In Italy there is an operator that give GPRS / UMTS / HSDPA with the
same tariff:
500 Megabyte/Month - 20 Eur (after the first renew it become 1 Gbyte,
and you can renew it more time in a month)
It is not too expensive, for who do't have a broadband connection,
because here a bb connection
To all those who are frustrated.
First of all, please note the recent message from Steve that the
Freerunner is already in production rampup (PVT), i.e. the hardware
engineering phase is finished. Usually this means just weeks and no
longer months until sales can start.
But taking your
Hi,
You really should host your pictures on your own server and not include
it out of a forum.
(e.g. picture
http://www.oesf.org/forum/index.php?act=attachtype=postid=5358 is used
in http://www.handheld-linux.com/wiki.php?page=Letux%20380 )
So users have to register in that forum to see the
Ooops... Must have been done while having some blackout...
Am 08.04.2008 um 09:27 schrieb Kevin Zuber:
Hi,
You really should host your pictures on your own server and not
include
it out of a forum.
(e.g. picture
http://www.oesf.org/forum/index.php?act=attachtype=postid=5358 is
used
in
On Monday 07 April 2008 12:13:17 Mikko Rauhala wrote:
ma, 2008-04-07 kello 11:24 +0200, Erland Lewin kirjoitti:
IMHO, the Opera Mini design (compressing and optimizing web pages
before sending them to the phone) is excellent, because it saves
traffic (=money) and speeds up loading.
I'm
On ti, 2008-04-08 at 11:30 +0200, Sander van Grieken wrote:
Over the last weekend, I've been working a bit on a prototype proxy
doing streaming html/xml diffs (dubbed mldiffs) based on a shared cache,
largely as described here: http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Server:WebProxy
improvement: it
Am Di 8. April 2008 schrieb Mikko Rauhala:
On ti, 2008-04-08 at 11:30 +0200, Sander van Grieken wrote:
Over the last weekend, I've been working a bit on a prototype proxy
doing streaming html/xml diffs (dubbed mldiffs) based on a shared cache,
largely as described here:
Does anyone know if it is legal (in the standard TOS) with providers
(such as ATnT) to send data over a normal phone call?
I have plenty of cell minutes (not to mention free calls between certain
numbers...) but I dont want to pay for a data planso I figure if I
wanted to, I could just have
I don't know about specific cases, but I think that cell phone
companies are more concerned about people using VOIP over data over
gsm voice calls.
There was talk earlier about writing a fax program that uses incoming
calls to receive faxes, and that GSM couldn't transmit decent faxes
because of
On ti, 2008-04-08 at 10:22 -0400, Dan Staley wrote:
I have plenty of cell minutes (not to mention free calls between certain
numbers...) but I dont want to pay for a data planso I figure if I
wanted to, I could just have my phone call my computer and transfer data
over the line.
There has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| On ti, 2008-04-08 at 10:22 -0400, Dan Staley wrote:
| I have plenty of cell minutes (not to mention free calls between certain
| numbers...) but I dont want to pay for a data planso I figure if I
|
On ti, 2008-04-08 at 16:02 +0100, Andy Green wrote:
I think you're right, but just a thought if you could issue ready-coded
GSM codec frames, you can put the data direct in there for 1KBytes/sec
Yeah, but you can't.
--
Mikko Rauhala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Helsinki
Hi Steven,
It is my understanding that this is the intention, but I haven't yet
received positive confirmation. I'll try to get an answer soon.
Michael
Steven Kurylo wrote:
PVT testing is in process, and I'll ask Steve to send an update within the
next few days.
A little while ago when I
Mikko Rauhala wrote:
On ti, 2008-04-08 at 10:22 -0400, Dan Staley wrote:
I have plenty of cell minutes (not to mention free calls between certain
numbers...) but I dont want to pay for a data planso I figure if I
wanted to, I could just have my phone call my computer and transfer data
over
Tilman Baumann wrote:
Maybe CSD is billed like a voice call. I never used it, but i don't
remember any special charges for that.
I dug deeper. Seems like this is true.
But this raises the question if the Neo can do CSD. Probably it does,
since the GSM module does not appear to be somehow
On ti, 2008-04-08 at 17:16 +0200, Tilman Baumann wrote:
Maybe CSD is billed like a voice call. I never used it, but i don't
remember any special charges for that.
Doubtful for the US drop your pants and bend over, please carriers'
minutes; I presume the original poster was in this situation
All
850 and 900 Mhz versions are being produced at the same time.
-Sean
Michael Shiloh wrote:
Hi Steven,
It is my understanding that this is the intention, but I haven't yet
received positive confirmation. I'll try to get an answer soon.
Michael
Steven Kurylo wrote:
PVT testing is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| On ti, 2008-04-08 at 16:02 +0100, Andy Green wrote:
| I think you're right, but just a thought if you could issue ready-coded
| GSM codec frames, you can put the data direct in there for 1KBytes/sec
|
|
Mikko Rauhala wrote:
A quick glance finds mostly mentions of 1st gen analog mobiles having
been used with modems, and notably At the same time, the speech
oriented audio compression used in GSM actually meant that data rates
using a traditional modem connected to the phone would have been even
On 4/7/08, steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I explained a while back we had a few milestones to hit before
beginning
mass production.
