At Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:46:06 -0400,
Godmar Back [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Min, Eric, and others working in this domain -
have you considered designing your software as a scalable web service
from the get-go, using such frameworks as Google App Engine? You may
be able to use Montepython for
[I forgot to CC: this to the list, I've edited my reply a bit from the
original email to Godmar.]
Hi Godmar, all:
We'd love to do this and may consider doing so in the future.
As we are primarily a research unit doing such services is wonderful
but only when staff have time.
Just FYI, the web
Hi Steve, all:
I'm the key developer of ParsCit. I'm glad to hear your feedback
about what doesn't work with ParsCit. Erik is correct in saying that
we have only trained the system for what data we have correct answers
for, namely computer science. As such it doesn't perform well with
other
Min, Eric, and others working in this domain -
have you considered designing your software as a scalable web service
from the get-go, using such frameworks as Google App Engine? You may
be able to use Montepython for the CRF computations
(http://montepython.sourceforge.net/)
I know Min offers a
I recently became aware of a company that provides what it terms reference
correction software: Inera. This is the company that powers the crossRef
Simple Text Query box (http://www.crossref.org/freeTextQuery).
See http://www.inera.com/refcorrection.shtml for more details
Does anyone on this
Steve,
If you need citation parsing, rather than reference correction, maybe
this will work for you:
http://aye.comp.nus.edu.sg/parsCit/
I haven't had a chance to try it yet, though.
Jason
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Steve Oberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently became aware of a
Jason,
Thanks, yes, I knew of this effort and have actually spent a lot of time
working with this same software (or rather the same underlying software).
But I'm not sure it does enough or does it well enough for me at this point.
I'd like to take a list of one or two, up to hundreds of citations
Just out of curiosity, what makes parscit not optimal for this
purpose? Is it too slow? Not accurate enough?
I ask, as I've thought of doing similar things but haven't explored
the software deeply enough to know if it'd work.
Cheers,
-Nate
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Steve Oberg [EMAIL
Actually, SFX is probably not going to care what the title is.
It's much more likely to care about the ISSN, volume and issue.
Now, if the matching targets are EBSCO or Proquest, you might have a
problem (since they accept inbound OpenURLs from SFX), but I'm not
sure, exactly.
How many of these
Ross,
Actually, SFX is probably not going to care what the title is.
It's much more likely to care about the ISSN, volume and issue.
Yes, true. But linking to full text is only partly the issue when it comes
to using SFX in this way. I also want to ensure that those articles that we
don't
At Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:55:18 -0500,
Steve Oberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One example:
Here's the citation I have in hand:
Noordzij M, Korevaar JC, Boeschoten EW, Dekker FW, Bos WJ, Krediet RT et al.
The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) Guideline for Bone
Metabolism
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Steve Oberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I fully realize how much of a risk that is in terms of reliability and
maintenance. But right now I just want a way to do this in bulk with a high
level of accuracy.
How bad is it, really, if you get some (5%?) bad
12 matches
Mail list logo
