Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Shale Wiki" for change 
notification.

The following page has been changed by CraigMcClanahan:
http://wiki.apache.org/shale/ShaleViewController

The comment on the change is:
Add some notes about what is changing in 1.0.4

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  == Configuration ==
  
- The jsf configuration files included in the shale-core jarfiles automatically 
registers the necessary shale objects with
+ The jsf configuration files included in the shale-core jarfile automatically 
registers the necessary shale objects with
- the JSF implementation, so no changes need to be made to web.xml; just 
placing the shale jarfile in the webapp's WEB-INF/lib
+ the JSF implementation, so no changes need to be made to web.xml; just 
placing the shale-core jarfile in the webapp's WEB-INF/lib
- directory is sufficient.
+ directory is sufficient.  (NOTE -- as of version 1.0.4, this logic will be 
factored out into the new shale-view jarfile, and this refactoring exists in 
current nightly buids.)
  
  The `ViewViewHandler` class implements the JSF standard `ViewHandler` class. 
It is installed as a wrapper around the `ViewHandler`
  implementation provided by the underlying JSF implementation. It is this 
class that invokes the setPostBack method on the
@@ -30, +30 @@

  which introduces undesirable coupling.
  
  The trunk code as at 2006-11-07 contains some code that appears to support a 
separate ViewController managed bean for each f:subview 
- in the page by overriding the renderer for subviews to invoke preprocess on 
processDecodes and prerender on encodeBegin.
+ in the page by overriding the renderer for subviews to invoke preprocess on 
processDecodes and prerender on encodeBegin.  (NOTE - as of version 1.0.4, 
subview lifecycle events will be fully supported, and this support exists in 
current nightly builds.)
  
  == Tiger ==
  

Reply via email to