[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sebastiaan van Erk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) It would be nice to have formatting of log messages as SLF4J has with
the MessageFormat api. In combination with varargs (java5); this makes
for a really flexible logging mechanism which makes the code much more
Sebastiaan van Erk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) It would be nice to have formatting of log messages as SLF4J has with
the MessageFormat api. In combination with varargs (java5); this makes
for a really flexible logging mechanism which makes the code much more
concise and avoids
Hi,
I just had a quick look at the 2.0.0 api, and there are some features
that seem to be missing which would be really nice to have. For one of
them I already created a JIRA entry a time ago, another one I came
across because I use SLF4J a lot now.
1) It would be nice to have a generic log
Hi Boris,
Boris Unckel wrote on Tuesday, April 03, 2007 6:50 PM:
Hello Simon,
Simon Kitching wrote:
Would you both mind explaining what benefits you see in a new JCL
implementation that cannot be obtained via java.util.logging?
this is possible already today with x4juli, it does have a
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 15:51 +0200, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 19:56 +0100, Boris Unckel wrote:
Hello,
I have seen the recent discussions on JCL 2.0.0 and a version without
autodiscovery.
Someone stated to stop any further development (with good reasons
behind)
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 22:51 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 15:51 +0200, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 19:56 +0100, Boris Unckel wrote:
Hello,
I have seen the recent discussions on JCL 2.0.0 and a version without
autodiscovery.
Someone stated
Hello Simon,
Simon Kitching wrote:
Would you both mind explaining what benefits you see in a new JCL
implementation that cannot be obtained via java.util.logging?
this is possible already today with x4juli, it does have a JCL native
implementation.
I'm no fan of the j.u.l design, but it
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 19:56 +0100, Boris Unckel wrote:
Hello,
I have seen the recent discussions on JCL 2.0.0 and a version without
autodiscovery.
Someone stated to stop any further development (with good reasons
behind) but I am
thinking different.
Please have a look at the (working)
Just briefly scanned through ...but I like that direction!
Only suggestion is to rename commons-logging-api to commons-logging-
core ...it has more than just the API definition in it.
cheers
--
Torsten
On 23.03.2007, at 19:56, Boris Unckel wrote:
Hello,
I have seen the recent
Hello,
I have seen the recent discussions on JCL 2.0.0 and a version without
autodiscovery.
Someone stated to stop any further development (with good reasons
behind) but I am
thinking different.
Please have a look at the (working) code:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGGING-112
It
10 matches
Mail list logo
