Re: [CODE4LIB] Something completely different

2009-04-09 Thread Mike Taylor
Cloutman, David writes: I'm open to seeing new approaches to the ILS in general. A related question I had the other day, speaking of MARC, is what would an alternative bibliographic data format look like if it was designed with the intent for opening access to the data our ILS systems to

Re: [CODE4LIB] Something completely different

2009-04-09 Thread Joe Atzberger
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Mike Taylor m...@indexdata.com wrote: ... anyway, all of this is far, far away from the point. MARC is old and ugly yes; but then so am I, and I get the job done, just like MARC. That format is responsible for about 0.2% of our difficulties, and replacing it

Re: [CODE4LIB] Something completely different

2009-04-09 Thread Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress
From: Mike Taylor m...@indexdata.com ... anyway, all of this is far, far away from the point. MARC is old and ugly yes; but then so am I, I don't think you're old, Mike. --Ray

Re: [CODE4LIB] Something completely different

2009-04-09 Thread Mike Taylor
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress writes: From: Mike Taylor m...@indexdata.com ... anyway, all of this is far, far away from the point. MARC is old and ugly yes; but then so am I, I don't think you're old, Mike. And _I_ don't think _you're_ ugly. :-) _/|_

[CODE4LIB] Hosted servers

2009-04-09 Thread Mitchell, Erik T.
Hi all, WFU is thinking about moving all of our services to a hosted environment. We have been using a company called MediaTemple for the last year to try a few of our peripheral systems while that has worked well, we are also thinking about hosting our digital storage. Has anyone done this

Re: [CODE4LIB] Something completely different

2009-04-09 Thread Kevin S. Clarke
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Mike Taylor m...@indexdata.com wrote: Cloutman, David writes: I'm open to seeing new approaches to the ILS in general. A related question I had the other day, speaking of MARC, is what would an alternative bibliographic data format look like if it was

Re: [CODE4LIB] Something completely different

2009-04-09 Thread Bill Dueber
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Mike Taylor m...@indexdata.com wrote: I'm not sure what to make of this except to say that Yet Another XML Bibliographic Format is NOT the answer! I recognize that you're being flippant, and yet think there's an important nugget in here. When you say it that

[CODE4LIB] You got it!!!!! Re: [CODE4LIB] Something completely different

2009-04-09 Thread Peter Schlumpf
Bill, You have hit the nail on the head! This is EXACTLY what I am trying to do! It's the underlying stuff that I am trying to get at. Looking at RDF may yield some good ideas. But I am not thinking in terms of RDF or XML, triples, or MARC, standards, or any of that stuff that gets