On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 20:04 +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i was wondering whether a logger could be partially constructed and if
so what the likely effect would be (thread A enters getLogger() and
starts the construction of the logger but is not finished before thread
B enters the
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 21:43 +0100, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 18:01 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote:
BTW dennis should have an apache account by now
Yep I'm here, with a fresh account. I have time to spare on JCL right now.
Fantastic. We may
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 22:46 +0100, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Boris Unckel wrote:
Hello Robert,
robert burrell donkin wrote:
i notice that a lot of the parameters are now declared final (which is -
usually - good). i would have expected that this should not effect
binary compatibility
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 22:49 +0100, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi
I'm testing the Maven generated site for logging and have found some
broken links, that I'd like to fix. Just checking to see if that's OK.
Go for it! Tidying the site stuff is on my list but not started yet, so
you're very
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 23:34 +0100, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hello
Would anyone object if I add the maven-changes-plugin [1] to track
resolved issues in commons-logging? Today resolved issues are entered
into the section Bugs Fixed in RELEASE-NOTES.TXT. I'd like to replace
all text in that
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 23:02 +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
we should really start talking about electing an official release
manager about now.
simon - do you think you'll have the time for this (over the next month
or so) or would you be happier driving the actual work with me
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 23:26 +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
the last JCL release (1.0.4) was back in june 2004. since then a lot of
work has been put in by the commons logging team analysing the
limitations and deficiencies of that release and of the dynamic binding
approach to bridging
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 00:21 +0100, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Simon Kitching wrote:
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 23:34 +0100, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hello
Would anyone object if I add the maven-changes-plugin [1] to track
resolved issues in commons-logging? Today resolved issues are entered
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 23:27 +, Andy McBride wrote:
The log4j team now appear intent on restoring binary compatibility in the
1.3 codebase and are attempting to defer breaking changes to a later 2.0
release.
Thanks for the info.
I'm not sure which incompatible changes in log4j forced
Re the proposed minimal jarfile:
What exactly are the differences between this and the existing
commons-logging-api jarfile?
As far as I can see, commons-logging-api.jar has the Jdk14Logger class
in it, but otherwise is dependency-free.
I vaguely remember comments about api being a mistake
Hi,
I've run clirr to check for any binary incompatibilities between 1.0.4
and 1.1. It did pick up one corner case that I've committed a patch for
(though it was extremely unlikely to bite anyone).
Here's the report if anyone's interested.
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 07:18 +0100, Boris Unckel wrote:
Hello Simon,
NB: I'm hoping to knock JCL1.1 into releasable state over the coming
weekend and hold a vote on creating the first RC.
Please check to put the patch in bug 38174 into RC. Even if you decide
against the logic in the new
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 22:18 +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
on the subject of thread safety, there is a potential issue with
Log4JLogger - take a look at getLogger(). i'd like a second opinion (and
a third and a forth, if possible) so i'll post this now before i analyse
it.
(see
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 21:02 +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
my proposal was to address rebundlers by adding a separate minimal build
into the ant file (no dependencies) and then documenting some
guidelines. if this is done then IMO there's no reason not to ship
cleaner.
You mean create a
Hi,
Given that log4j 1.3 still hasn't released, I would like to revert the
name of the log4J12Logger back to Log4JLogger for the 1.1 release, and
remove the Log4J13Logger.
The name-change will break any config files that explicitly specify that
logger name. That breakage will have to occur
Hi,
When I first proposed the ServletContextCleaner class be bundled with
JCL, there was some opposition.
I was finally convinced this wasn't a good idea by one particular
argument: that it's difficult for rebundlers (eg creating .rpm packages
with the code compiled via gcj) because the servlet
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 10:18 +1100, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
I know the sandbox is meant to be open to any committers on request, but
Niklas is a recent addition to an incubator project, so I thought it is
best to double check with a vote.
Niklas contributed the original Ant refactoring to
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 12:49 -0800, Voytenko, Dmytro wrote:
Hi Simon,
Thanks for the prompt response.
I reviewed the code in the trunc and it looked fine. I'm planning to run
it through the unit tests we have. Unfortunetely, some of the problems
are hard to establish in the Junit
Hi Andrea,
Thanks for your offer of help. I'm sure everyone appreciates that.
However working on a project that you aren't personally using, and which
doesn't have an existing development team, is probably not a good way to
begin.
If you're keen to get involved with the Apache Java community I
Hi Dimitry,
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 16:32 -0800, Voytenko, Dmytro wrote:
Hi,
I'm sorry for repeating the subject if it was discussed already, but I
couldn't find an archive search.
