I have one (or something equivalent) in my watch (Casio Pathfinder Wave
Ceptor). It synchronizes the time of my watch every night at midnight.
/shrug
--Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of cdr
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 11:26 AM
To:
-Original Message-
From: Robin Paulson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 6:29 PM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion community@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: Re: .Mac like service
/snip
alternatively, an application to sit
on my pc and do all this stuff
locally would
-Original Message-
From: David Pottage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:15 AM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion community@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: Re: Loosing your moko
On Wed, April 9, 2008 2:39 pm, Sebastian Billaudelle wrote:
Yes, i think a normal
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 8:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I'm concerned, this should have ended last week. The original
question asked was why continue with OpenMoko development when Qtopia
is available, faster, more complete and stable?. It was debated and
some pretty conclusive reasons
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 9:36, Lars Hallberg wrote:
Josef Wolf skrev:
[ I warm-up this old thread again... ]
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:02:31AM +0200, Lars Hallberg wrote:
a mock-up on a 90-key by one stroke finger keyboard. Think this might
be an usable and pretty efficient input method.
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 11:35, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
On 20:15:37 2007-08-26 Edwin Lock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So you have to get used to it every time again? doesn't seem like a
very
good idea.
My experience is that people like to get used to things and do them
like the got used
I just noticed this:
http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS5539544742.html
They claim to have many of the features we have talked about on the list...
however, I am wondering about the pending patent related to placing
security in the bootloader for signature checking of a boot image. Does
anyone
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:32, Giles Jones wrote:
Anything and everything is possible.
Obviously, you mean this withing the realm of programming openmoko.
Otherwise, its a very broad and bold statement. /grin
--Tim
___
OpenMoko community mailing
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:06, Mark Eichin wrote:
Ok, now I feel stupid. Guess you get to call me a muppet after all :-}
The batteries and cards were all wrapped together in one of the foam
cutouts. I don't know how I missed it this morning, when I got home I
went through every compartment to
Err... That was supposed to br linux phone platform...
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 8:35, Tim Newsom wrote:
I just noticed this:
http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS5539544742.html
They claim to have many of the features we have talked about on the
list... however, I am wondering about the pending
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:27, coomac wrote:
Rather than alienate one group over the other, why not have something
for both? A non camera version for those who don't need the feature as
well as a camera version with the exact same specs for those who can't
live without it? I mean, why have a
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:27, Jeff Andros wrote:
On 7/18/07, Tim Newsom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
You could expand this a little and possibly select items from multiple
location lists and then select
Find the shortest route to complete all tasks
snip
--Tim
just don't expect it to do so
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:02, Jeff Andros wrote:
I haven't used a mac other than casually (checking email) since os9...
so I'm not so up on growl. I'd like basically arbitrary code
execution, but with some (read LOTS) of protection on how that gets
registered (can't let Sean's dad install
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:28, Daniel Bartholomew wrote:
Well, since Apple has gone iThis and iThat with everything and dropped
their use of PowerThis and PowerThat, why not co-opt that?
How would you like a PowerPhone?
--
Daniel Bartholomew
Well, in a similar vein (throwing in my own silly
OK.. Great minds think alike... Or maybe not. /grin
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:11, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
How about simply the youPhone, or uPhone?
On 7/16/07, Ian Darwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I completely agree. My idea is to make two advertisment campains:
one on
maisntream media: maybe
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 9:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or hack a USB socket onto one of the many discarded 5V chargers you
have lying
around. If your house is like mine, they seem to show up out of
nowhere.
Michael
So that's what happens to all of the 5v chargers I place in the drying
Um... Japan does have GSM service... I am positive as I recently had
guests in my house from japan.
They brought their cell phones and I showed them how to make them work
in the US.
As far as I know... Granted, making them work in the us meant dropping
the 3g and switching to GSM service...
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 12:25, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
Another good reason from an open-source product. Maybe there is a
vast untapped market for selling open-source phones to the governments
of the world (to protect them from the other governments of the
word. ;-))
-wolfgang
Except that as
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 4:01, Robin Paulson wrote:
excuse my ignorance, but do you mean a 3d scanner as in a device for
measuring a 3d object?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_scanner
if you do, and have a Neo, that would be awesome. any chance of using
it to produce an electronic model of the
I have been thinking a little more about this and I struck upon an
idea... What if you could buy a custom case with a custom message on
it.
I am not talking about painted messages but letters and shapes cast into
the plastic shell.
