What's the status of the sandbox component [clazz]? I believed this to
be a project including reflection utilities, but I might be mistaken.
Is this a different project than what you're suggesting in [reflect]?
As far as [io] is concerned, I'm hoping to submit a patch or two this
week,
Have you thought about putting some links to basic information on attributes
on the site? I am not familiar with what attributes are, but I will
definitly go and look into them!
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Leo Sutic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:55 PM
+1.
(FYI, I am out Wednesday through Sunday or Monday, no email access).
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 14:25
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release of Commons Lang 2.0 [take 2]
In
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22717.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20740.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20740.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22719.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22719.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
rdonkin 2003/08/24 09:53:44
Modified:betwixt/xdocs navigation.xml tasks.xml
betwixt/xdocs/guide reading.xml
Log:
Added documentation about class attribute. This allows an implementation class to be
specified for instantiation during bean reading.
Revision
dfs 2003/08/25 15:29:49
Modified:net/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/ftp/parser
UnixFTPEntryParser.java
net/src/test/org/apache/commons/net/ftp/parser
EnterpriseUnixFTPEntryParserTest.java
In addition to the question of us playing it a bit more by the rules
Again, I never said that you weren't. I was only asking what they were
*here*. :-)
I'd rather not do any deploys until the move from daedelus to minotaur is
complete
Makes sense.
--- Noel
Gary Gregory wrote:
I'll take the blame for causing any confusion on this one since I had
committed these Javadoc changes during the vote, which was made more
difficult due to the extremely long email delays caused by the current batch
of viruses going 'round.
My thought was that we were indeed
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20740.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20740.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22659.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22717.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22719.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ah, well, in that sprit, then comments on
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22719 would be appreciated
but I do not expect this to go in 2.0 unless other folks like/need it.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25,
It'll be on
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/commons-discovery/jars/ somewhere.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Ashish A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 25/08/2003 01:35:07 PM:
I verified that the jar was downloaded. Do you know from where can I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22717.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
dfs 2003/08/25 22:43:56
Modified:net/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/ftp FTP.java
net/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/nntp NNTP.java
net/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/pop3 POP3.java
net/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/smtp SMTP.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22656.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Gary Gregory wrote:
Ah, well, in that sprit, then comments on
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22719 would be appreciated
but I do not expect this to go in 2.0 unless other folks like/need it.
Looks useful to me. I would go ahead and add it. Here are a couple of
small comments:
Inline:
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 23:11
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Commons Lang 2.0 [take 2]
Gary Gregory wrote:
Ah, well, in that sprit, then comments on
Hi,
Maybe I am mistaken but how do you find files according to several
properties (let's say depth AND type) ? I believe you have to build your
own FileSelector implementation.
As I am using commons-vfs in a new project, and as I will eventually
need some kind of composite FileSelector, I am
dirkv 2003/08/26 07:15:02
Modified:pool/src/test/org/apache/commons/pool/impl
TestGenericKeyedObjectPool.java
Log:
test for the new maxTotal feature
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +35 -4
dirkv 2003/08/26 07:16:33
Modified:dbcp/src/java/org/apache/commons/dbcp PoolingConnection.java
Log:
- do not throw NoSuchElementException (runtime) but SQLNestedException
- add todo
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +41 -2
dirkv 2003/08/26 07:19:28
Modified:dbcp/src/java/org/apache/commons/dbcp
BasicDataSourceFactory.java BasicDataSource.java
Log:
Bugzilla Bug 18012: BasicDataSource doesn't include PreparedStmt Pooling
implementation of the requested feature
started
dirkv 2003/08/26 07:20:15
Modified:dbcp/src/test/org/apache/commons/dbcp
TestBasicDataSource.java
Log:
Bugzilla Bug 18012: BasicDataSource doesn't include PreparedStmt Pooling
junit test for the new feature
Revision ChangesPath
1.7
dirkv 2003/08/26 07:14:16
Modified:pool/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl
GenericKeyedObjectPoolFactory.java
GenericKeyedObjectPool.java
Log:
implemented maxTotal feature: ( _totalActive + _totalIdle = _maxTotal)
- when limit
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22664.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
rleland 2003/08/26 09:11:01
Modified:validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator
GenericValidator.java
Log:
Bug#: 21034 Patch submitted by Adam Kramer
Add isInRange for byte and long
Revision ChangesPath
1.27 +32 -8
dirkv 2003/08/26 08:11:42
Modified:pool/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl
GenericKeyedObjectPool.java
Log:
- add synchronized to get/set methods
- reduce synchronized of invalidate method
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +39 -39
rleland 2003/08/26 09:11:48
Modified:validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator
Validator.java
Log:
remove unthrown exceptions from JavaDoc
Revision ChangesPath
1.30 +4 -7
rleland 2003/08/26 09:12:47
Modified:validator/src/test/org/apache/commons/validator
MultipleTests.java
Log:
Replace use of deprecated API elements with
current API calls
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +8 -8
First, let's make sure we keep the subjects on topic, and keep the [lang]
there for anything other than a [VOTE].
