Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And as Troy Poppe mentions, if 35881 is being considered for 1.0 then
perhaps 34056 should be as well.
For what it is worth, I'd -1 the patch by Troy until he fixed up the
[...]
try {
if (StringUtils.isNotEmpty(charset))
{
First off, I'll start with a mea culpa. As one of the people who
picked up commons-email and moved it from commons-sandbox into
commons proper, and a committer on the Turbine project where commons-
email came from, I should have done a better job. My only excuse/
reason was some personal
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 12:14 -0700, Eric Pugh wrote:
First off, I'll start with a mea culpa. As one of the people who
picked up commons-email and moved it from commons-sandbox into
commons proper, and a committer on the Turbine project where commons-
email came from, I should have done a
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 16:34 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 22:25 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
it's rare that any initial release candidate survives scrutiny from the
commons release maestros so i'm sure that an RC6 will have to be rolled
anyway.
i'm just
Hi, I filed an enhancement in Bugzilla today from Sigfried Goeschl
that would be great to get in before the 1.0 release.
It's a very minor API enhancement to make commons email more usable in
environments like fulcrum.
What do you think?
On 7/24/05, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
Commons Users List
Subject: Re: [email] progress on 1.0 release?
Hi, I filed an enhancement in Bugzilla today from Sigfried Goeschl that would be
great to get in before the 1.0 release.
It's a very minor API enhancement to make commons email more usable in
environments like fulcrum.
What do you
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 22:25 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
it's rare that any initial release candidate survives scrutiny from the
commons release maestros so i'm sure that an RC6 will have to be rolled
anyway.
i'm just rolling the cuts for dion so i'd appreciate some guidance on
this
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 08:04 +1000, Dion Gillard wrote:
On 7/24/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi dion
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 21:13 +1000, Dion Gillard wrote:
Yes. I have the source at a point where I'm happy to build an RC and
make it available, however I have very
hi dion
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 21:13 +1000, Dion Gillard wrote:
Yes. I have the source at a point where I'm happy to build an RC and
make it available, however I have very limited time at that moment, as
I'm spending a large amount of time with my father who is in critical
care in hospital.
On 7/24/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi dion
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 21:13 +1000, Dion Gillard wrote:
Yes. I have the source at a point where I'm happy to build an RC and
make it available, however I have very limited time at that moment, as
I'm spending a large
Any plans on this? I'm sure many would like to have a normal release
in their project due to policies etc.
Thanks,
Manos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes. I have the source at a point where I'm happy to build an RC and
make it available, however I have very limited time at that moment, as
I'm spending a large amount of time with my father who is in critical
care in hospital.
Once I have the dist process automated with md5 and gpg signing, and
Is everyone ok with me doing a distribution for 1.0-RC5 and placing it
up for public consumption on people.apache.org/~dion ?
I'm currently going through
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html and making
sure it's all ready.
On 7/4/05, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 11:11 +1000, Dion Gillard wrote:
Is everyone ok with me doing a distribution for 1.0-RC5 and placing it
up for public consumption on people.apache.org/~dion ?
I'm currently going through
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html and making
sure it's all
14 matches
Mail list logo