Raised, sunk, custom fonts etc.
Naturally we can't just
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 8:59, no_use wrote:
these are exactly the reactions i got from my friends.. specially as
the
mainbord seems rectangular, i wouldn't like to see it with this rounded
top and bottom..
..and all i want is 3G.. :(
So add case design ideas to the wiki where previously noted.
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 9:50, Michael Sersen wrote:
About custom case design for the Neo and beyond; I am very interested
in this idea. I have a cnc router at my disposal and can make custom
parts from materials such as Corian and exotic hardwoods and some soft
metals. I'd love to see some spec's,
There are several types of clear plastic which could be used to fulfill
this idea.. Both as plastic injection and liquid casting material.
--Tim
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 9:50, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
Hi,
On 7/3/07, Ben Burdette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Case modding for phones, cool.
Maybe we
That's not necessarily true.. Look at plastic bottles.
Clear soda bottles are fairly strong and not nearly as brittle as some
other clear plastics. Plus, that plastic is useful as injection
material.
Plus, if it were cheap enough to get new cases, most people would not
care if they dropped
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:24, Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
Dear Community,
Michael Shiloh has volunteered to setup a booth at Ubuntu Live
(http://www.ubuntulive.com) July 22 to 24 in Portland, Oregon. He'll be
demoing and talking about both the platform and the Neo. If you're in
town, please stop by!
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:56, Matthew S. Hamrick wrote:
Also.. to follow up on what Adrian recently said.. The tech shop also
has a CNC milling machine. I'm no expert, but I believe that the idea
is that you put a CAD file in one side and take out a completed part
out the other. So... if you
Note...
I did ask about permission and we were told to wait on discussing with
official personel till phase 2 of the phone. So scanning the actual
case and building a knockoff would (in my opinion and until I am
corrected by FIC / Sean or other person with some authority) be a
violation of
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:39, Robin Paulson wrote:
I have added a sub-section to the Neo1973 hardware section of the
wiki, concerning alternate cases. there are a few ideas as starters,
including one with a d-pad and a steampunk design. Anyone with any
other ideas/more info to flesh out what i've
Sean,
Supposing some company decided to provide alternate case designs or add
on products for the neo1973, who do they need to talk to about branding
/ authorization to sell them to the public?
OR
Is it possible that FIC or the OpenMoko company will have a section on
their sales page
There's also the possibility of adding some kind of attachment to a
specially designed battery or backpack which could add this ability by
interfacing with the I2C or SPI ports available.
--Tim
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:43, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Kenshin writes:
I think there is a huge benefict
Hehe, I know that.. I was mentioning it for the benefit of the previous
person who was asking about joysticks.
--Tim
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:22, Steven ** wrote:
Someone has already mentioned on this list about using the Wii
Nunchuck. Apparently it will connect to the I2C fairly easily.
.. Does that make any sense?
--Tim
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 5:49, Vladimir Giszpenc wrote:
On 6/27/07, Tim Newsom wrote:
This could provide the xaml parser for use in an interface design some
of us have spoken about.
Separating the interface from the actual code that processes the
events... Or that's
This could provide the xaml parser for use in an interface design some
of us have spoken about.
Separating the interface from the actual code that processes the
events... Or that's how I understand it.
Its a truely awesome development.
--Tim
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:58, Vladimir Giszpenc wrote:
OR... They could have it being developed on an internal developer
machine and not go live till they are ready.
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Guess the OpenMoko Web Store URL!
Sooner or later, they have to start selling. But from where?
webstore.openmoko.org??
Oh... And the neo1973 will probably be sold at some FIC site ... I
mean... OpenMoko is not just for the neo1973 and they are only related
because OpenMoko can run on the neo1973.
Indeed, suns new java phone os and probably windows mobile will also run
on the device.
Plus, since its an FIC
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 4:52, Buddy wrote:
On 6/13/07, Emre Turkay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/12/07, Tim Newsom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is where XAML or XUL are particularly suited.
The idea is that the UI will be mostly svg commands or in some cases
images.. But rendered completely
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 7:08, Emre Turkay wrote:
On 6/13/07, Peter A Trotter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the application is then used on a different form factor device you
can
simply produce a new SVG file. All the UI script and images are linked
to
the SVG.
This also gives us a nice separation
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:15, John Seghers wrote:
Tim Newsom wrote
As I understand it, you would not even need to build a different svg
file. You could use the same one and it could automatically scale
because the engine would scale it.. It should be possible (in my
mind)
to take a layout
This is where XAML or XUL are particularly suited.