This email is regarding numerous problems with JCL in multi-class-loader
environments. This seems to be a
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 22:42 +0100, Torsten Curdt wrote:
As some projects are not really happy with the JCL
dependency it would be nice to have a simple and
small mock jar ...just to justify the dependency.
Any objections to add this to the JCL codebase
and build system? ...or should that be
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 18:54 -0800, Wade Chandler wrote:
You could always have a wrapper which defaults to JCL.
Then use a static property system and
System.setProperty (for simplicity sake). Need both
for web-apps sake because it's not good to use
System.setProperty in a web-app
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 03:19 +0100, Torsten Curdt wrote:
On 11.12.2005, at 03:14, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 22:42 +0100, Torsten Curdt wrote:
As some projects are not really happy with the JCL
dependency it would be nice to have a simple and
small mock jar ...just
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 21:32 -0500, James Carman wrote:
I don't know if this has ever been discussed or not, but could we not split
JCL up into a bunch of different jars containing the different
implementations? Each implementation jar (one for Log4J, Avalon, JDK14,
etc.) would contain a file
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 09:33 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 12/4/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul is an apache committer who already has commons-sandbox karma and
is interested in contributing to commons proper as well. Let's give
him karma to commons proper.
+1
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-224?page=comments#action_12359135 ]
Simon Kitching commented on JELLY-224:
--
As Paul says, loading the DTD is required, for things like entity definitions
or default attribute definitions. See the xml specs
Hi George,
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 18:41 +0530, Rethesh George wrote:
In our application which uses commons digester library, we are getting
the following issue. We are using the v 1.2 - commons-digester.jar and
this error occurs mainly when the number of users of the application is
very high.
Hi Frank,
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 10:58 -0500, Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
Has any thought been given to, or has any work been done already, to
creating a Javascript-based client-side version of Digester? I'm
starting on a new project soon where I'll potentially have to be doing a
fair amount
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 13:00 +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 08:05 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 22:40 +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 21:04 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote:
snip
Can a new release of CL rule
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 22:40 +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 21:04 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote:
snip
Can a new release of CL rule out all the classloading problems
people had before?
What's currently in SVN head will probably fix 90% of the problems
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 12:48 +0100, Torsten Curdt wrote:
I also talked about removing the commons-logging dependency (which
seemed to be in agreeance at the time),
as at least in our environment we don't use it.
The more I think about this the more I get the opinion we should
also
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 21:14 +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i agree with ceki that the future is static (rather than dynamic)
binding. i prefer bytecode engineering to different compilation.
And I agree with both of you - provided one of the static
implementations provides much of the
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 06:03 -0800, fiji kalathil wrote:
Hi,
i am using commons-net-1.4.0.jar in my proj
i am getting the followinf compilation error
src/com/covad/ccbi/operations/InfBillingOps.java:5347: cannot access
org.apache.commons.net.ftp.FTPClient
[javac] bad class
nb: top-posting, esp. in reply to a thread that already uses
bottom-posting, makes an email *really* hard to read!
On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 22:59 -0500, Jacob Kjome wrote:
Can the problem be restated? Seems like this email catches the end of a
conversation. What is the issue at hand?
This
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 09:24 +, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And do we want to offer 1.3 support, given that 1.3 is still alpha?
I would prefer not to; better to provide a minor release after
log4j 1.3 is released than provide ahead
Hi All,
A week or so ago I was prompted by new activity on the logging topic to
review what is currently sitting in SVN. I think it's actually quite
good, and perhaps we could try to push for a release.
The issues I'm aware of are:
* Do we include the ServletContextListener stuff or not? And if
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 21:39 +0200, Joerg Hohwiller wrote:
Actually I just wanted to tease out what Simon meant with the incompatible
issue between log4j 1.2.x and 1.3.x
I wish I could remember the exact details. If you want them, you could
try searching the log4j developers email archive for
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 10:23 +0200, Joerg Hohwiller wrote:
I suggest you look at the current code again. Log4J12Logger has:
code
// Releases of log4j1.2 = 1.2.12 have
// Priority.TRACE available, earlier
// versions do not. If TRACE is not available, then we have to map
// calls to
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 13:30 +0200, Boris Unckel wrote:
Hello,
Level.Trace was introduced in 1.2.12
http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/api/org/apache/log4j/Level.html#TRACE
You are right. Thanks!
