[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIGESTER-109?page=comments#action_12446203
]
Simon Kitching commented on DIGESTER-109:
-
I'd be keener to implement support for null classloaders if I could think of a
sane reason for putting
Author: niallp
Date: Wed Nov 1 03:18:01 2006
New Revision: 469857
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=469857
Log:
Javadoc changes only
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils/locale/converters/DecimalLocaleConverter.java
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils/PropertyUtilsBean.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jakarta/commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/beanutils/PropertyUtilsBean.java?view=diffrev=469863r1=469862r2=469863
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VALIDATOR-206?page=comments#action_12446212
]
Niall Pemberton commented on VALIDATOR-206:
---
Validator has a feature to tell it to use the context class loader - can you
see if that resolves your
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-98?page=comments#action_12446226
]
Juha-Matti Toppinen commented on VFS-98:
Thank you for the quick response.
Creating a per-thread FileSystemManager is not very comfortable, because I have
Apologies if this is a duplicate: I sent it in to the list earlier but
didn't see it appear.
There are four Major issues listed against the 1.1 release of
[dbutils].
DBUTILS-1 BeanListHandler and BeanHandler fail to support
java.sql.Date() The reporter of the bug supplied code to fix the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-32?page=all ]
Alan B. Canon updated DBUTILS-32:
-
Attachment: patch.txt
Patch is attached resolving issues as described in previous comments.
Tests fail to build under 1.6, and warning while compiling
Looks good Robert..
Mvgr,
Martin
robert burrell donkin wrote:
i've taken a good look at the code base, tidied up some legal issues and
some bad speiling. looks good. so, i've created a minimal release plan
here: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Betwixt/0.8ReleasePlan.
unless there are
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-32?page=all ]
Alan B. Canon updated DBUTILS-32:
-
Attachment: patch-DBUTILS-32.txt
Sorry, the previous patch addressed two separate issues. The present attachment
resolves only DBUTILS-32 (the present
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-3?page=all ]
Alan B. Canon updated DBUTILS-3:
Attachment: patch-DBUTILS-3.txt
Patch to resolve issue as described in previous comments.
[dbutils] Setting bean properties fails silently
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-1?page=all ]
Alan B. Canon updated DBUTILS-1:
Attachment: patch-DBUTILS-1-and-3.txt
This patch also addresses DBUTILS-3. It may not work if the patch recently
attached to that issue has already been
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-3?page=comments#action_12446287 ]
Alan B. Canon commented on DBUTILS-3:
-
I supplied a patch for DBUTILS-1 which also fixes the present issue. It would
be best to apply the patch for DBUTILS-1,
Speaking of cross-commons, the JCL deps are all over the place. Which
is probably OK for now, since most variants are point releases (1.0,
1.0.2, 1.0.3, 1.0.4 being popular ATM).
Since JCL is the bottom rung of the ladder, we should do our bit and
move as one (i.e. if a component wants to up the
-1 - we don't have the parallel release cycle to pull this off. We'll
all be stuck because commons doodah has no reason to upgrade and no
one active on it.
I'm +1 to upgrading all the dependencies though - I wouldn't even
think it needs a vote. Just dig in and upgrade all the dependencies
you
Author: bayard
Date: Wed Nov 1 09:33:50 2006
New Revision: 470003
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=470003
Log:
Applying Alan Canon's patch for DBUTILS-32
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/dbutils/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/dbutils/BeanProcessor.java
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-32?page=all ]
Henri Yandell resolved DBUTILS-32.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Alan.
svn ci -m Applying Alan Canon's patch for DBUTILS-32
Sending
On 11/1/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1 - we don't have the parallel release cycle to pull this off. We'll
all be stuck because commons doodah has no reason to upgrade and no
one active on it.
snip/
Correct, we can't help doodah. But this vote is really not about a
parallel
Realized I didn't post a closing time, I'll wrap this up Saturday 4th
around 2 PM New York time.
And, if its any surprise ...
[X] +1 Sounds reasonable
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Sounds unreasonable
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 11:59 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
Speaking of cross-commons, the JCL deps are all over the place. Which
is probably OK for now, since most variants are point releases (1.0,
1.0.2, 1.0.3, 1.0.4 being popular ATM).
Since JCL is the bottom rung of the ladder, we should do
On 11/1/06, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 11:59 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
Speaking of cross-commons, the JCL deps are all over the place. Which
is probably OK for now, since most variants are point releases (1.0,
1.0.2, 1.0.3, 1.0.4 being popular ATM).
