The program for Elag 2010 is almost completed, but we are still looking
for somebody who would be willing to moderate a workshop on:
'Tweaking search results relevance ranking'
A workshop leader at Elag conferences prepares a starting document that
will help to discuss a topic during the workshop
Karen Coyle wrote:
Quoting Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu:
So there's no way to call an aggregate a Work/Expression _instead of_
a manifestation, if that aggregate is an actual physical item in your
hand.
No, no one said instead of. What the RDA folks (that is, the folks
who
So do you think the marc-hash-to-json proto-spec should suggest that
the encoding HAS to be UTF-8, or should it leave it open to anything
that's legal JSON? (Is there a problem I don't know about with
expressing characters outside of the Basic Multilingual Plane in
UTF-8? Any unicode char
Quoting Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu:
Karen Coyle wrote:
I think the confusion is that I believe there are MORE THAN ONE
wemi element involved in an agregate.
Collected Works of John Doe (Work1)
expressed by: Collected Works of John Doe (first edition) (Expression1)
I hate Groupwise for forcing me to top-post.
Yes, you are right about everything. Limiting MARC-HASH to just UTF8, rather
than supporting the full range of encodings allowed by JSON, probably makes it
easier to generate and parse; it will bloat the size of the format for
characters outside of
Oh, I wasn't actually suggesting limiting to UTF-8 was the right way to
go, I was asking your opinion! It's not at all clear to me, but if your
opinion is that UTF-8 is indeed the right way to go, that's comforting. :)
Bandwidth _does_ matter I think, it's primarily intended as a
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Karen Coyle wrote:
naturally favors the package over the contents. So we'll have some works
that are what users think of as works, and other works that represent the
publisher's package -- which sometimes will be something that makes sense
Joe Hourcle wrote:
The group's two proposals were to model aggregates as works, or as
manifestatons, so RDA seems to be on their own modeling them as
expressions:
See, this is what I don't understa.d As works, or as manifestations??
In the FRBR model, every single manifestation belongs
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Joe Hourcle wrote:
The group's two proposals were to model aggregates as works, or as
manifestatons, so RDA seems to be on their own modeling them as
expressions:
See, this is what I don't understa.d As works, or as manifestations?? In
the
