RE: [CONFIGURATION] [CfV] Commons Configuration Version 1.0

2004-10-06 Thread Eric Pugh
Please vote now: [X] +1 - Yes [ ] 0 - I don't care [ ] -1 - No - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [CONFIGURATION] [CfV] Commons Configuration Version 1.0

2004-10-06 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Please vote now: [ X ] +1 - Yes [ ] 0 - I don't care [ ] -1 - No Yes, definitely, it's about time ;) Thanks for making this happen, Yoav This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary

Re: [CONFIGURATION] [CfV] Commons Configuration Version 1.0

2004-10-06 Thread Ricardo Gladwell
Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: [ ] +1 - Yes [ ] 0 - I don't care [ +1 ] -1 - No I probably don't get a vote, but I would advise that there are still some changes, for example, to the way that commons-configuration defines exception handling before it is ready for prime-time. As I stated in

Re: [CONFIGURATION] [CfV] Commons Configuration Version 1.0

2004-10-06 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
+1 ! There is still a lot to do but I'm really satisfied with the current state of [configuration]. I can't wait to start implementing the new features :) Emmanuel Bourg Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: Hi, this is the Call for Votes (CfV) for the release of Commons Configuration 1.0. I was

Re: [CONFIGURATION] [CfV] Commons Configuration Version 1.0

2004-10-06 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Ricardo Gladwell wrote: I probably don't get a vote, but I would advise that there are still some changes, for example, to the way that commons-configuration defines exception handling before it is ready for prime-time. As I stated in my previous emails, we should at least make it clear in the