On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 17:19:18 +0200
joerg Reisenweber jo...@openmoko.org wrote:
In the last 50 years I've seen only _one_ truly modular concept for
electronic circuits that would basically meet the flexibility
requirements you are asking for:
On Sat, 05 Oct 2013 17:24:51 +0200
Raphael Wimmer raphael.wim...@ifi.lmu.de wrote:
* The concept assumes that all components use a common communication
backplane. This is not feasible, as a variety of voltages and
communication protocols are in use in a typical phone (I2C, SPI,
UART, USB,
On Sat, 05 Oct 2013 15:00:07 -0400
Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
And it would be bulkier and more expensive than a non-modular phone,
of course.
http://components.arrow.com/part/search/buglabs
The main cost in doing that is the plastic of the modules.
Denis.
Someone was talking about a modular phone, right?
Have a look at this (spoiler: it's not a phone ;) yet)
http://www.redsharknews.com/technology/item/1123-this-could-be-the-biggest-advance-in-camera-design-for-a-decade
Regards,
d
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Kai Lüke
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Pascal Gosselin pas...@aeroteknic.com wrote:
If technically feasible
That's the problem.
--
Sebastian Krzyszkowiak, dos
http://dosowisko.net/
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
On 2013-10-05 11:06 AM, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Pascal Gosselin pas...@aeroteknic.com wrote:
If technically feasible
That's the problem.
What immediately jumps to my mind is the small number of pins for the
modules, forcing everything to be based on
On 10/05/2013 04:04 PM, Pascal Gosselin wrote:
While I understand the needs/wants of open hardware, the average
smartphone user really couldn't care less. That's the core of the
problem, lack of a large user base.
HOWEVER, what a *lot* people seem to be interested in, is an open
In the last 50 years I've seen only _one_ truly modular concept for electronic
circuits that would basically meet the flexibility requirements you are asking
for:
http://makezine.com/2011/12/08/the-braun-lectron-system-retro-circuit-
dominoes/
/j
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html
Am 05.10.2013 um 17:06 schrieb Sebastian Krzyszkowiak:
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Pascal Gosselin pas...@aeroteknic.com wrote:
If technically feasible
That's the problem.
++
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
Am 05.10.2013 um 17:14 schrieb Pascal Gosselin:
On 2013-10-05 11:06 AM, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Pascal Gosselin pas...@aeroteknic.com
wrote:
If technically feasible
That's the problem.
What immediately jumps to my mind is the small number of pins
On Sat, 05 Oct 2013 17:04:24 +0200, Pascal Gosselin
pas...@aeroteknic.com wrote:
[...]
If technically feasible, this project I believe stands the best chance
of obtaining funding as the concept has wide appeal.
Interesting long-term vision: maybe.
Short-term replacement for GTA04: no.
I
Am 05.10.2013 um 17:19 schrieb joerg Reisenweber:
In the last 50 years I've seen only _one_ truly modular concept for
electronic
circuits that would basically meet the flexibility requirements you are
asking
for:
http://makezine.com/2011/12/08/the-braun-lectron-system-retro-circuit-
There are numerous threads on Reddit that explain very well why this is not
feasible [1,2,many]
This is bogus. It is feasible. Just not quite in the way those people
ask for it. E.g. you wouldn't have just a CPU module, and instead you'd
have a module that combines the CPU with many other
Hi,
GTAx is allready more extensible than normal smartphones because of usb
host mode. And any different fast data connector I think about might
allow an attacker to get access to your system, like the hacks with
firewire.
I also think it would be nice to have modular phone, but this is a huge
14 matches
Mail list logo
