On Friday 25 May 2007 13:37, Sven Neuhaus wrote:
The software seems a lot worse than the hardware at the moment. Every
reaction to user input is slow. The GUI is quite pretty but the speed is
worrysome. What CPU is going to be in the upcoming faster version?
I would not be surprised to hear
On May 25, 2007, at 9:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 25 May 2007 13:37, Sven Neuhaus wrote:
The software seems a lot worse than the hardware at the moment.
Every
reaction to user input is slow. The GUI is quite pretty but the
speed is
worrysome. What CPU is going to be in the
Hello,
I've just done a fast sizeasy comparison:
http://www.sizeasy.com/page/comp/1840
And, yes, the Neo1973 is big!
2007/5/16, Tim Newsom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 22:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Tigran Zakoyan wrote:
Jason Elwell wrote:
I dont know
Nice Jose,
I added the Sidekick3 dimensions...
http://www.sizeasy.com/page/comp/1842
-Pete
On 16/05/07, Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've just done a fast sizeasy comparison:
http://www.sizeasy.com/page/comp/1840
And, yes, the Neo1973 is big!
2007/5/16,
Thanks, that helps quite a bit.
But if that's accurate, the neo is not that big. The sidekick 3 is
slightly smaller and thinner than a sidekick 2 (my current phone) and
the neo is considerably smaller than that...
Maybe its large to someone who uses a flip phone or set616 type phone.
To
Christopher Tokarczyk wrote:
not having a neo yet I can't comment on how it actually performs now,
but I just think it's worth pointing out that this is still very very
early. personally, i'm not too worried because i have faith that once
the phones are out and the community at large has a crack
Why do we keep saying it's still early? The phone was due in
March, and it's now not going to ship (if we're lucky) until June.
It's not early, it's late! Yes, the hardware has had issues, and
yes we want it right, but the software should have been ready to go
in March when it was
Jason Elwell wrote:
I dont know whats more sad... You creating a paperdoll of an OpenMoko, or the
fact that I downloaded it and made one for myself! LOL!
Me too :) BTW, can't agree 1973 is too big. It just fits the size of my QTEKs110, which size's been really handy for me two years
I use
Hello Community,
I am reading this mailing list about a month. And finally here is my first
post :)
Can any of happy neo1973 owners talk about its audio quality?
Comparing sound quality to iPod or SonyEricsson K750/W800/W810 with their
native headphones
(using known non-professional
Denis,
There are not many neo1973 owners yet. Only about 36 developers have received
a free phone. From what we hear, there is alot of work still to be be done
on the basic software. Hopefully in the the very near future, FIC will begin
selling to the rest of the development community so
2007/5/14, Ole Tange [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
= Software =
Software is very limited at this point: I have yet to place my first
call using the phone.
Features and overall software quality can (and will) improve in
future, but poor performance worries me much. Long time ago I had Palm
III which had
not having a neo yet I can't comment on how it actually performs now,
but I just think it's worth pointing out that this is still very very
early. personally, i'm not too worried because i have faith that once
the phones are out and the community at large has a crack at them,
things will improve.
On Tue, 15 May 2007 22:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Tigran Zakoyan wrote:
Jason Elwell wrote:
I dont know whats more sad... You creating a paperdoll of an
OpenMoko, or
the fact that I downloaded it and made one for myself! LOL!
Me too :) BTW, can't agree 1973 is
= Hardware =
== Size ==
The phone is BIG. There is no other word for it. It makes it even
worse when you open the phone and see that a lot of space is wasted:
Half of the thickness is taken by the battery, a very small vibrator,
2 small loud speakers and half of the 2 antennas - leaving 50% of
On 5/14/07, Ole Tange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
= Hardware =
I have been asked which phone versions this covers
Phone version: GTA01B_V3 and GTA01B_V4
Both are phase-0 phones.
/Ole
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
On 5/14/07, Ole Tange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So to me the following actions should be put on the left side:
left, undo, back, cancel, previous, no, reject-call
and these should be put on the right hand side:
right, apply, forward, OK, next, yes, answer-call, do-it
I just want to point
From all phones I saw being sold in Europe (and few years ago in Asia) only
Motorola (and not in all
models) use the reject-on-left and answer-on-right style. Maybe Im mistaken but
I always tought that
all others just do the oposite? Have no idea where did it come from,
considering that first
Piotr Duda napisał(a):
models) use the reject-on-left and answer-on-right style. Maybe Im mistaken but
I always tought that
all others just do the oposite? Have no idea where did it come from,
considering that first mobile
phones was made in Motorola as I believe, and others perhaps should
On 14/05/07, Piotr Duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From all phones I saw being sold in Europe (and few years ago in Asia)
only Motorola (and not in all
models) use the reject-on-left and answer-on-right style. Maybe Im
mistaken but I always tought that
all others just do the oposite? Have no idea
On ma, 2007-05-14 at 07:21 -0500, Steven ** wrote:
It also occurs to me that in an OK/Cancel dialog, OK is always on the
left. So again, consistency would suggest leaving it that way.
OpenMoko uses GTK, which per default uses the Mac-style OK on bottom
right approach, which I find to be better
Bartlomiej Zdanowski AutoGuard Ltd. wrote:
Piotr Duda napisał(a):
models) use the reject-on-left and answer-on-right style. Maybe Im mistaken
but I always tought that
all others just do the oposite? Have no idea where did it come from,
considering that first mobile
phones was made in
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 15:53 +0200, Bartlomiej Zdanowski AutoGuard Ltd.
wrote:
Piotr Duda napisał(a):
models) use the reject-on-left and answer-on-right style. Maybe Im mistaken
but I always tought that
all others just do the oposite? Have no idea where did it come from,
considering
I would be interested to know what you thought were strong suits of the
phone. Programs you liked, and other things that the phone does well. Just
curious I guess. I like hearing about the phone from people who have actual
models.
Thanks,
Matt
___
The same for me. Especially I'm interessted in the speed, the phone
functions (address book, dialer, history, ...) and the voice quality.
2007/5/14, mathew davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would be interested to know what you thought were strong suits of the
phone. Programs you liked, and other
I too would love to hear more about the phone, even if its an early
release. Take it outside for us, and tell us about the sunlight reading!
Send us a photo of it being 'big', maybe in comparison to another phone or a
soda can or mouse pad!
Does anyone know if there are plans for the final
On 5/14/07, mathew davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be interested to know what you thought were strong suits of the
phone. Programs you liked, and other things that the phone does well. Just
curious I guess. I like hearing about the phone from people who have actual
models.
It is a
I dont know whats more sad... You creating a paperdoll of an OpenMoko, or the
fact that I downloaded it and made one for myself! LOL!
Hopefully it will confort me till I get the real thing. :)
-Jason
On Monday 14 May 2007 15:40:31 Ole Tange wrote:
On 5/14/07, mathew davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
27 matches
Mail list logo