Second, shall I tag the current changes to builder/ and lang/ changes.
Unsure if it was all just javadoc chances. Guess I should dig through a
changelog :) Assuming I do, should I go
rleland 2003/08/26 09:08:50
Modified:validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator Field.java
Log:
Remove unneeded cast
Revision ChangesPath
1.24 +5 -5
jakarta-commons/validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator/Field.java
Index: Field.java
dirkv 2003/08/26 09:38:57
Modified:pool/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl
GenericObjectPool.java
Log:
unsynchronize the addObject loop (minIdle)
Revision ChangesPath
1.28 +30 -11
dirkv 2003/08/26 08:00:06
Modified:pool/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl
GenericKeyedObjectPool.java
Log:
use startEvictor method like the GenericObjectPool
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +31 -24
I've got to say that I like the parallelism with the other methods.
For what it's worth, I like: ordinalIndexOf(String str, String searchStr, int ordinal)
-AMT
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 11:27 PM
To: 'Jakarta Commons
rleland 2003/08/26 08:18:56
Modified:validator/src/test/org/apache/commons/validator
MultipleTests.java NameBean.java TestValidator.java
validator-multipletest.xml
Log:
Bug#: 22664, Patches submitted by Mammen Thomas
Add unit tests
dirkv 2003/08/26 07:21:12
Modified:dbcp/doc README.txt
Log:
remove reference to outdated files
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +0 -3 jakarta-commons/dbcp/doc/README.txt
Index: README.txt
===
I counted 2 +1 binding votes,
and 1 +1 votes from another commons committer.
I will cut the release tonight, test it, and upload it to the mirrors
sometime this week.
-Rob
Weird,
Parser didn't complain when it read the xml. Anyway, thanks for fixing that
-AMT
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22664] - Tests for dependent
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Second, shall I tag the current changes to builder/ and lang/ changes.
Unsure if it was all just javadoc chances. Guess I should dig through a
changelog :) Assuming I do, should I go ahead and tag these to 2.0?
+1
All of my changes during the
ordinalIndexOf ain't so bad. I like it more now that I know what it really
means:
ordinal (r'dn-l)
adj.
Being of a specified position in a numbered series: an ordinal rank of
seventh.
Of or relating to a taxonomic order.
n.
An ordinal number.
Ecclesiastical.
A book of instructions for daily
Just for arg's sake:
1) ordinalIndexOf (String str, String searchStr, int ordinal)
2) indexOfOrdinal (String str, String searchStr, int ordinal)
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Arun Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:02
To: Jakarta Commons Developers
--- Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, let's make sure we keep the subjects on topic, and keep the [lang]
there for anything other than a [VOTE].
Second, shall I tag the current changes to builder/ and lang/ changes.
Unsure if it was all just javadoc chances. Guess I should dig
hi rob
could you remember to cc the pmc next time?
every release needs to be approved and this is the most convenient way to
make sure any pmc folks who aren't subscribed to commons-dev get the
chance to veto.
BTW the usual convention in the commons is to prefix [RESULT] to emails of
this
Btw, you might want to hold off on this Robert until the daedalus to
minotaur translation is done. I think there'll be a note to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] soon.
Hen
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Robert Leland wrote:
I counted 2 +1 binding votes,
and 1 +1 votes from another commons committer.
I will
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22736.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I see that a lot of the cookie handling got cleaned up but there's one
behavior that seems broken now.
If I manually set a cookie header on a request (for example, if I'm
proxying a request myself), HttpMethodBase will always clobber it during
addCookieRequestHeader(). I would think that it
Hi Yue,
Just a few additions to what Adrian posted.
On Monday, August 25, 2003, at 12:27 PM, Yue Luo wrote:
2. Do HttpState.addCookies() and HttpState.getCookies() create COPIES
of the cookies or work on the cookie objects directly?
HttpState uses the instances of Cookie that it is given. No
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for the quick response!
My problem is that I don't have a 'Cookie' object. I only have the text
string for the name of the cookie and its value and I couldn't see any
easy way for me to construct up a Cookie object from that... or any
exposed http cookie header (not
OK, before I start with all the points, can you tell me whether the
following strategy may cause the problem?
In Network.java you can see, that the response shorter than 64kB is read
completely, but when it is longer, just first 64kB are read. In both
cases, method.releaseConnection is called.
As long as the connection is released, as it is via
method.releaseConnection(), all is okay.
There are three ways to force a connection close:
1) Create an HttpMethod that either overrides
HttpMethodBase.shouldCloseConnection() to always return true or that
calls
Hi Mike,
Even though it works now, I still do not know any meanings of domain and
host in the NTCredentials's Constructor.
The documentation for this has just recently been updated in CVS.
Essentially, domain is the NT domain you are authenticating with. If you
have your user name in the form
Thank you, Adrian.
So the domain is specific to windows operation system. If I run a
httpclient application in some Unix, I will have to use a NT user account
which is registered in a NT domain and a host.
Another strange thing is happening to my computer. After I disconnect VPN,
so I am
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22655.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22731.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
60 matches
Mail list logo
