Jay Vyas wrote:
Hi, my j...@apache.org address doesnt seem to be forwarding my emails along.
Any reason why this might be the case?
You can ensure that your registered forwarding address is properly recorded:
https://id.apache.org/
That is explained here:
then instructs
to simply reply to the email. So i did. However my mail
client refuses to send the mail. This sounds similar to
your problem.
So instead, i edited the message before sending, just by
placing a blank line at the top. That was successful.
-David
-Mensagem original-
De: David
Carolina Marques wrote:
I'm trying to subscribe in the user and issue group, that are at this page,
but the confirmation mail is returning to me.
The overall instructions for JMeter mail lists
are at http://jmeter.apache.org/mail.html
Then as explained at http://jmeter.apache.org/mail2.html
Jukka Zitting wrote:
A related point is the delay that our mirror infrastructure puts on
the release process. A security release that gets set up for mirroring
is already publicly available even though it can't under current
policies be announced until 24 hours later. Would it be acceptable
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Shane Curcuru wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I've designed a proposal for the main booth poster (size A2, done in
Inkscape). I'd appreciate some feedback:
http://people.apache.org/~jeremias/asf/
Looks great. I presume that represents *all* the TLP's? I like
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
I'll post here what I've told Noel and others elsewhere.
At ApacheCon Eu two men who attended the Derby BOF said they don't like
to post to user lists because of the flame wars. One went further to say
that he doesn't always have the time to thoroughly research the
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Henning Schmiedehausen a ?crit :
...For example, there are a lot of people that tell me, when they
met me in RL, that my mails sometimes sound very harsh because they
often contain only a single sentence or so..
I don't think one-liners are a problem generally
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
IIRC when the legal-discuss mailing list was first created, the idea of
a legal FAQ for committers was floated preferably written by someone
with legal training. AFAIK this hasn't happened yet.
.
this is something the foundation
, but
are still seeing the delay with publishing the websites.
David Crossley wrote:
[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/ (Look for License FAQ)
So yesterday i linked it into [1]. Hopefully it is now
more obvious. The trouble was that i can't spell american
so the link was broken, fixed now
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Actually, all it takes to veto a change is one PMC member to cast a -1
with a technical justification. The issue is how a community deals with
those vetos, and how progress can be made
Ken, perhaps avoid repetitous questions by
declaring the criteria for list inclusion
on the face of the page.
--David
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
The link is very nice! Can you add the cvs mail lists to see the activity
of them too?
The
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I've been collecting data about the Apache mailing lists for months,
and have finally gotten around to formatting them and making the
results available.
All public ASF lists are now listed, along with some interesting
archive for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Neither is there one
for [EMAIL PROTECTED], but that is used mostly for announcements
that impact all committers.
Yes and committers@ is a mandatory list and not for discussion.
The committers-private@ list would be optional subscription.
--
David Crossley
/committers.html
My approach was to get as much as possible on the /dev/ pages.
However, i wasn't sure about letting the general public know
about the existence of the internal lists.
--
David Crossley
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
--
David Crossley
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for the ASF as a whole.
On which other list is he going to alert us all?
--
David Crossley
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg Stein wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
BTW, i thought that Antonio's alert about another potential M$
attack was warranted. He seems to care for the ASF as a whole.
On which other list is he going to alert us all?
FWIW, the only sensible strategy
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
BTW: Forrestbot is Python? I did not know that,
that is interesting, I'll have to go check it out.
No it is not Python (but you can still check it out).
I was just adding it as one of the other tools.
--
David Crossley
FrontPage to explain that they
need to register. Added a banner to our UserPreferences.
Each project wiki would need to do something similar.
--
David Crossley
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e
stumbled across this
and meant to ask what should happen with it ...
http://www.apache.org/info/support.cgi
There is a reference in the httpd-2.0.49 README.
The site CVS module has the data for that and
the last real update was 2001-12-18
--
David Crossley
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Setting it up is one thing, but maintaining it
and keeping oversight on fake entries, removing
old stuff, is the hard part.
Couldn't it be delegated down to PMCs and its CVS/SVN repo and the
'system' aggregates or links the content centrally
Dave Brondsema wrote:
Does the ASF have a collection of logos?
In particular, we're getting http://forrest.apache.org/ set up and would
like to replace the Apache XML logo with a Foundation logo about the
same size.
All I've found is
Dave Brondsema wrote:
Isn't that just the same as what he has on the URL I posted above? Or
do you suggest creating a logo based on what he has provided?
Ah sorry, i did not check NKB's web page.
Yes that is what i was suggesting. I presume that that
is why he put all the sources in
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
We need to focus on good SA filtering techniques and also try to
minimise our exposure, e.g. removing author tags from javadoc;
obfuscating web pages especially the who.html in each project.