And 1.2.12 is released. As soon as it is in the ibiblio, I will update the
version
Well, rain has unexpectedly started this afternoon, so I've got some
time to talk about this now...
On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 12:49 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 13:30 +0200, Boris Unckel wrote:
Hello,
Level.Trace was introduced in 1.2.12
http
On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 02:47 +0200, Joerg Hohwiller wrote:
As I have checked with offical releases ant seems
to be the master and maven is just there for other reasons (maybe the site
generation).
Yes, this is the case.
Up until now, commons-logging has always been built with Ant, with Maven
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 23:16 +0200, Joerg Hohwiller wrote:
Does this mean that commons-logging 1.0.5 will not be released before
log4j 1.3.0 is released and published at ibiblio?
No, commons-logging is not dependent on the log4j release cycle.
However I have no idea when the next
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 13:13 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 21:10 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 20:44 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
there's been a recent request to cut a new (dated) snapshot from HEAD.
(unless there are objections
[Aargh - I hate top-posting!]
If someone wants to move Digester to Apache XML, I wouldn't object.
However I don't feel particularly motivated to do it myself.
I think the easiest way to deal with this particular case (python/ruby
versions of Digester) is for the ports to be separate projects at
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 20:44 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
there's been a recent request to cut a new (dated) snapshot from HEAD.
(unless there are objections) i'll cut and upload a new dated snapshot
no earlier than 2400 GMT friday 9th september.
Deploying a snapshot to
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 15:52 +0200, Sébastien wrote:
Hi,
I looked at the DTD of digester-rules and I found something strange. It
defines
an attribute named param for the tag object-param-rule. This attribute is
marked as REQUIRED but is never used in the factory... What is its purpose (I
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 19:57 -0400, James Carman wrote:
I finally got everything working and the site on my local machine looks
pretty good. But, it looks horrible on the web! Is there something special
I have to do to get it looking correct?
I would guess that the problem is a missing
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 00:20 +0200, Joerg Hohwiller wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again,
so is everybody only waiting for the complete patch on JCL or are
there further discussions...
Maybe you only had a nice and quiet weekend, however :)
If you agree, just
Hi Don,
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 00:17 -0700, Don Brown wrote:
I'm not sure the policy regarding sandbox projects for one that
already is a member of several commons proper projects, but I figure
it couldn't hurt to ask.
For a Struts project in the sandbox, Ti, I've started playing around
The sandbox is available to any apache committer - but only to apache
committers.
So if an existing apache project is factoring out some code into a
module that other projects can take advantage of then the sandbox is a
good place for that; the existing committers on that project can all
work in
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 23:02 +0200, joerg wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Kitching wrote:
[AARGH - I hate top-posting!]
mmh, whatever you may mean with that (I am not a native englishman)...
Top-posting is where someone replies to an email then puts
[AARGH - I hate top-posting!]
I'm not opposed to this proposal. Commons-logging already creates a
proxy Log object for each underlying real logger object, so at the worst
the name can be remembered at the Log object level as far as I can see.
In other words, this functionality should be possible
On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 15:11 -0700, as wrote:
What is the advantage of Commons Logging over Log4j??
This question really belongs on the user list, not the dev list.
However as you've asked it...
Commons-logging is very important when writing libraries that might be
used in other projects. If
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 13:05 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15519.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED
I thought betwixt people might be interested in this information about
JAXB 2.0...
http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=222
Regards,
Simon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 14:16 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Here's a snippet from the bugzilla help regarding the STATUS of an
issue. It explains it well.
RESOLVED
A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by QA.
From here bugs are either re-opened and become
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 13:46 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. I'm still in favour of putting the correct one from the dist
back.
big +1
Then I suggest that someone call a proper vote on doing this (this
thread isn't really a
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 08:18 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
The [cli] jar issue and other recent discussions on repository@ make
me think that it would be a good idea to start including md5 and/or
sha-1 checksums for release jars in the release distribution tarballs.
While it might be overkill to
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 13:52 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
as many of you probably know, dion is going through a tough time right
now. i've volunteered to cut the release candidate for him (unless
anyone else wants to jump in and take it on).
there are already tags for RC3 and RC4 so
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 09:47 -0600, Kris Nuttycombe wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
As a few of you know, I've been the primary developer on the
commons-pipeline project for a bit over a year now. For the past several
months, the project has languished while I've been occupied with other
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 09:43 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi,
Thorsten and Robert explained the situation to me during the BOF
yesterday, and I hope I have it right. Sorry I haven't followed it
that closely before.
