On Thu 20 February 2014 12:05:00 Christoph Pulster wrote:
Hi,
@joerg: sorry we mis-communicate.
No we don't. Or at least I don't. ;-)
I am not talking about tracking
(location of caller),
me neither since that's absolutely trivial
but identification of caller.
me too
If I buy a
At Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:11:33 +0100,
joerg Reisenweber wrote:
On Thu 20 February 2014 12:05:00 Christoph Pulster wrote:
Hi,
@joerg: sorry we mis-communicate.
No we don't. Or at least I don't. ;-)
I am not talking about tracking
(location of caller),
me neither since that's
On Thu 20 February 2014 15:27:33 Neal H. Walfield wrote:
Why do you think the only use for a mobile phone is to make calls? If
I only make a data connection and am careful to tunnel all of my data
via Tor, then this identification method is useful.
Neal
Err, right. For that usecase it
Why do you think the only use for a mobile phone is to make calls? If
I only make a data connection and am careful to tunnel all of my data
via Tor, then this identification method is useful.
Maybe because we are talking about a GSM modem?
--
n...@el-hennig.de
Lubarsky's Law of Cybernetic
On Thu 20 February 2014 15:27:33 Neal H. Walfield wrote:
and am careful to tunnel all of my data
via Tor
Recent tests have revealed that at least 20 nodes in Tor are trying to break
into your encrypted data transmission.
It'd widely known that Tor is infiltrated by agencies.
/j
--
() ascii
joerg Reisenweber wrote:
On Thu 20 February 2014 15:27:33 Neal H. Walfield wrote:
and am careful to tunnel all of my data
via Tor
Err, right. For that usecase it might work - until you do
*anything* that gives away your ID
You still have location anonymity though. An adversary may
openm...@pulster.de (Christoph Pulster) wrote:
I remember adverts of Openmoko in capitals 100% FREE mobile.
that this was a false promise comes evident afterwards.
I wonder how many people forked over their $$$ for those expensive
Openmoko phones primarily in the hope that the bloody NDA would
On Thu 20 February 2014 20:38:35 Michael Spacefalcon wrote:
was a proprietary
phone no different from anything out of Motorola, Samsung or Apple.
evidently bullshit!
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
(alas the
Hi,
On 20 Feb 2014 12:05:00 +0100
openm...@pulster.de (Christoph Pulster) wrote:
I remember adverts of Openmoko in capitals 100% FREE mobile.
that this was a false promise comes evident afterwards.
the knowledge about NDA restrictions of GSM components is still today
only in some geek's
Of course it will never happen legally, but so what? We can build it
illegally instead.
You are a Pied Piper of Hamelin.
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
On Fri 21 February 2014 07:29:28 Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Of course it will never happen legally, but so what? We can build it
illegally instead.
You are a Pied Piper of Hamelin.
Let's hope we don't have to read Pied Piper Revisited or learn about some
landslide or somesuch, in a
On Fri 21 February 2014 07:48:02 joerg Reisenweber wrote:
On Fri 21 February 2014 07:29:28 Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Of course it will never happen legally, but so what? We can build it
illegally instead.
You are a Pied Piper of Hamelin.
Let's hope we don't have to read Pied
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller h...@goldelico.com wrote:
You are a Pied Piper of Hamelin.
I don't mind the role. Check out The Stolen Child, poem/song by
William Butler Yeats - I particularly like this rendition:
http://www.elvendrums.com/cddragon.php
VLR,
SF
On Thursday, February 20, 2014 08:38:35 PM Michael Spacefalcon wrote:
I am also convinced that the *real* reason why Openmoko = failure in
the general public's perception is precisely because of that NDA and
no one having broken it during the years when it mattered the most.
That's your point
Am 21.02.2014 um 08:26 schrieb Radek Polak:
On Thursday, February 20, 2014 08:38:35 PM Michael Spacefalcon wrote:
I am also convinced that the *real* reason why Openmoko = failure in
the general public's perception is precisely because of that NDA and
no one having broken it during the
15 matches
Mail list logo
