Casey Borders wrote:
What would be the feasibility of loading the OpenMoko operating system on to
another smart phone, like, say the Nokia n95.
Well, one of the reasons for OpenMoko is that it is _very_ hard to bring the
Linux operating system to closed hardware, i.e. without vendor support.
On Thursday 10 May 2007 09:15:08 Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
In short, if the hardware is open enough to get Linux running with all
peripherals supported, then the upper layers are no problem (except minor
touches to accomodate for display resolution, different GSM modem, buttons,
LEDs,
Nicolas Bougues wrote:
On Thursday 10 May 2007 09:15:08 Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
In short, if the hardware is open enough to get Linux running with all
peripherals supported, then the upper layers are no problem (except minor
touches to accomodate for display resolution, different GSM
I think (hope?) it is the new appearance of Savaje platform (+ JavaFX
scripting).
That's correct. This is going to be very cool stuff. And the Neo is
definitely very high on the list of devices I want to see this running
on.
If I understand correctly, JavaFX Script is going to be open
Small battery-powered USB charger:
http://www.ladyada.net/make/mintyboost/
I assume above should be able to charge Neo1973?
Battery-Powered 4-Port USB Hub:
http://www.amazon.com/Cyber-Power-Battery-Powered-CP-H420MP/dp/B0002UQALQ
I suspect above can't be used to charge, only for connecting USB
Sorry, accidentally sent this before I had written it:
Small battery-powered USB charger:
http://www.ladyada.net/make/mintyboost/
I assume above should be able to charge Neo1973?
Battery-Powered 4-Port USB Hub:
http://www.amazon.com/Cyber-Power-Battery-Powered-CP-H420MP/dp/B0002UQALQ
I suspect
Battery-Powered 4-Port USB Hub:
Yes. Has already been discussed; in fact it's quite big and ugly; the
dream would be the expansion back idea: some sort of battery-powered
usb hub + IO extender
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Expansion_Back
Sander van Grieken wrote:
I think (hope?) it is the new appearance of Savaje platform (+ JavaFX
scripting).
That's correct. This is going to be very cool stuff. And the Neo is
definitely very high on the list of devices I want to see this running
on.
If I understand correctly, JavaFX Script
Sander van Grieken wrote:
I think (hope?) it is the new appearance of Savaje platform (+ JavaFX
scripting).
That's correct. This is going to be very cool stuff. And the Neo is
definitely very high on the list of devices I want to see this running
on.
If I understand correctly, JavaFX
Sander van Grieken wrote:
I think (hope?) it is the new appearance of Savaje platform (+ JavaFX
scripting).
That's correct. This is going to be very cool stuff. And the Neo is
definitely very high on the list of devices I want to see this running
on.
If I understand correctly, JavaFX
On 5/10/07, Aloril [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Small battery-powered USB charger:
http://www.ladyada.net/make/mintyboost/
I assume above should be able to charge Neo1973?
No it won't be able to charge the Neo1973, since it doesn't identify itself
as a USB2.0 host.
Hence, the Neo will only draw
Frank Coenen wrote:
On 5/10/07, *Aloril* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Small battery-powered USB charger:
http://www.ladyada.net/make/mintyboost/
I assume above should be able to charge Neo1973?
No it won't be able to charge the Neo1973, since it doesn't
Sander van Grieken wrote:
Sander van Grieken wrote:
I think (hope?) it is the new appearance of Savaje platform (+ JavaFX
scripting).
That's correct. This is going to be very cool stuff. And the Neo is
definitely very high on the list of devices I want to see this running
on.
If I understand
Somehow that doesn't sound right to me. Like in the movies, when they try to
hack a computer: there is always some OVERWRITE command, that doesn't
require a password but will grand you access to all the files.
Same applies here. Why put a safety-measure in place if you plan to ignore
it anyway?
I know its bad form to respond to one's own posting, but watch the end
of the 'webcast' around the 15:00 mark, just after McNealy gets up to
talk about Curriki, and then compares Rich Green to Jobs, where Jonathan
Schwartz turns to ask Rich Green:
JS: Rich, how would you feel about someone
Frank Coenen wrote:
Somehow that doesn't sound right to me. Like in the movies, when they
try to hack a computer: there is always some OVERWRITE command, that
doesn't require a password but will grand you access to all the files.
Same applies here. Why put a safety-measure in place if you
Frank Coenen writes:
On 5/10/07, Aloril [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Small battery-powered USB charger:
http://www.ladyada.net/make/mintyboost/
I assume above should be able to charge Neo1973?
No it won't be able to charge the Neo1973, since it doesn't identify itself
as a USB2.0 host.
Hence,
Ian Stirling writes:
Unless you apply the soon-to-be-created patch that someone (maybe me)
will write that draws 500mA anyway, if the host does not talk USB1 to us
in 10 seconds.
Maybe even with a confirmation dialog box.
But a USB 2.0 host will talk 1.1 quite happily...
Does this mean there will be non-open sourced parts in the stack
necessary
to use JavaFX Script?
Sun has already said that JavaFX Mobile (the stuff you need for the
phone) will be GPLed.
So.. no.
Well, this is not exactly true. Sun indeed said explicitly that
JavaFX-Script will be GPLd,
Hey
After spending a day or so working over my P1, I have to ask if the
TaskManager is slated for removal or improvement. It is the single worst
component of user interface on the whole device...
- switching apps on every other platform is a single click on the task name
- selecting the
btw: That's only works if the port you connect to allows high power
devices. Most laptops have only one physical port which will let you
enumerate as a high power device, and sometimes even that port only allows
it when you're plugged in. So, hopefully the phone will be able to attempt
Steven Milburn writes:
btw: That's only works if the port you connect to allows high power
devices. Most laptops have only one physical port which will let you
enumerate as a high power device, and sometimes even that port only allows
it when you're plugged in. So, hopefully the phone will be
Shawn,
I have been very involved in this area at Sun now for a couple of
years. Let me add come comments:
Hardware accelerated Java is actually fairly common already, at
least in the Java ME space using ARM's Jazelle technology. It does
have some benefits in very constrained platforms but in
yowza!
Looks like our favorite Web browser is about to go mobile. Mozilla head
honcho, Mitchell Baker, told the folks at APC magazine that Mozilla is
working on a Firefox to go for your cellphone. It's a long-term project
(meaning it's not coming out any time
Jon
2. Make the lower-left-corner button bring up a popup menu with each
application listed and an X after each name if you wanted to close it.
Brad, this is still at the development stages, so it is really up to us
to fix it. Could you please contribute some code, mockups, etc, to help
Terrence Barr - Evangelist, Java Mobile Embedded wrote:
Shawn,
I have been very involved in this area at Sun now for a couple of
years. Let me add come comments:
Hardware accelerated Java is actually fairly common already, at
least in the Java ME space using ARM's Jazelle technology. It does
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 18:22 -0600, Brad Midgley wrote:
Jon
2. Make the lower-left-corner button bring up a popup menu
with each
application listed and an X after each name if you wanted to
close it.
Brad, this is still at the
If it's anything like mozilla/firefox now, we're gonna need a hefty
battery, hugely more cpu, and about 1G of ram onboard.
I used to love FF, now it's just a cpu/ram hog that usually gets killed
by the kernel every 36-48 hours for taking about 2G of ram.
The mozilla team needs to figure out how
28 matches
Mail list logo
