On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Radek Polak wrote:
did you built it yourself or are you using binary from somewhere?
I think he's using the latest (as I write) snapbuild from here:
http://trac.karadog.net/qt-extended-improved/wiki/SnapBuilds
--
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ :
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Chris Samuel ch...@csamuel.org wrote:
On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Radek Polak wrote:
did you built it yourself or are you using binary from somewhere?
I think he's using the latest (as I write) snapbuild from here:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Franky Van Liedekerke
liede...@telenet.be wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Chris Samuel ch...@csamuel.org wrote:
On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Radek Polak wrote:
did you built it yourself or are you using binary from somewhere?
I think he's using the
Seems that this hasn't yet been 100% solved. I'm using QT Extended
Improved 20090316 and my friend reported hearing bad echo when he
called me today. I'm pretty sure that it was the first call since
boot, so it's likely that none of the places in the code that the echo
suppression is activated had
Seems that this hasn't yet been 100% solved. I'm using QT Extended
Improved 20090316 and my friend reported hearing bad echo when he
called me today. I'm pretty sure that it was the first call since
boot, so it's likely that none of the places in the code that the echo
suppression is
Am Do 12. März 2009 schrieb Al Johnson:
I can see the patch setting %N0187 when making a call, waking, initialising
etc. but not when answering a call. It seems like it needs adding there too
to
fix this for some people. AFAIK we never did find out why the echo/nr
settings
are persistent
I can see the patch setting %N0187 when making a call, waking, initialising
etc. but not when answering a call. It seems like it needs adding there too to
fix this for some people. AFAIK we never did find out why the echo/nr settings
are persistent for some people and not for others.
On
On Wednesday 11 March 2009, HouYu Li wrote:
Just had a test, when someone call my freerunner, he or she still can hear
the echo. but when calling someone from my freerunner, no echo.
That's weird, as on QtE 4.4.2 I've had no reports of that when people are
calling me.
I couldn't figure out
On Thursday 12 March 2009, Al Johnson wrote:
I can see the patch setting %N0187 when making a call, waking, initialising
etc. but not when answering a call.
Yup, I agree, I just can't find anything in the OpenMoko library that gets
called at that point where I can insert it!
--
Chris
On Thursday 12 March 2009, Chris Samuel wrote:
I couldn't figure out where to insert that AT command when a call was
received
I've just sent a patch to the list that inserts those AT commands when we
process a CNAP message from the network, which is hopefully an incoming call.
Completely
On Tuesday 10 March 2009, HouYu Li wrote:
The binary with your echo suppression patch is now available at
http://dashi-x02.karadog.net/~lihouyu/qtextended/snapbuild/. build
20090310.
Wow, that's fast work! Thanks!
Have you tried the 4.4.3 version out yet ?
--
Chris Samuel :
HouYu Li,
was the FR suspended when you received the call (i.e. did the call wake
your FR), or was it on ?
Filip.
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:08:58 +0100, HouYu Li kara...@gmail.com wrote:
Just had a test, when someone call my freerunner, he or she still can
hear
the echo. but when calling
this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/-PATCH--Added-echo-suppression-fixes-for-the-OpenMoko-Neo-phone.-tp2448716p2455741.html
Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community
The original Qt Extended 4.4.3 initially set both echo
suppression and noise reduction in separate AT commands
which might result in the second command negating the
first one. It also only set them for outgoing calls.
This new version uses the AT command to set both
echo suppression and noise
OK. I have committed your patch to my main repository. Now building
binaries.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Chris Samuel ch...@csamuel.org wrote:
The original Qt Extended 4.4.3 initially set both echo
suppression and noise reduction in separate AT commands
which might result in the second
The binary with your echo suppression patch is now available at
http://dashi-x02.karadog.net/~lihouyu/qtextended/snapbuild/. build 20090310.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:31 PM, HouYu Li kara...@gmail.com wrote:
OK. I have committed your patch to my main repository. Now building
binaries.
On
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 4:11:15 pm Chris Samuel wrote:
So I went back to the drawing board and changed it to use the AT%N0187
command to enable both noise reduction and echo suppression in one hit
I've posted the patch *and* the compiled version of the resulting
libneovendor.so library on my blog
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:37:41 +1100
Chris Samuel ch...@csamuel.org wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 4:11:15 pm Chris Samuel wrote:
So I went back to the drawing board and changed it to use the
AT%N0187 command to enable both noise reduction and echo
suppression in one hit
I've posted the patch
Hi all,
My previous patch for echo suppression was completely bogus, once I'd figured
out I could get the logging program to record all AT commands to the modem it
was obvious that it wasn't sending the intended command asides from when an
outgoing call occured (which is what the original QtE
19 matches
Mail list logo