The idea is that the UI will be mostly svg commands or in some cases
images.. But rendered completely by the engine. Look up what you get
for using it and you will see what I am talking about. There is work to
be done getting XAML to
From what I read, the LIPS group is creating an 'open' standard. The
impression I got from that was the other phone standards group was
'closed' whatever that means.
If we are going to back a group, maybe FIC should join it and help in
the development process of the standard. None of the
. Separating the
interface allows us to experiment with a number of different
interface technologies. And the only thing the experimenters need to
know is the semantics and syntax of the XML interface.
-Cheers!
-Matt H.
On Jun 11, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Tim Newsom wrote:
If we are heading in the direction
Has anyone else seen the samsung F700?
Its features are pretty nice... No idea on the OS but I would definitly
take one over an IPhone... If it performs anything like it looks...
Hehe.
Its got very good specs.
--Tim
___
OpenMoko community mailing
and no bluetooth.
And the screen is even smaller and lower resolution than the iPhone.
-Steven
On 6/7/07, Tim Newsom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone else seen the samsung F700?
Its features are pretty nice... No idea on the OS but I would definitly
take one over an IPhone... If it performs anything
and the FIC Neo1973 will be successful and FIC
produces more open phones in future.
2007/6/7, Tim Newsom [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Hmm... I thought it listed wifi and bluetooth on samsungs website...
--Tim
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 8:57, Mark McClellan wrote:
nice. very nice.
i really hope this is close
So apparently Jobs decided to allow 3rd party software on the phone
after all... Interesting development.
--Tim
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
AhI see. /shrug.
--Tim
On 6/5/07, David Schlesinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure Jobs and company are not blind to
the strength of open source software and the
boon it would provide if they made a freely
available dev kit for the phone.
As someone who worked at Apple for ten years,
If your tracking movement with 2 3D accelerometers... What would another
one provide.
As far as I can tell (I am not an expert...)
Tracking all 6 vectors will tell you absolute movement in space. I.e,
when 2 vectors point in the same direction with the same magnitude at
approximately the same
the Sidekick3 dimensions...
http://www.sizeasy.com/page/comp/1842
-Pete
On 16/05/07, Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
I've just done a fast sizeasy comparison:
http://www.sizeasy.com/page/comp/1840
And, yes, the Neo1973 is big!
2007/5/16, Tim Newsom [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 15 May 2007 18:16, Ian Stirling wrote:
FIC is not a small company. http://www.fic.com.tw/about.htm Over 5000
employees isn't small.
Smaller than Nokia/Sony, sure. But they are well over 20 times the size
of Trolltech, who launched the greenphone.
Ahh.. But who manufactured the
No problem.. It was more of a rhetorical(sp?) question anyway. I was
just trying to point out that the situation was a bit different.
--Tim
On Tue, 15 May 2007 18:41, Robin Paulson wrote:
ahh, damn gmail shitesorry tim
from trolltech.com
Q. Did Trolltech design the phone? Are there
On Tue, 15 May 2007 22:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Tigran Zakoyan wrote:
Jason Elwell wrote:
I dont know whats more sad... You creating a paperdoll of an
OpenMoko, or
the fact that I downloaded it and made one for myself! LOL!
Me too :) BTW, can't agree 1973 is
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 3:54, Alexander E Genaud wrote:
Tim,
I believe Microsoft created the non-standard XMLHttpRequest object
through Active X around IE 5 but it has become something of a standard
implemented by Firefox, Safari/Konquerer, Opera, and perhaps others.
I've been using a nice
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:58, Matthew S. Hamrick wrote:
Okay.. a few points:
snip
Q. javascript? on a phone? Isn't that going to suck down the power?
A. in a word, yes. But I think the main problem will not be the added
overhead of using javascript, it's going to be the frequent request /
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 8:35, Andreas Kostyrka wrote:
You cannot block them. But you can make the phone completly ignore it.
OTOH, that's not the same thing because combined with a delivery
report, somebody else can see when you turn your phone on :(
Andreas
Is it possible to turn delivery
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 9:41, Martin Raißle wrote:
Is it possible to turn delivery reports off?
--Tim
I think it's not .. at least not for the receiver of a message ...
martin
That seems weird... Even in email you can turn off read receipts... It
seems like an invasion of sort (though a minor
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 11:22, Jonathon Suggs wrote:
Ok, I'll be honest that I have no proof that this is how it actually
works, but I don't think it works the way you are saying it does.
