On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 09:07:40PM -0700, Henri Yandell wrote:
... except that the ASF would never actually use this document. Legal
affairs
expertise is a limited resource, and if we don't have skin in the game, I'm
hesitant to suggest that it live there.
I'll challenge that one. The
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 09:07:40PM -0700, Henri Yandell wrote:
Find a wiki and start documenting. :)
I've started a page here:
http://wiki.apache.org/general/OpenSourcePolicy
So far, it contains materials from you, Ross, and myself.
The permissions regime material involving supervisors
On 3/29/2011 5:52 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
In my opinion, it's important that the Policy make only one major distinction:
between open source software and proprietary software.
As a practical matter, advocating for particular technologies seems likely to
alienate people at companies
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 06:01:51PM -0500, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Keep in mind, that even open source and proprietary software often
intersect. If the document wants to evangelize an 'all open' solution, so
be it,
I don't think it's desirable to advocate for all open, as it would
