Re: [OT] How to prevent abusing Apache priviliges

2004-10-17 Thread thorsten
Sorry for starting this thread in two list but I was not sure where to post it in the first place. My intention was not to make noise! If I did I am very sorry for that. I will answer the thread in incubator. spot thorsten El sáb, 16-10-2004 a las 04:53, Roy T. Fielding escribió: A few

Re: [OT] How to prevent abusing Apache priviliges

2004-10-16 Thread Roy T . Fielding
A few weeks ago, many people encouraged Niclas Hedhman not to bring private matters into the public here. Now, some people want this issue brought into public, whereas others say it should be handled only with the Incubator PMC, or possibly the Board. The general at incubator mailing list is a

[OT] How to prevent abusing Apache priviliges

2004-10-15 Thread thorsten
Hello lists, what if incubating mentors would abuse their powers to interfer with the normal evolution of Apache incubation projects. I think that mentors could write off-list mails to possible committers and discourage them to committ to a incubating projects. On the end this mentor could

Re: [OT] How to prevent abusing Apache priviliges

2004-10-15 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
Do you have a concrete case for this or is this just blue-skying? Regards Henning On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 02:11, thorsten wrote: Hello lists, what if incubating mentors would abuse their powers to interfer with the normal evolution of Apache incubation projects. I

Re: [OT] How to prevent abusing Apache priviliges

2004-10-15 Thread Steven Noels
On 15 Oct 2004, at 02:11, thorsten wrote: what if incubating mentors would abuse their powers to interfer with the normal evolution of Apache incubation projects. Hm. That's quite some statement to make. Any fact to back that up? Of course, this could and should not happen - ever. But seriously:

Re: [OT] How to prevent abusing Apache priviliges

2004-10-15 Thread Dave Brondsema
Steven Noels wrote: On 15 Oct 2004, at 02:11, thorsten wrote: what if incubating mentors would abuse their powers to interfer with the normal evolution of Apache incubation projects. Hm. That's quite some statement to make. Any fact to back that up? Of course, this could and should not happen -