Is it true that the jar on ibiblio has never been an official release?
Hi Sam,
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 19:14 -0700, Sam Gendler wrote:
There is no clue in the commons-email documentation for hows to go
about getting it. The status section claims it is 1.0, it has been
moved out of the sandbox, but clicking on the download link provides
nothing, and there isn't
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 13:54 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote:
Scratch that. Brett pointed out that that may no longer be a valid question.
Has he??
What's the current plan to fix this? Or is it a question of which
plans to focus on?
I assume the easiest (but painful to some set of users)
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 10:46 -0600, Kris Nuttycombe wrote:
Hi, all,
As a few of you know, I've been the primary developer on the
commons-pipeline project for a bit over a year now. For the past several
months, the project has languished while I've been occupied with other
things, but it's
in a critical
condition and has been for more than a week.
Hopefully I'l l get back to it RSN.
On 7/6/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 13:17 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 11:11 +1000, Dion Gillard wrote:
Is everyone ok with me
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 09:55 +0200, Torsten Curdt wrote:
Anyone interested in a jakarta commons
BOF at the ApacheCon?
Go on, gloat! Some day there will be an ApacheCon in New Zealand and I
will send you all invitations to get-togethers, parties and pubs that
*you* can't go to. Hah!! Haha!!!
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 00:43 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
I agree with Stephen and Brett. We *have* to do A, IMHO. The good
jar is what was released. We should not be distributing non-released
jars from java-repository at all, much less non-released jars named to
look like releases.
Well, it
Hi,
Notice of the availability of Release candidate 1 for CLI 1.0.1 was
posted a few days ago. As there have been no objections to the
*contents* of this release candidate, it seems time to put it to an
official vote.
I am aware that a number of people have expressed doubt about whether
there
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 22:58 +0100, sebb wrote:
On 17/07/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Kitching wrote:
I am aware that a number of people have expressed doubt about whether
there should *be* a 1.0.1 release while others have backed it. This vote
is an opportunity
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 19:31 +0200, Mattias Jiderhamn wrote:
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Simon Kitching wrote:
I am aware that a number of people have expressed doubt about whether
there should *be* a 1.0.1 release while others have backed it. This vote
is an opportunity to see which approach
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 19:05 -0400, Steven Caswell wrote:
In NotImplementedException, the getMessage() method has the following code:
public String getMessage() {
if (super.getMessage() != null) {
return super.getMessage();
} else if (cause != null) {
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 08:58 +0200, Mattias Jiderhamn wrote:
#cvs -z3 -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic co
jakarta-commons/resources
cannot mkdir /tmp/cvs-serv32490/./CVS
No space left on device
I kind of get the impression that the disk of the CVS server is full.
Who do I
Hi,
As there was general agreement on getting a 1.0.1 out I have gone ahead
and created a branch based on the CLI_1_0 tag. I have then committed
some build updates in that branch (mostly by copying from Digester).
Unfortunately there's something weird going on with maven's
site-building. The
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 13:24 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ gumpRepositoryIdjakarta/gumpRepositoryId
I don't know what this is used for, but Gump would call it
jakarta-svn, jakarta is the old CVS repo.
Hmm..well, Digester has jakarta here
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 16:54 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm..well, Digester has jakarta here (that's where I got the info
from) and it builds fine in gump. But if you're really sure this
needs to be updated I'll do
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 20:14 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Here are the promised patches. The fixes are as follows:
- Fixes the copy-and-paste errors that I mentioned earlier
- Adds properties to get the correct look-and-feel for the site
- Adds the correct logo [1]
Hi All,
You can find Release Candidate 1 for CLI-1.0.1 at:
http://people.apache.org/~skitching/cli_1_0_1/
This release is a fix for an issue where file commons-cli-1.0.jar on
ibiblio was overwritten some time ago with a snapshot of cli code.
This release contains just a few updates to the
On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 13:58 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
Hi All,
You can find Release Candidate 1 for CLI-1.0.1 at:
http://people.apache.org/~skitching/cli_1_0_1/
This release is a fix for an issue where file commons-cli-1.0.jar on
ibiblio was overwritten some time ago with a snapshot
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 02:26 +0200, Torsten Curdt wrote:
Rob/Torsten, so what's the plan for this? Who's doing what etc?
Anything I can help make happen? Perms etc.
As noted in a separate email, an RC is up for review.
