Re: usb0 vs eth0

2009-06-02 Thread ivvmm
Angus Ainslie wrote: On June 1, 2009 08:54:51 am ivvmm wrote: Read the section for Slackware on that wiki page. This way that will do the right routing whatever the interface is called so you will not have to think how is it named at this time. As for me, I experience another problem: cannot

Re: usb0 vs eth0

2009-06-02 Thread Angus Ainslie
On June 2, 2009 08:37:21 am ivvmm wrote: I'm running Slackware and this obviously will not work. What am I supposed to do? P.S. sudo /sbin/ip l set eth0 down sudp /sbin/ip l set eth0 up will not help Never used slackware but something like below should work on most unix's ifconfig ethx

Re: usb0 vs eth0

2009-06-01 Thread Paul Fertser
Max m...@darim.com writes: When I plug FR it appears as eth0 instead of usb0. According to http://www.linux-usb.org/usbnet/ I have to set the local assignment bit, 0x02 in the first octet, to ensure it still uses a name like usb0 not eth0. It's on purpose and it's damn right. Search the

Re: usb0 vs eth0

2009-06-01 Thread roby
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Paul Fertser fercer...@gmail.com wrote: Max m...@darim.com writes: When I plug FR it appears as eth0 instead of usb0. It's on purpose and it's damn right. Search the archives. If you want some kind of interface renaming for whatever reason, write an

Re: usb0 vs eth0

2009-06-01 Thread Paul Fertser
roby hariseldo...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Paul Fertser fercer...@gmail.com wrote: Max m...@darim.com writes: When I plug FR it appears as eth0 instead of usb0. It's on purpose and it's damn right. Search the archives. If you want some kind of

Re: usb0 vs eth0

2009-06-01 Thread Ben Wong
i don't know which interface udev will assign to the neo.. for example when i connect it i get eth1, suddenly renamed to eth7 by udev, but am i sure it will always get eth7? I believe it depends on which distribution you run. Some distributions, like Debian, use a persistent-net-generator

Re: usb0 vs eth0

2009-06-01 Thread ivvmm
roby wrote: On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Paul Fertser fercer...@gmail.com mailto:fercer...@gmail.com wrote: Max m...@darim.com mailto:m...@darim.com writes: When I plug FR it appears as eth0 instead of usb0. It's on purpose and it's damn right. Search the archives. If you

Re: usb0 vs eth0

2009-06-01 Thread Angus Ainslie
On June 1, 2009 08:54:51 am ivvmm wrote: Read the section for Slackware on that wiki page. This way that will do the right routing whatever the interface is called so you will not have to think how is it named at this time. As for me, I experience another problem: cannot connect to the

Re: usb0 vs eth0

2009-06-01 Thread David Ford
The udev operation is simple. The net interface naming is normally based on the MAC address and is stored in /etc/udev/rules.d/{something} like 70-persistent-net.rules IF your distribution runs the persistence script. Otherwise device naming is based on the order in which devices are found

usb0 vs eth0

2009-05-31 Thread Max
Hello. When I plug FR it appears as eth0 instead of usb0. According to http://www.linux-usb.org/usbnet/ I have to set the local assignment bit, 0x02 in the first octet, to ensure it still uses a name like usb0 not eth0. Do you know what does it mean? I'd like FR to always appear as usb0 so it