Again, not 100% positive, but the receipt that you receive is only a
message that it has been successfully
On a related note to all of this sms talk... Can you send an sms with
delivery receipt to a range of addresses and get back notification for
all phone numbers which actually exist? (Obviously it will be one at a
time, not boradcast)
Or does it just return success once it changed network
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:17, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Thoughts?
From what I remember of the discussions so far, that seems to meet the
majority of requirements for encrypted file storage and also manages
many of the things related to authentication that we have been
discussing. Now, if we can
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:13, Tim Newsom wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:17, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Thoughts?
From what I remember of the discussions so far, that seems to meet the
majority of requirements for encrypted file storage and also manages
many of the things related to authentication
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 1:33, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote:
I don't really see why one would want to use Truecrypt when there's
been LUKS
in the Linux kernel for years now...
Well, for one I had never heard of LUKS till earlier yesterday. Now I
will have to go check it out. (Grin)
--Tim
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 9:34, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Tobias Gruetzmacher writes:
Right -- these look like good approaches, but to a different problem.
/please excuse my direct manner.. Its just how I write (smile)
What do you mean by different problem? Maybe I don't fully understand.
The way I
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:03, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Hope my notes above are helpful...
Hehe that's great. At least I am certain that you and I are on the same
page now. I thought from my very quick glance at truecrypt that it
could encrypt individual files also but I have not had a hard look
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:35, Jonathon Suggs wrote:
My challenge is just to think bigger. Think how this could be
incorporated to work with *any* phone. Then you can have a much larger
group of people to brainstorm, test, and bugfix. We have enough
protocols and standards to support.
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:35, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
But it has the encryption jail drawback.
So maybe one way to deal with these issues is to build out the framework
by constructing a new api for reading and writing data based on this
provider concept.. Including the authentication. Then deal
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:59, Henryk Plötz wrote:
Moin,
Plus: If you really want per-file encryption that would only need some
minimal modifications to the existing solutions. Or use unionfs.
That's very interesting and opens up lots of potential.
Your right, key management along with many
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 2:08, Jim McDonald wrote:
Tim Newsom wrote:
The best part is that if you don't want it, you don't use it. And
those that do want it, can use it and its all completley transparent
to the applications.
But not at all transparent to the end user. Again assuming
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 8:12, Jim McDonald wrote:
Tim Newsom wrote:
[Encryption options]
Yep I understand that there are lots of possibilities and options, I
just think that if something ships by default it should provide end
users with a very simple dialog that is basically an on/off switch
After reading about truecrypt on slashdot I think that could pose as a
suitable start to the encryption solution... At least as a starting
place to build a framework on and test out some ideas.
--Tim
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:25, Jim McDonald wrote:
Clare Johnstone wrote:
On 3/20/07, Jim McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
continually asking the user to decide which data is to be encrypted and
which not.
There is the concept of folders which could be used :)
clare
True, but that's just
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:09, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
I like this -- except it doesn't quite match my sample-of-one user
study. My degree-of-security-wanted is by data, not by application.
The same app is used for things like VINs and tire sizes and oil
filters for cars (no security) and for student
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:05, Henryk Plötz wrote:
Moin,
/snip
Some feedback will be necessary so the user can see that the gesture
was correctly detected before sending the PIN to the SIM. I propose
some
sort of bubblebabble-digest.
--
Henryk Plötz
Grüße aus Berlin
~ Help Microsoft fight
Sorry, got caught in the reply to issue.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Newsom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Possible security hole for Dialers/troyan horses
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 7:02:58 -0800
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 0:05, Evgeny wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 07:35
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 6:09, Evgeny wrote:
It still Linux based phone — there is absolutely no real-life viruses
for Linux at this time, trojans are possible treat, but user have to
install them by himself.
That's a pretty strong statement.. Are you absolutely sure there are no
viruses for
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:42, Tomasz Zielinski wrote:
2007/3/1, mathew davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
then give it a rating of some sort 1 - being safe/trusted program and
10 -
being known bad binary/ don't use at any cost unless you really want
bad
things to happen.
Well, nobody will recognize
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:35, ryan lerch wrote:
hi all,
just a friendly reminder that we are getting a lot of people
subscribing to and posting to this community list that may not know
all the mailing list etiquette that you do.
So please be nice to these new-comers, and be patient with them;
*
on the phone?