There is one question still to be decided though: do we *delete* the
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 13:00 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is my example xml:
example-xml
tests
test key=abc value=a /
test key=xyz value=b /
/example-xml
Java code snippet:
digester.addObjectCreate(example-xml/tests/, Test.class);
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 17:35 -0400, Farzad Kohantorabi wrote:
Hi all,
Some where in the xml I'm parsing there is an abstract element which
I want to store in a property, I mean with all of its content. For
example, the element might look like:
abstract
Kringles are autonomous structural
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 13:37 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
Betwixt 0.7RC2 (available from
http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt/) has no issues known
to me. since this candidate was released, the only changes made have
been to update the version to 0.7. i would therefore like
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 19:32 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
unfortunately, a new bug has been discovered in betwixt (the optional
add-adders attribute for the addDefaultsRule is buggy see
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-commons-user/200507.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]).
it's
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 21:51 +0200, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
The commons vfs community is happy to announce the availability of
commons-vfs 1.0 RC2.
Please find the RC at
http://people.apache.org/~imario/vfs
The site can be reviewed at
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 22:25 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 21:51 +0200, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
The commons vfs community is happy to announce the availability of
commons-vfs 1.0 RC2.
I've noticed that the main code contains a class called RunTest2
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 12:32 +0200, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Ok, If you think its better to have those tests running (even if they
fail) I will delete the comment from the RELEASE_NOTES.txt.
Well, firstly that's only my opinion that having some tests fail is
better than not running any.
Re
Hi,
As noted here, there is a bad commons-cli-1.0.jar file in circulation.
It would appear that a trunk build somehow got uploaded to ibiblio as
commons-cli-1.0.jar, ie every Maven user whose project depends on
commons-cli 1.0 is actually compiling against a snapshot of unknown
date.
Hi,
As you have seen from the recent storm I've been doing refactoring on
the JCL unit testing process.
It's pretty much done now. The unit test targets part of the build.xml
is now radically smaller. All unit tests except log4j ones are now done
inside the testall target. The log4j ones could
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 23:41 +0100, Rob Oxspring wrote:
Hi,
I just had a go at building from the 1.0 tag and realised that it still
relies on the old commons/build system and uses Apache License 1.1.
I've spent this evening merging changes from the trunk to the 1.x
branch, including both
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 23:41 +0100, Rob Oxspring wrote:
Hi,
I've spent this evening merging changes from the trunk to the 1.x
branch, including both changes that bring it in line with the current
build system and licence requirements AND bugfixes applied to the 1.0
code. I've lined this
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 20:01 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 15:23 +0200, Wolfgang=?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=E4felinger?=
wrote:
Hello,
I just started to use betwixt for reading XML into JavaBeans (is that
called de-serialization?).
I'm using version 0.6 which appears to
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 20:36 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
I am not sure that I have understood the thread(s) above fully, but it
would seem to me that we need to immediately get the correct, signed,
voted, *released* 1.0 jar into *both* java-repository and ibibilo. My
guess would be that via a
Hi All,
As there has been no feedback on the PathableTestSuite stuff I recently
committed I presume it's all acceptable so I'm pressing on with related
changes.
Commit #209252 to build.xml introduces the use of the junit and
batchtest tasks into this file. In the old days, you had two choices
to
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 14:31 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: imario
Date: Tue Jul 5 07:31:14 2005
New Revision: 209279
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=209279view=rev
Log:
upgrade to httpclient 3.0-rc3
dependency
groupIdcommons-httpclient/groupId
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 23:47 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 11:51 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
The memory-leak-in-servlet-engine issue is a common problem and does
need to be addressed one way or another. Taking a wild guess, I would
think that perhaps 50
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 22:17 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 22:00 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
Hi All,
hi simon
As there has been no feedback on the PathableTestSuite stuff I recently
committed I presume it's all acceptable so I'm pressing on with related
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 20:24 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote:
What I like about the *Format name is that it relates it to the
java.text.*Format classes, specifically to the MessageFormat class. From
the MessageFormat javadoc:
MessageFormat provides a means to produce concatenated messages in
Hi Sathish,
On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 11:46 +0530, sathish wrote:
Hi
I am looking out for the jars of some specific components...
It would be more appropriate to ask this question on the USER list than
the development list.
COMMONS-EVENTS
COMMONS-FEEDPARSER
COMMONS-JCI
COMMONS-JJAR
On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 23:53 +0200, Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 7/4/05, Tim O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK, promotion from the sandbox is now just an svn move. This
doesn't help us with components that were promoted before the svn
migration. Does anyone have any objections to svn
201 - 300 of 787 matches
Mail list logo
