On 3/14/07, Darren Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. Is anyone using C# on linux? I thought C# was standardized so I
expected to find something, but google is only giving me articles from
2001...
I haven't used it, but the Mono project has reimplemented C# and many
of the .Net platform
What does C# bring that Java doesn't? My understanding is that C#
is Microsofts way to try to supplant Java as a standard, not a clone
but extremely similar.
What advantages over Java? It is a higher level language?
- Don
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 07:04 -0700, Jim O'Flaherty, Jr. wrote:
Don,
Your question is fertile ground for a language/platform argument fest
(flame-war?). :)
From the 10,000 foot view, I see very little difference/advantage between the
Java language/platform and the C#/.Net language/platform. As they say, though,
The difference is in the details.
My
One of the people who worked on SlugGo a long time ago is a big C# fan.
He used Mono to get some of his C# stuff working in our OS X
environment.
Cheers,
David
On 15, Mar 2007, at 12:00 AM, Brian Slesinsky wrote:
On 3/14/07, Darren Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. Is anyone using C#
If you allow multi-stone suicide, it will probably avoid a test
that may be expensive in your program, and so it may turn out to
be a net improvement in strength per second - especially if your
testing proves that it doesn't hurt in any measurable way.
Doing that test does make my C# engine
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 19:38 -0400, Chris Fant wrote:
If you allow multi-stone suicide, it will probably avoid a test
that may be expensive in your program, and so it may turn out to
be a net improvement in strength per second - especially if your
testing proves that it doesn't hurt in any
Yes, it plays better when allowing multi-stone suicides but still
prohibiting single-stone suicides. I'm still wondering if anyone else
has tried this.
On 3/15/07, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 19:38 -0400, Chris Fant wrote:
If you allow multi-stone suicide, it
