Re: [CODE4LIB] A code4lib journal proposal

2006-02-21 Thread Art Rhyno
This is intriguing, I really like the idea of a publication that would have a high level of technical content, even if only to inspire more folks to consider the IT side of libraries. I would really like to see a low barrier way of capturing the excitement and enthusiasm that came through in the

Re: [CODE4LIB] A code4lib journal proposal

2006-02-21 Thread Ross Singer
Art, I think you make a point here that Rob Sanderson (I think) made in the IRC channel today. We have a Code4lib planet. We have Ariadne and we have D-Lib (and, as we learned last week, we have ITAL). Where would the market for this journal be? Who would read it? Would it just be the same

Re: [CODE4LIB] A code4lib journal proposal

2006-02-21 Thread Art Rhyno
Art, you write more (word count /and/ content) in one blog posting to LibraryCog than my contributions in two journal articles. Thanks Ross, but I still think of Mark Twain's apology for writing long letters because it was so much harder to make them short :-) Maybe journal is a misnomer, since I

Re: [CODE4LIB] A code4lib journal proposal

2006-02-21 Thread Daniel Chudnov
On Feb 21, 2006, at 11:27 PM, Mark Jordan wrote: In other words, http://code4lib.org/ could _be_ the journal but it could be a new type of journal. I'll second this. Four years ago we started /usr/lib/info for roughly this same purpose, and a number of these same people (usual suspects?) were