Re: cactus-13-1.5-rc and commons-httpclient-2.0-rc2.jar works on jdk1.4 and above only?

2003-10-30 Thread Ortwin Glück
Personally I think one should not replace a release with a new version without changing its name. This causes confusion. So at least call it RC2-build2 or something like that. To ensure this does not happen again in the future, should we include a check in the build.xml for the JavaC version

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24081] - Manually set 'Cookie' 'Authorization' headers get discarded

2003-10-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24081. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: cactus-13-1.5-rc and commons-httpclient-2.0-rc2.jar works on jdk1.4 and above only?

2003-10-30 Thread Vincent Massol
Non-binding +1 to both suggestions. Thanks -Vincent -Original Message- From: Ortwin Glück [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 October 2003 09:13 To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: Re: cactus-13-1.5-rc and commons-httpclient-2.0-rc2.jar works on jdk1.4 and above only?

Re: cactus-13-1.5-rc and commons-httpclient-2.0-rc2.jar works on jdk1.4 and above only?

2003-10-30 Thread Ingo Brunberg
Personally I think one should not replace a release with a new version without changing its name. This causes confusion. So at least call it RC2-build2 or something like that. It's very common in such cases to append an 'a' to the version. So I suggest you name it -rc2a. Regards, Ingo

HttpRecoverableException

2003-10-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, I'm using the nightly builds version of HttpClient and I have noticed that, when a timeout occurs, neither ConnectTimeoutException nor IOTimeoutException are ever thrown. Instead, HttpConnection.ConnectionTimeoutException and java.net.SocketTimeoutException are thrown in their place. Is

Re: HttpRecoverableException

2003-10-30 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Fabio, HttpConnection.ConnectionTimeoutException should have been replaced with ConnectTimeoutException. It's my oversight, for which I'll provide a fix. IOTimeoutException usually is a wrapper for java.io.InterruptedIOException. I guess the name does not adequately reflect the nature of this