The First was DVT. Building phones and verifying the design. That's been
completed and so we have
Moved onto the next stage PVT. Verifying the design for
On 4/7/08, Didier Raboud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* If I loose or let my Moko being stolen, I can find my connection
parameters (on the paper) and go to track.openmoko.com and there I can
find
24 coordinates a day. This could help me find it back or help the police
find it back. Of course,
In the time since Openmoko originally announced it's phone without 3G
support and now, as the Freerunner is approaching release, it has
become more of an issue that it does not have 3G (how much of an issue
we can debate, certainly).
So please, *please* bear in mind that when talking about the
I will stick to links and go via my proxy server, to remove the spam:)
But I know people have different needs. I think we should not say one option
is the only correct one. I would love to see both links and more advanced
browsers being supported over time.
--
Please don't send me Word or
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Brad Midgley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys
It shouldn't be treated like an either-or for wifi and 3g. The phone
should have both. [...]
Everyone.
I have to agree with Brad here. Wifi has other uses too!
I'm sure I'm not the only one who wants/needs the
On Tue, April 8, 2008 18:02, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Andy Green writes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| On ti, 2008-04-08 at 16:02 +0100, Andy Green wrote:
| I think you're right, but just a thought if you could issue
ready-coded
| GSM
Diego Fdez. Durán writes:
On Tue, April 8, 2008 18:02, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Andy Green writes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| On ti, 2008-04-08 at 16:02 +0100, Andy Green wrote:
| I think you're right, but just a thought if you could
On 4/8/08, Antoine Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Brad Midgley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys
It shouldn't be treated like an either-or for wifi and 3g. The phone
should have both. [...]
Everyone.
I have to agree with Brad here. Wifi has other uses
Flemming Richter Mikkelsen said:
I will stick to links and go via my proxy server, to remove the spam:)
But I know people have different needs. I think we should not say one
option is the only correct one. I would love to see both links and
more advanced browsers being supported over time.
Am Di 8. April 2008 schrieb Tilman Baumann:
Tilman Baumann wrote:
Maybe CSD is billed like a voice call. I never used it, but i don't
remember any special charges for that.
I dug deeper. Seems like this is true.
But this raises the question if the Neo can do CSD. Probably it does,
Just my 2C.
I have been following this thread for some time. I think the idea is
GREAT...Knowing I have phones somewhere, 2 in the US, 1 in Germany and I
think one in the UK.
What if we start it out simple? Each device owner can choose to
register their MAC, modem serial number or other
On 4/8/08, christooss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Flemming Richter Mikkelsen said:
I will stick to links and go via my proxy server, to remove the spam:)
But I know people have different needs. I think we should not say one
option is the only correct one. I would love to see both links and
Also, remember to set:
# TAG: redirect_program
redirect_program /usr/bin/squidGuard
and to filter flash (I forgot), you can create a rule like this:
acl annoying3 url_regex \.flv \.swf
and use the rule:
http_access deny annoying3
--
Please don't send me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See
The FreeRunner uses a 500 Mhz CPU. The board design is rated to 400 Mhz.
So, if people check CPU processing specs they will see 500MHz.
Operationally, we limit it to 400 Mhz. For a varety of reasons.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Diego Fdez. Durán writes:
| On Tue, April 8, 2008 18:02, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
| Andy Green writes:
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| | On ti,
I have downloaded SolidWorks package from the page. The problem I see is
all files have .1 on the end of a name. Example
gtc02-msh01.prt.1
Is this my problem or packaging problem?
Tnx for anwser
___
Openmoko community mailing list
I whip out my A780 and browse the net/read e-mail/update remote todo
lists/ssh into my home network nearly everywhere I go. I use my phone's
EDGE capabilities while riding across Texas to the next family event. I use
it to check my personal e-mail during downtimes at work (restrictions
against
I've just done a clean install of Ubuntu 7.10 and am trying to follow the
instructions from the Toolchain wiki page. When I try the command:
sudo apt-get install gcc g++ autoconf automake binutils libtools ...
I get this error message:
*Package autoconf is not available, but is referred to by
i'm not on an ubuntu box now, but try automake1.9 instead of automake,
i think that's the newest version
2008/4/9 Dale Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've just done a clean install of Ubuntu 7.10 and am trying to follow the
instructions from the Toolchain wiki page. When I try the command:
apt-cache search autoconf will show possible packages that contain the
string autoconf.
apt-cache show packagename will give you a description of the package.
Stefanie
Robin Paulson wrote:
i'm not on an ubuntu box now, but try automake1.9 instead of automake,
i think that's the newest
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:21 PM, christooss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have downloaded SolidWorks package from the page. The problem I see is all
files have .1 on the end of a name. Example
gtc02-msh01.prt.1
Is this my problem or packaging problem?
Tnx for anwser
As the file name
Hi,
have you changed your repositories and reload the paket list? you might
remove the cdrom and add at least the main repository in
settings-Repositiories and click on the upper left reload button. if
you have still problems ask in your local IRC channel on
irc.freenode.net.
regards,
frederik
41 matches
Mail list logo
