-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'd suggest that perhaps the confusion arises because This instance is (not)
'valid' according to that ontology. might be inferred from an instance and an
ontology (under certain conditions), and that's the soul of what we're asking
when we define
On 9/16/13 6:29 AM, aj...@virginia.edu wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'd suggest that perhaps the confusion arises because This instance is (not) 'valid'
according to that ontology. might be inferred from an instance and an ontology (under certain
conditions), and
Using SPARQL to validate seems like tremendous overhead. From the Gerber
abstract: A total of 55 rules have been defined representing the
constraints and requirements of the OA Specification and Ontology. For each
rule we have defined a SPARQL query to check compliance. I hope this isn't
55
Ethan, if you are interested in dialoguing about this topic, I suspect
this isn't the forum for it. I don't think that W3C has yet set up a
public list on rdf validation (the meeting participants need to form an
actual W3C group for that to happen, and I hope that won't take too
long), but
