Keep in mind that on virtualized environments not only load can vary, but also
the (virtual) CPU capacity.
So other VMs on the same host, having a huge load could cause high CPU loads
on your AntiSpam-VM. Not because your apps create it but because 100% is
relative (lower) then it was before.
I can confirm that the newer versions of Declude has brought some changes in
the Log-Levels.
They does contain heavily more information on the MID level, bumping up
logfiles without containing necessary data for MDLP reporting.
On LOW level the Subject and MFrom-lines are missing.
David
-Original Message-
From: community@mailsbestfriend.com [mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com] On
Behalf Of Markus Gufler | Limitis
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 2:46 AM
To: community@mailsbestfriend.com
Subject: [MBF]AW: Declude reporting
I can confirm that the newer versions of Declude
Hi
Around two months ago we installed a new server operating system and the latest
Declude release having the old log levels (we use them for diagnostics and user
based quarantine reports and management)
Declude 4.6.35 Diagnostics
Compilation Platform: IMail
JunkMail
Same thing observed here.
I've set up a geolocation database and have created some scripts parsing the
smtp logs for authenticated as lines.
More than x connections from different foreign countries are blocked
automatically.
Up to now the script changes the password with the drawback that
A little googling turned out this
http://blogs.boomerang.com/blog/2010/01/20/ms-outlook-words-to-avoid/
-Original Message-
From: community@mailsbestfriend.com [mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com] On
Behalf Of Michael Cummins
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 12:41 PM
To:
Hi
Thank you for this information.
How does it look like? ... because I can't see any problems here...
Markus
Von: community@mailsbestfriend.com [mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com] Im
Auftrag von Linda Pagillo
Gesendet: Freitag, 24. Oktober 2014 18:55
An: community@mailsbestfriend.com
This graph covers 4 weeks from 2014-10-15 up to now.
The y-values are hourly processed messages.
Green is a correct BRBL-result compared to the final weight.
Red is a different one than the final weight.
Grey is no opinion from BRBL
[cid:image001.png@01CFFEA9.E85DC020]
Von:
@mailsbestfriend.commailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com
[mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler | Limitis
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 12:53 PM
To: community@mailsbestfriend.commailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com
Subject: [MBF] AW: BARRACUDA
This graph covers 4 weeks from 2014-10-15 up
IMHO Mailinglists should (and do) always use their own mailfrom domain at the
SMTP envelope level and absolutely not that one from the list member (for
example this message should come from MBFs server with MAILFROM
mailbestfriend.com and not limitis.com). Only the header fields can be the
Just add a line
MAILFROM ENDSWITH .review
to one of your existing filter files to push him far above your hold weight...
if you really want to block so rough.
In the past 7 days I can see exactly 3 messages (out of 336000) coming from
.review
All of them are clear
Countries are the countries of the entire delivery chain. For example RU > US >
DE
Country is the originating one
Gruesse aus Suedtirol
Markus
Von: community@mailsbestfriend.com [mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com] Im
Auftrag von Martin Schaible
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2015
I would recommend using it only in combination with at least one other
indicator.
A lot of people sends simple links without any greetings, explanations or other
blabla.
It would be an idea to keep such messages in a temporary queue and count the
messages with different recipients and the
Thank you
Markus
Von: community@mailsbestfriend.com [mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com] Im
Auftrag von David Barker | Mail's Best Friend | 1-866-919-2075
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016 06:16
An: community@mailsbestfriend.com
Betreff: [MBF] Re: all_list.dat
Hi everybody
At the moment I follow a new type of (German) phishing attempts having always
the sender matching the recipient (on both smtp envelope and headers).
In declude loglines I can see
Skip AUTOWHITELIST due to the sender matches the recipient.
sender=[art@redacted] and
ltiple addresses as you would have
to create multiple filters.
David
From: community@mailsbestfriend.com [mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com] On
Behalf Of Markus Gufler | Limitis
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 5:16 AM
To: community@mailsbestfriend.com
Subject: [MBF] catch sender matches recipie
munity@mailsbestfriend.com [mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com] On
Behalf Of Markus Gufler | Limitis
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 4:06 AM
To: community@mailsbestfriend.com
Subject: [MBF] another question about PCRE
Hi all
I try to catch URLs like these (screenshot)
[cid:image001.jpg@01
want to make sure the syntax
is correct as the regex itself looks like it should be working.
From: community@mailsbestfriend.com<mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com>
[mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler | Limitis
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 11:51 PM
To: com
Hi all
I try to catch URLs like these (screenshot)
[cid:image003.jpg@01D21E2F.5095DAA0]
I tried to do this with two variants of a regex
https://regex101.com/r/i3TVSc/1
and
https://regex101.com/r/zdJ5r5/1
but both seems not being triggered within Declude.
Any idea?
Markus
Hi Martin
We use
SCANFILE1 C:\ClAV\ClamDScan.exe --quiet --no-summary -l report.txt
VIRUSCODE1 1
REPORT1.
It's long time ago, but I remember that the command line paths shouldn't be too
long, as then called there will be added also the entire path to the
Dxx.smd file in
ure]
Dean Lawrence
President
Internet Data Technology
Phone: 888-438-4381 x701
Web: www.idatatech.com<http://www.idatatech.com/>
Email: d...@idatatech.com<mailto:d...@idatatech.com>
Programming | Database | Consulting | Training
On Nov 18, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Markus Gufler
Von: community@mailsbestfriend.com [mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com] Im
Auftrag von Markus Gufler | Limitis
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2016 10:54
An: community@mailsbestfriend.com
Betreff: [MBF] AW: another question about PCRE
Hi David, Andrew
Thank you for your feedback.
Finally I
22 matches
Mail list logo