And what makes you think that there aren't
that
someone had used that address when adding me to a page. The other can't be
helped: it is in the KEYS file. You know ... as in:
pub 1024D/23CB7A2A 2004/04/17 David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP key servers are also a list of e-mail addresses for spammers.
It is a classic isn't
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
snip/
But my biggest concern is about false positives.
One solution would be to use spamassassin for tagging purposes only, but
at that point it's much better to let people do the filtering
themselves. There is no reason in wasting precious CPU power for that.
Thanks for starting this discussion Antonio.
A couple of months ago i side-stepped spam by dumping
my old personal email address and moving to a new one.
I also made a bigger effort to use my apache.org address
for all Apache-related stuff.
Since then my only real source of spam is via apache.
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
David Crossley dijo:
I also made a bigger effort to use my apache.org address
for all Apache-related stuff.
I almost never use my apache.org address and I am getting spam. ...
This is what i was intending to say. Not necessarily because of
my use of the apache.org
Brian Behlendorf wrote:
snip/
It's just not that hard to figure out why and how. Go to Google and type
in your email address and see what comes up. In the case of
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 149 separate references come up. ...snip/
..^
:-) thanks, now it is 150 and rising with every
Brian Behlendorf wrote:
...The top hits in both cases come from
marc.theaimsgroup.com.
Actually only two hits, despite my many postings, so
MARC does a great job. Interesting, those two pages
are generated lists of my postings.
The majority of hits were Apache project Who.html pages
and copies
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Brian Behlendorf dijo:
And jeez, lay off the demands on volunteers, already.
Not understand this. Are you asking help? I gladly will volunteer on that.
I suggest to discuss high-level ideas here on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and implementation details on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I added a text file to the committers cvs module to provide
newly elected committers with some background. I recall being
very confused when i was dumped in the deep end.
cvs/committers/docs/resources.txt ... please enhance.
This document lists the various resources available to committers.
Some
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
That map shows only one person in Australia...how are the people
determined?
Do 'cvs checkout committers' and 'cd krell'
See the FAQ. Also there are various past threads
on committers@
I have been feeling very alone, being the only target here.
Especially with
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
The map on:
http://cvs.apache.org/~dirkx/sgala.html
has had a wee enhancement; if you zoom in far enough;...
snip/
I gather that you must be using some browser-specific
facilities here. I use Mozilla and the map is a mess
after the first zoom.
Is there
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
Now I've noticed quite a few folks falling off the shore, and into a
nearby rivers and canals. Which unless you are living on a boad - is
propably not quite correct. So I'd love to know if that is projection
issue; or a true issue with the location you entered.
I
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
Thanks ! - we may need to sync a bit better/more intensive - as I also
have some other WMS perl scripts. And perhaps a joint efford to also fix
things like OGC compliant error reporting (which we do not do right now as
we want http level caching to work in a
Wow, great work Ben and Santiago. I added to the FAQ to explain
geographic co-ordinates. Some people have their latitude and
longitude reversed. The obvious ones are: bdelacretaz, gstein,
jwoolley
--David
Ben Hyde wrote:
I've moved the map here:
http://cvs.apache.org/~bhyde/map.jpg
Ben Hyde wrote:
Rich Bowen wrote:
Where's a good place to get (correct) coordinates?
I got mine off the topo-map in the basement stairway, come on over.
Failing that:
http://www.topozone.com/ -- you have to tinker to get lat/long
http://mapquest.com/ -- preferred by the guys at
David N. Welton wrote:
Ceki Gülcü writes:
What do URLs have to do with Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles?
Does not compute.
Really... who wants to parse up some file, and have a spider visit a
bunch of sites just to get the same information that could have been
put in a file on
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Hi All,
So the news of my unsubscription reached here before I had a chance to
say it.
wiki development should take place on a public mail list where everyone
can participate. I suggest wikidiffs with [PATCH] in the subject. I
personally think more effort
Wow, i just re-confirmed the value of link verification
on all generated Apache docs.
If you are prepared for a shock, then make a simple
speling mistake on one of your URLs ...
apache.org = apche.org
You have been warned.
I almost sent people there to get downloads of Apache
tools from the
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
snip/
That's why I have built a short home page at
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain where I briefly present myself. It's not
about pushing my ego, but about showing who's behind the abstract
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd like to propose each committer to build a simple
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
No, not a PMC. I mean a method for *all* committers of a
project to be able to discuss certain things in private.
Heh, it's the project that rules how the PMC is composed! I will be in
favor of making every committer that wants to be part
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to fully
subscribe
44 matches
Mail list logo
