed (though I don't know if anyone is doing it) is to represent the abstract as part of a related item (type = constituent). The related item could

Re: [CODE4LIB] Representing copyright holder in MODS

2011-06-13 Thread Mike Taylor
On 13 June 2011 18:39, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress r...@loc.gov wrote: From: Mike Taylor Any thoughts on how I might use this to express the copyright status of the item's abstract? One way, that I have heard discussed (though I don't know if anyone is doing it) is to represent the