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 9:29, Mikko J Rauhala wrote:
On pe, 2007-02-02 at 09:06 -0800, Tim Newsom wrote:
If we have access to the mic and speakers while a call is in process,
and we have the ability to record conversations etc... Where does the
processor sit in that chain? Can we consume
While the phone is not on a call, can we use the gsm audio codec or
other hardware/software to do useful work? For instance, decoding of
some audio file or something like that.
I know we don't have access to the bare metal of the chip, but its
probably at least an arm processor with some dsp
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:12, Jeff Andros wrote:
as I understand it, you can get more value out of the accellerometer
than that
in the simplest case, we know a gps can be off by a certain percent.
say you leave the phone still for a long time, you could average the
error and get more precise
You're speaking of OBD or CAN.
There are some good interfaces out there, though the auto companies
try to protect their information. It would be neat to build a
plotter/scanner interface for measuring the car sensors on the Neo
using either bluetooth or serial/usb.
Bluetooth OBD scanner:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 9:12, Steven Milburn wrote:
yes, accelerometers measure acceleration. The first derivative of
acceleration is velocity. Granted errors in the accelerometer compound
when deriving velocity, but you've usually got GPS information to
calibrate against (As Jeff was saying).
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:18, Steven Milburn wrote:
Wow, I can't believe I got that backwards, thanks for the correction.
Kind of embarrassing considering I actually work on this stuff.
However, it doesn't invalidate that you don't need any more information
than the accelerometer and a
For GeoPointing to work right, you would also need an electronic compass
module in the phone Right? Cause accelerometers don't know which
direction your pointing and gps isn't probably accurate enough to derive
what you pointed at when you moved it maybe 2 or 3 feet during the
gesture.
could vibrate a little when
it found the answer. Then you can look at the face to see what it was.
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 9:27, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote:
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 17:04, Tim Newsom wrote:
For GeoPointing to work right, you would also need an electronic
compass
module
Bah, forgot to reply all.
I think that's an excellent idea actually... A website where you can log
into, set up preferences about the packages you have installed and build
an image based on that.
Is that ability already in existence? I mean, I am sure ipkg has the
ability to update all of
There is going to be bluetooth on the phone. The range is small, but
the possibility of a bluetooth to wifi adaptor might be interesting...
Maybe something small enough to clip on a belt. Then connect to it
through bluetooth and have it connect to wifi and redirect network
traffic.
I am
ROM isn't required, and the CPLD can function
immediately on system start-up.
/Ole
On 12/7/06, Tim Newsom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok... So how many times can you reprogram it before it wears out?
Like flash has a max number of times it can be written and eprom and
eeproms did... What's
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 7:59, Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
On 12/1/06 11:28 PM, Gabriel Ambuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not just copy the sim card into the phone? We use Linux, so we
can do
whatever we like
I'm not sure, but doesn't the GSM module want to talk to the SIM card
directly?
the problem with doing it this way, is you'd need some way to notify
each application of all the sensors available at runtime, or you
re-compile each availability sensitive app for every combination of
sensors (having that many versions of software is sure to turn off
Sean's dad) there's
I love this idea and I would like to suggest a method of handeling a
portions of it...
Use web services... Web methods or whatever you call it. If you build
an api for uploading sets of data they could be implelented in almost
any lauguage and used natively like normal objects.
Perl, php,
Yeah. But more specifically I am defining the type of api as web
services or web methods (they are the same thing usually).
Basically, the web method is a standard used to define the remote method
calls, their required parameters and types of acceptable data from
within a program. Any
Right.. For peer to peer or requests directly to the phone that's true.
There is no reason we could not build a community shared server to be
the intermedary between the phones however...
Something that doesn't store the data longer than necessary for another
phone to retreive the
Web services are XML data transfer. The problem with xml is that it is
wordy for data (size) but good for parsing. What I mean by that is that its
not the most efficient way to transfer data ( ok thats obvious) but its a
defined format and easy to parse just about anywhere.. just slow.
If you
So here is a document talking about some of the things we have mentioned...
From the link to nokia...
http://research.nokia.com/tr/NRC-TR-2006-005.pdf
Interesting, they have thought of quite a bit of this already.
--Tim.
On 11/29/06, Jeff Andros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/29/06, Tim
Related to this, was my question about themes.
I will have to check out the abilities of the gtk theme engine in
regards to this, but I have an interest in porting the LCARS theme from
the 770 or other themes to the phone.
It would seem to me (and maybe I don't understand as well as I thought
94 matches
Mail list logo
