I can see using insertConfigurationAt().. I really see the semantics of CompositeConfiguration as being close to List.. Since under the covers a CompositeConfiguration is just a list..
A patch (plus tests) would be welcome... Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: Gerry Duprey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 5:40 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [configuration] order of compositeconfiguration items > > > Howdy, > > In addition to being able to addConfiguration(), has there > been any thought to > an insertConfigurationAt(Configuration, x)? > > I ask because I'm building up a composite configuration from > several resources > and the order that I build them is from lowest to highest > priority (when > resolving duplicate names). As things are now though, > addConfiguration() > treats the first configuration as the highest priority. > Based on how I need > to load things, this make life difficult (I have to cache all > parts of the > composite configuration into a Vector until done, then run > through the vector > backwards to install them). > > Certainly I can work around it, but a bit more flexibility in > the order > configurations are added/searched in the composite would be > of some benefit. > > Thoughts? > > Gerry > > -- > Gerry Duprey > ________________________________________ > SchoolsOPEN, LLC > 123 North Ashley, Suite 120 > Ann Arbor, MI 48104 > Phone (877) 483-1944 Ext. 401 > Fax (734) 661-0819 > > Visit us Online at www.Schools-OPEN.com > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