On 11/1/06, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 11:59 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
Speaking of cross-commons, the JCL deps are all over the place. Which
is probably OK for now, since most variants are point releases (1.0,
1.0.2, 1.0.3, 1.0.4 being popular ATM).
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 15:26 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 11/1/06, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I wasn't implying we require JCL 1.1 now, but that when we do, we
diligently upgrade with each new release (for those components that
release). Otherwise we have Foo that needs
On 11/1/06, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 15:26 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 11/1/06, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I wasn't implying we require JCL 1.1 now, but that when we do, we
diligently upgrade with each new release (for those
On 11/1/06, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 11:59 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
Speaking of cross-commons, the JCL deps are all over the place. Which
is probably OK for now, since most variants are point releases (1.0,
1.0.2, 1.0.3, 1.0.4 being popular ATM).
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VALIDATOR-206?page=comments#action_12446391
]
Anna Komaristaia commented on VALIDATOR-206:
Thanks a lot for your help !
It works after I put in my code
Don't mean to be terse, just lack of time.
On 11/1/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/1/06, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Rahul,
Allow me to look at the situation from a different angle. I think what
is definitely missing is a more formal and a clearly
An attempt at a summary on this topic.
The majority view on the thread was that a major version should not be
mandated to mean a package rename. Instead, the view most widely
expressed was that this should be a component decision.
A second angle to emerge is that a 'large non-compatible
On 11/1/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't mean to be terse, just lack of time.
On 11/1/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/1/06, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Rahul,
Allow me to look at the situation from a different angle. I think what
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-157?page=comments#action_12446407 ]
Remi Arntzen commented on MATH-157:
---
You know you can invert that matrix (it's orthogonal, so just take the
transpose), and you can
also invert the S matrix
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-157?page=comments#action_12446421 ]
Tyler Ward commented on MATH-157:
-
I think I see the confusion. Take a look at my first comment here. You don't
want to invert (or find eigenvectors of) the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-157?page=comments#action_12446423 ]
Tyler Ward commented on MATH-157:
-
Also, about testing. I've found that the best way to test this is just with
random matrices. If you can use, say, 10,000 random
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIGESTER-109?page=comments#action_12446425
]
Henri Yandell commented on DIGESTER-109:
In line with VALIDATOR-206, Digester also has a setUseContextClassLoader(true)
method. So this should also be
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-157?page=comments#action_12446426 ]
Tyler Ward commented on MATH-157:
-
One more thing. I don't think you can just use the Q from the QR reduction
(slipped my mind earlier). Try it, you'll see that it
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-3?page=all ]
Henri Yandell resolved DBUTILS-3.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Oops, bad on my part. Your patch for DBUTILS-32 included this fix and I applied
that part of it without noticing.
So this is resolved as a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-1?page=all ]
Henri Yandell updated DBUTILS-1:
Attachment: Proposed-DBUTILS-1.patch
I think it needs a bit more work to support java.sql.Time and Timestamp, and I
think the code can be expressed a bit
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-31?page=all ]
Henri Yandell updated DBUTILS-31:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1)
fillStatement setNull bug with the Derby JDBC driver
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-17?page=all ]
Henri Yandell updated DBUTILS-17:
-
Attachment: DBUTILS-17.patch
Unit tests and modified class files to resolve this patch.
I'm unsure yet if they should be added. The use-case is to make it
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-27?page=comments#action_12446473 ]
Henri Yandell commented on DBUTILS-27:
--
In comparison to DBUTILS-17, the method name is more focused here (count(..)),
but the method doesn't take care of
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-16?page=comments#action_12446490 ]
Henri Yandell commented on DBUTILS-16:
--
Negative side of this is that it changes the public 1.0 API by removing
toBeanList in a few places. So not usable for
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-16?page=all ]
Henri Yandell updated DBUTILS-16:
-
Attachment: DBUTILS-16.patch
Version of the patch that does not remove the toBeanList methods.
I'm unsure if they should be deprecated - it feels that there
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-30?page=comments#action_12446495 ]
Henri Yandell commented on DBUTILS-30:
--
33477 is now DBUTILS-28.
[dbutils] New ResultSetHandler - ObjectHandler
On 11/1/06, Alan Canon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apologies if this is a duplicate: I sent it in to the list earlier but
didn't see it appear.
Thanks for this work Alan, it's made it a lot easier for me to dig into it.
There are four Major issues listed against the 1.1 release of
[dbutils].
42 matches
Mail list logo
